Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:01 pm to GeauxWarTigers
[quote]While that is damned impressive, I'm sure just slightly more than half are from Alabama so your state pride is slightly misguided. [/quote
Exactly
Exactly
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:18 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Oh, and the last three BCS Champions. SEC FUUUUUCKED. STATE OF ALABAMA STAAAAAAACKED.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:28 pm to BamaNixon
What school produced the most in a 1st round Miami around yk2 ?
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:30 pm to KillianRussell
quote:
Man those guys should have played USC. The Trojans were stacked and it may not have gone well. But looking back, it should have been found out, that's the game that should have been played.
Uh no, they played the year before (2003). Auburn got shut out 23 - zereaux. I guess most of the sport writers had no desire to watch a replay of Carrol raping Tubby.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:32 pm to TheNotoriousGOP
quote:
Uh no, they played the year before (2003). Auburn got shut out 23 - zereaux. I guess most of the sport writers had no desire to watch a replay of Carrol raping Tubby.
Yeah, since Auburn was exactly the same team in 04 as 03.
Are you that stupid?
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:34 pm to AMM AU9893
Evidently the voters were that stupid. History does not lie. DWI
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:35 pm to TheNotoriousGOP
quote:
Uh no, they played the year before (2003). Auburn got shut out 23 - zereaux. I guess most of the sport writers had no desire to watch a replay of Carrol raping Tubby.
Yea just like no one wanted to watch lsu beat Alabama aga.... frick wait what?
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:37 pm to chilld28
Yep, Caddy was from Etowah.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:37 pm to CrazyCadillac
the state of alabama does well with their talent...i'm impressed
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:38 pm to TheNotoriousGOP
quote:
Evidently the voters were that stupid. History does not lie. DWI
It had more to do with USC and OU starting #1 and #2, while AU started #18. But whatever you say kiddo
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:38 pm to CrazyCadillac
I'm just stating what actually happened.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:39 pm to TheNotoriousGOP
It had nothing to do with playing each other the year before.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:40 pm to CrazyCadillac
Sorry guys, I didn't mean to rain on your fap thread. 
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:50 pm to TheNotoriousGOP
quote:
Uh no, they played the year before (2003). Auburn got shut out 23 - zereaux. I guess most of the sport writers had no desire to watch a replay of Carrol raping Tubby.
And LSU beat Alabama in the first meeting of 2011...
The 2004 Auburn team was completely different than the 2003 team.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:55 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Man those guys should have played USC. The Trojans were stacked and it may not have gone well. But looking back, it should have been found out, that's the game that should have been played. Friggin Sooner love messed up two games.
Regarding Oklahoma playing USC instead of Auburn in 2004...
Auburn has nobody to blame but the guy in the AD's office that made out their schedule. If they had played ANY Div 1 team instead of 1AA Citadel that year, their, strength of schedule would have been enough to get them past Oklahoma in the computer rankings. Facty.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 7:58 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
The 2004 Auburn team was completely different than the 2003 team.
2003 club went 8-5, 2004 club went 14-0...I can't believe this isn't obvious (not speaking to you of course.)
As a side note TT, I really liked that vid but has there ever been a thread started, no matter how innocuous, on SecRant that didn't end in a fap/flame fest?
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:01 pm to TTsTowel
quote:while i do think it would have been a good game and auburn was better in 04. this alabama lsu reference makes zero sense the first game was a hard fought battle that was won on a field goal in over time in which a lot of people still said bama was the better team on the field. auburn got shut out 23-0 irrelevant comparison is irrelevant
And LSU beat Alabama in the first meeting of 2011...
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:01 pm to iglass
quote:
Auburn has nobody to blame but the guy in the AD's office that made out their schedule. If they had played ANY Div 1 team instead of 1AA Citadel that year, their, strength of schedule would have been enough to get them past Oklahoma in the computer rankings. Facty.
Yes, as I qualified 'But looking back'. Plus then the SEC rep wasn't given the benefit of the doubt as they are now due to current success.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:03 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
2003 club went 8-5, 2004 club went 14-0...I can't believe this isn't obvious (not speaking to you of course.)
Yea, the ranter above is just trying not to give credit where credit is due. It's pretty obvious that Auburn, while going undefeated in the SEC, was deserving to play USC. Noone is saying we would've won, but the game would've been much better and it would've been a sight to see.
quote:
As a side note TT, I really liked that vid but has there ever been a thread started, no matter how innocuous, on SecRant that didn't end in a fap/flame fest?
You know, that's a good question...
I honestly can't tell you "yes" as a defnite answer. Someone pretty much always comes in looking to troll, fish, etc...
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News