Started By
Message

Georgia football reports three secondary recruiting violations

Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:07 am
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:07 am
LINK

Georgia's compliance office reported three secondary recruiting violations to the NCAA in March and April. Those self-reported violations came prior to the dismissal of one recruiting support staffer and the suspension and eventual resignation of another.

According to information obtained by Dawgs247 via an open records request under the Freedom of Information Act, the violations occurred in the months of March and April, prior to the firing of recruiting program coordinator Dacia King in late April and the suspension of Lukman Abdulai, UGA's director of on-campus recruiting. Abdulai was placed on suspension for a month without pay and ultimately resigned his post.

Abdulai had been with the program for six years and helped aid the coaching staff overhaul between Mark Richt and Kirby Smart.

J. Reid Parker Director of Athletics Greg McGarity has elected not to comment when asked about the two staffers, stating that he doesn't discuss personnel matters. Smart has responded similarly when asked.

According to UGA's official website, the program has since hired former Vanderbilt recruiting staff member, as the director of recruiting operations.
No names were mentioned in the documents obtained by 247Sports but one violation was reported on April 29 relating to impermissible entertainment. An "institutional staff member" escorted a student-athlete to the sideline for a couple of minutes during the Bulldogs' G-Day Spring Scrimmage, which is against NCAA rules. That staffer was not allowed to participate in on-campus recruiting activities for 30 days.

A pair of violations were also reported the month prior on March 8. One of those was related to a student worker who escorted a recruit from check-in to his seat and spent five minutes with the prospective student athlete. That resulted in a violation because the student worker isn't allowed to have recruiting duties. The full-time support staffer was reprimanded via a letter for allowing the student worker to host the recruit and said student worker was banned participating in any events where recruits were present and placed in an office role for the remainder of the 2018-2019 school year.
The other March 8 violation was related to a member of the coaching staff providing a video to the parent of a recruit who wasn't able to accompany the student-athlete on the visit. The video was "personalized" per the report, making it a violation.

The violating member of UGA's coaching staff was forbidden to have contact with that recruit for 30 days after the infraction was reported, including text messages, phone calls, and off-campus visits during the spring evaluation period. UGA also took away two spring evaluation days for said staff member.

All three of the violations were tagged with the Level III label, which means they were unintentional, isolated, and didn't provide a major recruiting advantage.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86428 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:10 am to
quote:

One of those was related to a student worker who escorted a recruit from check-in to his seat and spent five minutes with the prospective student athlete. That resulted in a violation because the student worker isn't allowed to have recruiting duties.


what I want to know in this unbelievably minor things like this is how they are even found out?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59396 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:18 am to
We're still self-reporting this inane shite?
Posted by Mad Dawg 2020
Member since Jun 2017
731 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:20 am to
I don't usually follow these tiny violations closely so forgive me if this is a stupid question.

What, if any, punishments are usually handed down for these types of infractions?
Posted by NCDawg52
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2014
3151 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:26 am to
Level III violations don't carry any recommendations for punishment, and likely won't even garner a response from the NCAA.

The self administered restrictions for individual staffers listed in the paragraphs above will be the extent of the response.

The severity of these type of offenses is akin to underpaying your quarterly tax estimate by a few dollars. Admit mistake, correct it, move on.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25487 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:26 am to
Self imposed.

No contact with said recruit for 30 days.

Or 2 weeks without field visits to schools/recruits.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39956 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I don't usually follow these tiny violations closely so forgive me if this is a stupid question.

What, if any, punishments are usually handed down for these types of infractions?




Usually something light like not hosting recruits for a few days or that particular coach can't contact recruits for a short time.

I wonder if we report these small things so that the NCAA leaves us alone and doesn't look into some other things.
Posted by MacDawg
Austin, TX
Member since Nov 2015
359 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:40 am to
It's smart to report this stuff, imo. It gives the NCAA the impression Georgia is diligently looking after things. I'd rather that than have the NCAA wonder why such a large program with such great classes never even reports minor infractions and wanting to take a deeper look for themselves.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86428 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:46 am to
quote:

It's smart to report this stuff, imo.


It's pretty commonplace, I'm pretty sure all schools report this small stuff since there's no real reason not to.

quote:

It gives the NCAA the impression Georgia is diligently looking after things. I'd rather that than have the NCAA wonder why such a large program with such great classes never even reports minor infractions and wanting to take a deeper look for themselves.


Maybe, but it's not like this goodwill has ever gotten us anywhere. Schools like auburn and aTm basically tell the NCAA to go frick themselves and they get off scot free while we fall on our own sword and grovel to the NCAA to appear like goodboys which only ever ends in suspensions.
Posted by JackTraven
Maryland
Member since Aug 2016
5580 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:47 am to
Weren't the two staffers responsible for this terminated in the spring?
Posted by NCDawg52
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2014
3151 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Maybe, but it's not like this goodwill has ever gotten us anywhere. Schools like auburn and aTm basically tell the NCAA to go frick themselves and they get off scot free while we fall on our own sword and grovel to the NCAA to appear like goodboys which only ever ends in suspensions.


Both of those schools, along with all other major programs, regularly self report this type of violation. Totally different discussion than defense strategy in the face of major violations/investigations. When it comes to that, I certainly agree that the "lawyer up, F U, come and get us" approach is the best one to take.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86428 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:53 am to
I know, I was just pointing out that reporting this small stuff doesn't really get us any brownie points or anything.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:54 am to
quote:

An "institutional staff member" escorted a student-athlete to the sideline for a couple of minutes during the Bulldogs' G-Day Spring Scrimmage, which is against NCAA rules.

quote:

One of those was related to a student worker who escorted a recruit from check-in to his seat and spent five minutes with the prospective student athlete.

quote:

The other March 8 violation was related to a member of the coaching staff providing a video to the parent of a recruit who wasn't able to accompany the student-athlete on the visit. The video was "personalized" per the report, making it a violation.


Jesus christ sometimes NCAA regulations are just ridiculous.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46385 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 12:38 pm to
That’s pretty much it. It appeases the NCAA because it allows the NCAA to say “see, they’re policing themselves like they’re supposed to”

The whole model is Soviet level bureaucracy stupid; it has nothing to do with actually producing internal ethical, fair behavior and everything to do with managing external appearances
This post was edited on 7/11/19 at 12:40 pm
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63768 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 1:26 pm to
Exactly. If you *dont* self report a few things each year then NCAA gets suspicious. It is routine. Every school does it.

This story, however, is still fricky. The beginning has nothing to do with the end.
Posted by AlaCowboy
North Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
6938 posts
Posted on 7/12/19 at 8:34 am to
quote:

It's smart to report this stuff, imo. It gives the NCAA the impression Georgia is diligently looking after things.


If the NCAA ever does come calling, it's much better that they have a record of these being reported by us. The NCAA doesn't like to find things that should have been reported, no matter how minor.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12412 posts
Posted on 7/12/19 at 9:47 am to
There is no way the NCAA can last 20 more years. Greed and video cameras will eventually do them in.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter