Started By
Message

(Article) <—Not my opinion in case you can’t read- IS GEORGIA A YOUNG TEAM?

Posted on 10/17/18 at 12:28 pm
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 12:28 pm
“Many Georgia fans have comforted themselves since the beatdown in BR with the certain knowledge that this edition of the Bulldogs is very young and can be expected to have a lapse during the grind of SEC play. “Young” is a relative term that must be evaluated in terms of an opponent’s participation chart. That is, Georgia is a young team only if its competition boasts participation charts loaded with more experienced players, right? With that in mind, I checked the official SID charts of each school from last Saturday to see how the Dawgs stacked up against its competition on the youth curve. I also looked at Alabama’s chart to see how far Kirby and Company have to go to catch up with what everyone knows to be an upperclassman loaded Tide roster given the success of Tide recruiting for the past decade.


For the purpose of this exercise, I decided to count freshmen, redshirt freshmen, sophomores and redshirt sophomores that actually played in Saturday’s games. LSU does not list redshirts in its official roster, therefore, I had no way of limiting the comparison the true freshmen and sophomores.


Go on, make your guesses. How many young players saw the field for UGA Saturday compared to LSU? How much of an experience advantage does Bama field each week? Let’s look at the numbers.




Played = did not start but entered the game for at least one down


Myth busted! Bama, LSU and UGA fielded the same number of underclassmen last Saturday. To be fair, LSU and Alabama were at home and won by comfortable margins. Those facts could account for more underclassmen seeing the field for those schools than might have during a close game, and I admit that my counting was hurried and I could have missed a player or two. However, the premise that Georgia is playing with a roster that is significantly younger than other SEC contenders is incorrect. In fact, Alabama started more underclassmen than either UGA or LSU last Saturday.


Think about it. If a school signs close to 25 players per year with a hard limit of 85 total scholarships, attrition has to happen. Players who are not seeing the field on gameday by the time they are juniors tend to start thinking about transferring or giving up the sport. Alabama is popularly thought to “encourage” upperclassmen who are not part of the rotation in their position group to seek playing time elsewhere. My guess is that all top programs practice that type of roster management, thus the similarity in numbers for the three schools in this article. Of course, there are also players who opt into the NFL draft, as well.


The Dawgs were just beaten at LSU. No excuses are available. The only remedy is a skinned gator!”

LINK
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 3:56 pm
Posted by Dudley Humptyfrats
'Murica
Member since Oct 2010
2134 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 12:46 pm to
Are you just going to yell every thread you start?
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7897 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:05 pm to
He can't help it, he just had a mad pump at the gym and is amped.
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
21702 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:09 pm to
Blah blah blah blah.....

How come you didn’t break down where the youth was as far as positions with the relative experience around them to cover for them and teach them.....

Wouldn’t it be worse “young” to have 3 freshman play in the DBackfield then 1 on DL, 1 at WR and 1 as a star?

How many “played” for LSU in the 4th qtr only?

How many of the “young” are first year starters or players vs “young” Rso that started all last year as a Rfr.....

Why did I waste my time responding to this shite thread.....that I can fix.....bye
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 1:13 pm
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39963 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Myth busted!


Uh, that person looked at the wrong info. Most of us agree that we're a young team because 70% of our roster right now are freshman and sophomores. And you data didn't bust any myths, it just proved that we are in fact a young team with 31 freshmen and sophomores getting playing time. That's not a great recipe for success.

By the way, we have the 5th youngest roster in the nation. But hey, keep looking to buck the board
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
9403 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:34 pm to
Thread is useless without number of snaps played. A freshman that played one snap counts as much as a freshman that played the entire game.

Thanks for clearing up absolutely nothing.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30538 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

IS GEORGIA A YOUNG TEAM?


Yes they are
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Are you just going to yell every thread you start?


I’m not yelling you dumb fricking idiot. I copied and pasted the header and body which I made obvious by saying this is an article.
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

(Article) IS GEORGIA A YOUNG TEAM? Blah blah blah blah..... How come you didn’t break down where the youth was as far as positions with the relative experience around them to cover for them and teach them..... Wouldn’t it be worse “young” to have 3 freshman play in the DBackfield then 1 on DL, 1 at WR and 1 as a star? How many “played” for LSU in the 4th qtr only? How many of the “young” are first year starters or players vs “young” Rso that started all last year as a Rfr..... Why did I waste my time responding to this shite thread.....that I can fix.....bye


I didn’t write it nor did I State my opinion on it dumbass. Why can’t you read that it’s an article?
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 3:54 pm
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Uh, that person looked at the wrong info. Most of us agree that we're a young team because 70% of our roster right now are freshman and sophomores. And you data didn't bust any myths, it just proved that we are in fact a young team with 31 freshmen and sophomores getting playing time. That's not a great recipe for success. By the way, we have the 5th youngest roster in the nation. But hey, keep looking to buck the board


Article
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 3:53 pm
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Thread is useless without number of snaps played. A freshman that played one snap counts as much as a freshman that played the entire game. Thanks for clearing up absolutely nothing.


Tell the author
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 4:00 pm to
If you can't tell, if you copy and paste an entire article without providing your own commentary, it more or less is taken as implied agreement. If you *didn't* agree with it, or had an alternate opinion on the subject, one would presume that you might link the article, highlight the points of interest, and then make a comment as to your own thought. This is general message board procedure. Better luck next time.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 5:16 pm to
How exactly is that "myth busted"? The "young players" number reflects those who were on the field for at least one play, not the amount of time that they played.

There's quite a difference between putting in 20 some "young players" for the final series of the game when everything has already been decided and having to use 20 some "young players" consistently throughout the game.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

I copied and pasted the header and body which I made obvious by saying this is an article.



The technical term for that is "adoptive admission"
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39963 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Article


No shite. Obviously an article that you agree with and proves some bullshite point that you're trying to make.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32757 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

How exactly is that "myth busted"? The "young players" number reflects those who were on the field for at least one play, not the amount of time that they played.

There's quite a difference between putting in 20 some "young players" for the final series of the game when everything has already been decided and having to use 20 some "young players" consistently throughout the game.




Sure there is a difference there, but Did that happen? Someone needs to prove thats the case here.
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
21702 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

Tell the author


So, you are the fricktard that copies and pastes an entire article from someone else’s site, and doesn’t give them any credit or a link, then acts like a douchebag to people who have have been posting for 15 years on this site and the previous site that was bought....
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:11 pm to
Y’all some blind arse motherfrickers. Do you not see the fricking quotes? Do you not see the link at the bottom? Did you mean 15 years or 50 fricking years? Get some damn reading glasses.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30538 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 6:34 am to
there is a quote button for a reason. try it
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 6:40 am to
quote:

Y’all some blind arse motherfrickers.


They sure are
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter