Started By
Message
Dirty Dan got bitches crying on here
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:22 am
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:22 am
I love it. Text book putting the hat on the ball and you cheerleaders can't stand it. Hopefully he'll make yall cry some more next week. Deal with it.
7
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:57 am to dirty bastard
Soft bitches don't understand smash mouth football anymore.
We used to be a proper country.
We used to be a proper country.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:21 am to dirty bastard
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This is textbook targeting. The first thing that moves at contact is the QB's head.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:22 am to hashtag
No, you can’t see where it makes contact with from that angle and I believe he puts the helmet on the ball
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:22 am to hashtag
Beautiful hit. Thanks for the replay.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:23 am to hashtag
quote:
This is textbook targeting. The first thing that moves at contact is the QB's head.
There’s never been any consistency with targeting calls. Why act like this is something new?
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:24 am to hashtag
quote:
This is textbook targeting. The first thing that moves at contact is the QB's head.
I see you are conveniently ignoring the shot on Lovett in the end zone …of course you are.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:24 am to djsdawg
quote:It takes me back to a better time.
Beautiful hit. Thanks for the replay.
Pre-portal.
Pre-NIL.
Pre-19th Amendment
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:24 am to dirty bastard
I didn’t think it was targeting. I was surprised they didn’t take a look though.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:24 am to athenslife101
quote:not taking sides here, but did you really see any video angle that shows it wasn't targeting?
I believe he puts the helmet on the ball
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:25 am to Dawg7730
quote:this thread was about a different play. It looked to me like GT also had 2 different targeting calls that weren't called against them. This thread wasn't about that, though. If you went to GT you'd probably be smart enough to follow along.
I see you are conveniently ignoring the shot on Lovett in the end zone …of course you are
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:26 am to Chicken
quote:
did you really see any video angle that shows it wasn't targeting?
King said in his post game interview the helmet hit the ball. He could be wrong though.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:27 am to Chicken
Do you see an angle that shows it absolutely is?
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:29 am to hashtag
No it's not. You lower your shoulders to make a hit. Is he supposed to move his head 3ft to the right?
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:36 am to tylerdurden24
quote:correct me if I am wrong, but I thought you were not supposed to hit an opposing player with the crown of your helmet...
Do you see an angle that shows it absolutely is?
quote:
it is targeting...If the player lowers their head before making a tackle and makes forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
This post was edited on 11/30/24 at 10:37 am
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:39 am to Crimson K
quote:
targeting. I was surprised they didn’t take a look though.
They certainly did. I thought they were about to call it, but the video didn’t show definitive proof of it.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:40 am to hashtag
quote:
play. It looked to me like GT also had 2 different targeting calls that weren't called against them.
Exactly. Refs weren’t calling that in this game. Tech got away with 2 far more obvious targets
This post was edited on 11/30/24 at 10:41 am
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:40 am to Chicken
In the head or neck area
He hit the ball and King said it post game
He hit the ball and King said it post game
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:41 am to dirty bastard
quote:
Dirty Dan
I love that kid
Posted on 11/30/24 at 10:41 am to Chicken
quote:
correct me if I am wrong, but I thought you were not supposed to hit an opposing player with the crown of your helmet...
It happens every game and goes uncalled often
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News