Started By
Message
re: CB Jermaine Roberts commits to Texas
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:02 pm to Garfield
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:02 pm to Garfield
quote:
I said the last "great" RB not the last "good" RB (e.g., Hilliard, Hill, etc.). "Great" to me means a RB that will be the first back taken in the draft (or any first round back if there are multiple great backs in a class).
You mean that injury prone RB that got these comments?
quote:
Bucky Brooks ?@BuckyBrooks 21m The lack of conditioning exhibited today will lead some coaches and scouts to question his work ethic. Concerns must be addressed in Mtgs
Bucky Brooks ?@BuckyBrooks 29m He posted a 32.5 vertical and 9-7 broad jump & clocked a 4.44 short shuttle. Disappointing positional workout. Out of shape.Unable to finish
That 1st round LOCK is watching his draft stock plummet.
1
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:07 pm to mcneil912
quote:
I know, that is why I pointed out Hill.
Sorry, I assumed you meant "good." I didn't know you didn't watch football.
Hill 2012 totals: 775 yards @ 5.3 a carry
Lacy 2012 totals: 1322 @ 6.5 a carry
That is the difference between "good" and "great"
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:08 pm to memphisplaya
Anyone who quotes someone named Bucky Brooks in order to win an argument has already lost.
Do you really believe he will not be the first RB taken in the draft?
Do you really believe he will not be the first RB taken in the draft?
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:13 pm to Garfield
You don't know WTF you're talking about clown,as usual.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:16 pm to FightinTiga
Are you disputing the stats I found on ESPN or that Lacy will be the first back taken in the draft?
Complements on the insult though (I think calling someone a clown is underrated with the new generation).
Complements on the insult though (I think calling someone a clown is underrated with the new generation).
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:16 pm to Garfield
Eddie Lacy isn't, and wasn't, great.
Then again, you and I probably have different definitions for that word.
Then again, you and I probably have different definitions for that word.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:19 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Then again, you and I probably have different definitions for that word.
I can respect that.
What would you call someone who NFL teams think is the best college RB in the entire country?
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:24 pm to Garfield
quote:
Sorry, I assumed you meant "good." I didn't know you didn't watch football
Attacking the person instead of the argument is a sure sign of immaturity. quote:
Hill 2012 totals: 775 yards @ 5.3 a carry Lacy 2012 totals: 1322 @ 6.5 a carry
Hill barely played until half way through the season. Honestly, they both aren't considered "great" in my eyes just yet. This is from lsusports.net:
quote:
Had one of the best true freshman seasons in LSU history with 755 yards rushing with 12 TDs ... Added eight receptions for 73 yards ... Did all of that despite playing in just four of LSU's first six games ... Carried the ball just 13 times thru first six weeks of the season
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:25 pm to Garfield
Im disputing the assumption of Lacy being better than Hill.I had the luxury of seeing both play in H.S. AND Hill was better then and will prove to be better once his career at LSU is complete.Those stats don't mean shite when Lacy was the featured back and Hill didn't see significant PT until mid season.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:25 pm to Garfield
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/2/22 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:30 pm to Garfield
quote:
Do you really believe he will not be the first RB taken in the draft?
He probably will be. But I think that draft position is overrated. Sure he may be the best Rb in this draft, but what's his competition? Are there other Rbs that you would consider great in this draft. Would he go first in previous RB heavy drafts?
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:31 pm to mcneil912
quote:
Attacking the person instead of the argument is a sure sign of immaturity.
Edit: to remove the part where I overreacted.
This post was edited on 4/13/13 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:32 pm to graychef
quote:
You're comparing stats only to make your point that Lacy is better than Hill?
Watch the two run. There isn't much difference except Hill hasn't been injured and has played two fewer years.
There is over a yard per carry difference - that HUGE.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:35 pm to FightinTiga
quote:
Im disputing the assumption of Lacy being better than Hill.I had the luxury of seeing both play in H.S. AND Hill was better then and will prove to be better once his career at LSU is complete.Those stats don't mean shite when Lacy was the featured back and Hill didn't see significant PT until mid season.
How can this be true if he had such a lower yard per carry average. By the way - Lacy's yard per carry was even higher when he was not the feature back (7.3 as a freshman and 7.1 as a soph.).
5.3 yards per carry is average (especially considering he wasn't even a "true" freshman as he had to sit out a year with legal problems).
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:42 pm to Garfield
quote:
Your a douche
You're*
quote:
saying the other person who disagreed with you FIRST must not watch football is not attacking the person not the argument. That's extremely mild
I agree, very mild, but to first resort to that is immature. Why can't we have a normal football discussion?
Posted on 4/12/13 at 6:59 pm to Garfield
quote:
There is over a yard per carry difference - that HUGE.
Have you seen LSU's awesome offense lately?
Posted on 4/12/13 at 8:35 pm to aTm's conference now
I misread it also then because it seemed like you said we paid for him and the icing was not taking a running back.
Also, Garfield I know you troll 99% of the time but if you think Bama had the best O-Line in the country last year than Lacy was not great. By the simple fact that he was outplayed by a freshman and the great back that left the year before him outplayed him about a million times over when they were both the featured back. So no Lacy was not "great" in college.
Also, Garfield I know you troll 99% of the time but if you think Bama had the best O-Line in the country last year than Lacy was not great. By the simple fact that he was outplayed by a freshman and the great back that left the year before him outplayed him about a million times over when they were both the featured back. So no Lacy was not "great" in college.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 8:50 pm to mcneil912
quote:
Your a douche
You're*
I think you just proved my point.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 8:53 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
I misread it also then because it seemed like you said we paid for him and the icing was not taking a running back.
I don't think either one of us misread it.
quote:
if you think Bama had the best O-Line in the country last year than Lacy was not great. By the simple fact that he was outplayed by a freshman and the great back that left the year before him outplayed him about a million times over when they were both the featured back. So no Lacy was not "great" in college.
Brother, he is projected to be the first picked RB in the draft!! If I am wrong about him being great - so is the NFL (and they know Bama had a good OL last year).
Posted on 4/12/13 at 9:08 pm to Garfield
quote:
Garfield
Is so mad that he posted back to back five times in this thread, including the ever elusive three posts in a row.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News