Started By
Message
re: 43% of Auburn's 2009 and 2010 signees are no longer there
Posted on 1/30/12 at 10:10 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 1/30/12 at 10:10 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
I love how bama fans think it is a big burn to call Chizik by his first name.
How about Toothless Bitch?
0
Posted on 1/30/12 at 10:11 am to joeyb147
quote:
I'm not worried with this staff and the non-qualifiers. 7 of the 8 who signed and didn't make to campus were filled in Chizik's first year, without a full staff, and with less than 2 months to try and salvage a recruiting class. 4 of those 7 committed to Tuberville.
Raw numbers can be very misleading. quote:Pretty impressive. Also, given his background and the rules of recruiting at the time, that offer was worth the risk of non-qualifying (which every one new was likely at the time).
Auburn has only had 1 NQ during the past two classes (Jeremy Richardson).
quote:It is hard to know the real story with most. If Chizik is setting the rules and guys just refuse to follow them, then hopefully it will pay off in the long run. Dyer is the only one that I can recall that really bothers me. Based on what has happened since, I think Rollison was over rated in the first place.
Some of the transfers are a little troublesome however.
I just want to get to a point of strength with talent and depth. Seems like we are still another recruiting class away unless we pull off a handful of upsets on NSD.
This post was edited on 1/30/12 at 10:13 am
Posted on 1/30/12 at 10:14 am to WDE24
quote:
And if you don't include the 5 who graduated or went pro, it drops significantly further. I guess it just all depends on the angle of the story being perpetuated.
Yep. I'd be happy to put the list of Auburn's "processed" players up to Bama's. Also, why would you "process" players you need like Rollinson and Aycock and keep yourself BELOW the (85) limit?!?!
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News