Started By
Message

re: You knew it was coming (at least us smart folks did)...college players now unionizing

Posted on 7/23/22 at 2:49 pm to
Posted by mikeboss550
Member since Apr 2013
10670 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 2:49 pm to
In that case no transfers, you sign an employment contract and pay taxes on it and schools hire GM,s to trade and you can't say no to what school you go to...how's that

Edit: also no more schollys you pay your way and pay for food like pros do..
This post was edited on 7/23/22 at 2:51 pm
Posted by atlanta917
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2017
5687 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Do we get replacement players if they go on strike?

We’ll get Shane Falco
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11825 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Not for SEC and BIG schools.Its closer to the 25% to 30% range.


The breakdown I saw was across the board so maybe right for the bigger schools but overall not the main source as some like to believe as so many other factors come into to play.
Posted by OklahomaLurker
Member since Jul 2021
74 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 3:15 pm to
Unions are a good thing

I don't know how you collectively bargain with cfb players who are 3 and done or able to flunk out of school however
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11825 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

also no more schollys you pay your way and pay for food like pros do..


Yes no more scholarships but tuition and other related expenses will be part of the benefit package.

Sort of like when a camp counselor works all summer. Part of their pay covers their room and board as well with any other expenses. It just comes out of their check without ever seeing it. When I first got our of Corps I was a river guide for a rafting company. My checks were not great once everything was taken out but everything was covered so basically all went to savings.
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11825 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Unions are a good thing


I will disagree in general they have not been successful. Hence why the rust belt, NE and NW have lost so many jobs to the south and other Right to Work states. They do not support free enterprise but establish a status quo of entitlement for anyone in them regardless of their contribution to the whole.
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
30949 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

So dramatic

How dare they want a slice of the pie and better medical care

Devils


I agree with the failed relationship Gamecock for once.

I’m not sure why the posters here hate the laws of this land which allow for groups of people to bargain as a collective in their own interests.

I personally love America.

Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22358 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 3:24 pm to
quote:


You knew it was coming (at least us smart folks did)...college players now unionizing
Penn State has now become the first chapter of unionized football players in the nation.

Led by quarterback Sean Clifford, Penn State players are asking for revenue sharing and want better medical care.

The tweet adds that The College Football Players Association is already in negotiations with the Big Ten.

Stick a fork in college football...it's done! LINK


You have to be employees to unionize.

NIL doesn't make them employees of the schools.

Pretty sure this got shot down already.
Posted by CatBBN
Member since Jan 2020
2422 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 3:37 pm to
I understand wanting more to match the revenue they are creating for the university and everything it comes with but man…the things I would’ve done and sacrificed to have the opportunity to play big time football.

I’m afraid if players want to be considered employees, they’re greatly underestimating the negatives that come with being considered an employee. There’s no scenario where players are gonna be able to make millions off of NIL, a salary from the school, free healthcare for life, free meal/housing, free gear/clothes and not have some skin in the game.
Posted by tgrmeat
Member since Sep 2020
4296 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 4:48 pm to
At this point it may be better to let it burn and start over.
Posted by viceman
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2016
30688 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

Do we get replacement players if they go on strike?



Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22358 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

I understand wanting more to match the revenue they are creating for the university and everything it comes with but man…the things I would’ve done and sacrificed to have the opportunity to play big time football.

I’m afraid if players want to be considered employees, they’re greatly underestimating the negatives that come with being considered an employee. There’s no scenario where players are gonna be able to make millions off of NIL, a salary from the school, free healthcare for life, free meal/housing, free gear/clothes and not have some skin in the game.




The thing is, the players don't really create that revenue. You could take the top5000 or whatever players each year, put them in a supplemental league separate from college football, and college football would not miss a beat.

Because the actual draw is the schools themselves. The players are the ones who benefit from these things tremendously. People are fans of the teams, regardless of who plays for them.

This is proven time and time again when other leagues are constantly trying to form, but can't get the fans. When they do form, they pay the players very little money, don't provide the coaching, or anything remotely close to what is provided in college football. Because there is no real market for them.

There is some value in terms of competitiveness, and some teams getting better players overall. But again, take out the top5000 players, and the 5001st player is just the new "5 star".

At any rate, the schools don't actually make profit. All the revenue goes back into sports.
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11825 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

I’m not sure why the posters here hate the laws of this land which allow for groups of people to bargain as a collective in their own interests.

I personally love America.



Which part of America? The 28 Right to Work states that have laws preventing the abuse of power that labor unions yield or the 22 states that allow unions to dictate how a business works and who gets the profit?

For the record every state that has an SEC school in it is also a Right to Work state.
Posted by ChiGator
Member since Nov 2020
3260 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 10:38 pm to
There’s a reason NFLPA still hasn’t been able to get their players lifetime health care. The insurance companies will fight it and it’s expensive as frick. Not sure what else these college players expect they’re going to get.
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
30949 posts
Posted on 7/24/22 at 12:04 am to
quote:

Which part of America?


The part that won the Civil War, the Federal part.


quote:

Right to Work state.


Who says the left is winning the language war when the far right has been using terms like right to work which literally means the opposite of right to work.
Posted by SCDawg95
Fayetteville ,NC
Member since Oct 2019
5595 posts
Posted on 7/24/22 at 7:13 am to
quote:

So dramatic How dare they want a slice of the pie and better medical care Devils
dude….
Posted by gamecockman12
Columbia, SC
Member since Aug 2012
5827 posts
Posted on 7/24/22 at 8:06 am to
Selfish arse players.
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11825 posts
Posted on 7/24/22 at 8:20 am to
quote:

right to work which literally means the opposite of right to work.



Actually Right to Work literally means given the choice. Right to Work allows the worker to decide if they want to be a part of a union or not.

Since you want to make this political I would say in the 22 union supported states it takes on more of the role of communism, CWP to be more exact, where the worker does not have the choice. In Union controlled states the worker does not have a choice to be a part of the union or not. Union membership can be a condition of employment to be hired.

Even in the Right the Work states unions exist but the worker decides if they want to be in one or not.

No matter what your political ideology is I think free choice is always the best option.

Though I understand how the left believes someone else should pick for them just like everything should be given to them as well.
This post was edited on 7/24/22 at 8:59 am
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 7/24/22 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Better medical care? Don’t they have everything paid for already? What’s better than that?


I was told the good thing about an insurance driven system was that you can choose your doctor (which we all know is only true if you have good insurance). Maybe their insurance sucks?
Posted by MEd LSU
Member since Dec 2018
3687 posts
Posted on 7/24/22 at 1:35 pm to
You are ate up with the dumbass. Try thinking past the tip of your nose for once
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter