Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:45 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
They clearly do fall below Auburn on that list.
OK, but that just says "statistics lie" to me. Frazier made me think Chizik just grabbed some random guy off the street and handed him the ball. Fans of other teams seem to agree, so it wasn't just the A&M game. And weirdly, his replacement in the game wasn't any better.
I'm not trying to be (too much of) a jerk here and am actually sympathetic - if Auburn had an adequate QB you'd have had a much better season.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:48 pm to finestfirst79
quote:
Frazier
We played more than one QB BTW, its a team ranking
quote:
his replacement in the game wasn't any better
6/9 122 13.6 2
6/11 89 8.1 0
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:48 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
I think we were down to 3rd stringer Whitlow at that point and possibly had to travel with a scout team QB as backup due to injuries too.
Ah that would make more sense then. I just remember that being possibly the worst QB play I had seen in a long time.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:48 pm to finestfirst79
Mandatory JFF mention, no wonder he's taking a break from twitter...
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:52 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Ah that would make more sense then. I just remember that being possibly the worst QB play I had seen in a long time.
Yeah it got bad. Max Smith got hurt early with his shoulder and ankle and was out for the season, Morgan Newton was Morgan Newton (also dealt with injury as well), Jalen Whitlow played as a true freshman, and when he stalled they burned Patrick Towles redshirt and he got injured on his second drive for the season. It was bad.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:54 pm to wdeinttown
Agreed. I couldn't sense the sarcasm.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:55 pm to wdeinttown
Auburn's and it wasn't close.
Auburn had 15 picks on 257 attempts.
Mizzou had 14 picks on 414 attempts.
Auburn's passer rating was slightly better but our overall numbers sucked.
Auburn had 15 picks on 257 attempts.
Mizzou had 14 picks on 414 attempts.
Auburn's passer rating was slightly better but our overall numbers sucked.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 3:56 pm to finestfirst79
quote:
OK, but that just says "statistics lie" to me.
The statistics aren't lying at all. Clearly, the collective QB rating for Missouri was worse than Auburn's. Does that mean Missouri's QB play was without a doubt worse than Auburn's? No. But it does show that a case can be made that it was.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:00 pm to FormMorm
quote:
Mandatory JFF mention
Already covered
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:03 pm to wdeinttown
Say what you want about how shitty UF's passing game was last year, but they were more efficient than they looked. Their job was not to turn it over and they were succesful in that regard in every game but 2.
It's amazing how Scott Loeffler took two pretty good passing teams in UF and Auburn and completely destroyed them in one year of coaching at each school.
It's amazing how Scott Loeffler took two pretty good passing teams in UF and Auburn and completely destroyed them in one year of coaching at each school.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:04 pm to wdeinttown
quote:
Kentucky was last in the league with a team QB rating of 89.50.
That's what happens when your starting QB goes down early in the season and you have to play a true freshman...
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:12 pm to wdeinttown
quote:
The statistics aren't lying at all. Clearly, the collective QB rating for Missouri was worse than Auburn's. Does that mean Missouri's QB play was without a doubt worse than Auburn's? No. But it does show that a case can be made that it was.
I know injuries play a factor with every team, but Mizzou's oline was decimated before the season even started. Enough injuries that they eventually had to start a walk on.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:21 pm to reedus23
quote:
The statistics aren't lying at all.
Statistically, the average American has one testicle. Argue with that.
quote:
Clearly, the collective QB rating for Missouri was worse than Auburn's. Does that mean Missouri's QB play was without a doubt worse than Auburn's? No.
That's all I was trying to say. Mizzou's QB (who wasn't the injured Franklin) against A&M was... not great but not awful. Frazier was just awful. Hope you guys come up with something better soon.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:24 pm to wdeinttown
quote:
In 2012, Kiehl Frazier was the worst quarterback I've ever seen. Unprepared, gun shy, sketchy in the pocket, and flat out inaccurate. He looked like he had never played quarterback before.
And thus the clear front runner for 2013.
Abso-frickin'-lutely! Gussy'll get him right. Lashlee was pretty solid against shite competition in the Gus offense at Shiloh too. If those two can't turn him into a Josh Floyd, nobody can.
and I called his benching at half against Arkansas in August!
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:30 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
Frazier was probably the worst QB I have ever seen start multiple SEC games.
Agreed.. The first half of the MSU of game I remember my friend telling me Auburn may not win an SEC game if Frazier was the best they could do.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:52 pm to wdeinttown
Damn, I didn't ever by in to the whole "Mettsiah" thing but i still can't believe we are ahead of LSU
Posted on 3/28/13 at 4:55 pm to wdeinttown
Frazier was hands down the worst qb to ever start for Auburn. He threw that one gorgeous bomb against Clemson, but whoopdy frickin doo.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 5:38 pm to TTsTowel
Is Kiehl Frazier the Jake Holland of quarterbacks, or is Jake Holland the Kiehl Frazier of linebackers?
This is an important question that needs to be answered.
This is an important question that needs to be answered.
Posted on 3/28/13 at 5:39 pm to wdeinttown
Frazier was bad, but Morgan Newton had to be worse.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News