Started By
Message
Which would be a worse scenario for Auburn and Tennessee fans : UGA or Bama winning?
Posted on 12/18/17 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 12/18/17 at 12:46 pm
I have to imagine it would be Georgia, right? Especially for Auburn people.
21
Posted on 12/18/17 at 12:48 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Who cares? If UGA wins it all, they earned it.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 12:49 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I'd much rather our new coach win a national championship, IMO
Posted on 12/18/17 at 12:49 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I think if Georgia and Alabama played each other for the National Championship, they could say they beat both teams. That would give their team credibility by beating the two teams in the big game, plus beating the team that beat one of the teams that beat them.
However, LSU fans would somehow turn it into a National Championship for the Tigahs.
However, LSU fans would somehow turn it into a National Championship for the Tigahs.
This post was edited on 12/18/17 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 12/18/17 at 12:56 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I would be fine with either.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:01 pm to Hussss
Don’t really care either way. I guess UGA, simply because the don’t have a recent NC.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:03 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Competitively, I would think UGA given their recruiting situations.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:04 pm to Crowknowsbest
Roll Tide, if they play.... Otherwise, Go Tigers and Boomer Sooner..
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:04 pm to Supravol22
quote:
'd much rather our new coach win a national championship, IMO
Fine with me. As long as it’s your new Defensive Coordinator with the Natty
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:06 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I would rather UGA win 1000 NCs than Bama win one.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:16 pm to SummerOfGeorge
It would crush auburn if we win, aboslutely crush them. Bama winning is old hat, it's routine at this point and isn't going to really do much to change either program.
Right now, pretty much the ONLY thing au can hang their hat on with us is a more recent natty (although we both just have 1 since 1960..). We have more wins, more SEC titles, more head to head wins, better winning percentage, just about better everythign other than a more recent national title. If they lose that as their main talking point they will self destruct.
Right now, pretty much the ONLY thing au can hang their hat on with us is a more recent natty (although we both just have 1 since 1960..). We have more wins, more SEC titles, more head to head wins, better winning percentage, just about better everythign other than a more recent national title. If they lose that as their main talking point they will self destruct.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:23 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Boomer Sooner
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:24 pm to WG_Dawg
UGA would be worse from a recruiting standpoint. At this point, Bama may as well win another.
frick Dabo, Boomer Sooner.
frick Dabo, Boomer Sooner.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:26 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Definitely Georgia.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:26 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
It would crush auburn if we win, aboslutely crush them.
Not in the slightest. You'd get a "Well, frick." That's about it.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:30 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
1 since 1960
Such an arbitrary number
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:35 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Which would be a worse scenario for Auburn and Tennessee fans : UGA or Bama winning?
Auburn and Tennessee compete more directly with UGA in the state of Georgia for recruits so they definitely don't want Georgia to win it. Bama winning would just maintain the status quo in recruiting.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:41 pm to DuncanIdaho
quote:
Such an arbitrary number
well AU really doesn't have one in 57 either IMO due to probation but I figured I'd allow it. My point was that going allllllll the way back to the 60s both teams only have 1 title, so it's not like we're comparing apples and tennis balls, but AU does happen to have one far more recently which kinda gives a leg up in that department. If you take that leg up away you've basically got nothign, other than a more recent heisman but wgas
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:45 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
other than a more recent heisman but wgas
2 more recent heismans, but who is counting? certainly not you.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 1:52 pm to DuncanIdaho
quote:
Such an arbitrary number
Pretty sure his point is that there is two total for both teams. There is not arbitrary numbers. It should always be total trophies. Arbitrary numbers come from posters (not just Auburn posters) picking out a year to back up claims, forgetting that to get a full picture you go back to the beginning. Just because a team wins something 5,10,15,20 etc years ago does not make it more valuable than one won 40,50, 60 years ago. They are both titles.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News