Started By
Message
re: Which SEC team claims the least % of bogus titles in football?
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:49 pm to SavageOrangeJug
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:49 pm to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
Can you tell us where the other 5 NCs magically appeared from?
Than answer the question at the end.
1983 you claimed 6...you only had 4.
You have 7 legit since then.
4+7=11
Let's say you actually had 6 in 1983.
6+7=13
They came to be because Notre Dame would claim old titles like that with math polls going back to Rockne.
At that time, Notre Dame claimed 10. After Bear died, someone updated the totals to include the same types of claims Notre Dame was using to get their 10.
And of course, they ended up with 11, just to have more than Notre Dame. Only problem is, 1941 wasn't a legit claim.
So in general, Notre Dame kind of set the tone for those types of claims.
1
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:49 pm to aspiclark
quote:Answer the questions.
yeah, that’s it man. you’re doing it, you’re actually doing it.
Can you tell us where the other 5 NCs magically appeared from?
Why is it so important to you band wagon riders to claim all those bullshite titles? WHY? I don't get it, and neither does anyone else. WHY? Why do you need this so bad?
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:51 pm to 3down10
quote:
They came to be because Notre Dame would claim old titles like that with math polls going back to Rockne.
At that time, Notre Dame claimed 10. After Bear died, someone updated the totals to include the same types of claims Notre Dame was using to get their 10.
And of course, they ended up with 11, just to have more than Notre Dame. Only problem is, 1941 wasn't a legit claim.
So in general, Notre Dame kind of set the tone for those types of claims.
So you admit it.
Alabama pulled bullshite claims about NCs out of their arse, because Notre Dame did it first?
FINALLY! A Bammer admits the claims of 18 are total and complete bullshite.
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:51 pm to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
Can you tell us where the other 5 NCs magically appeared from?
What in the hell are you blabbering about and how does this have anything to do with my very straightforward question to you? The number of titles is of no concern to me, as I mentioned in the post I made to you. You are trying to start with a predetermined answer, and work backwards in an attempt to get the answer you want. Honestly that's an insane way to view things and I worry that you're WAY too emotionally attached to this issue to discuss it rationally.
Again, I don't care what number of titles Alabama winds up with- you seem to be implying it's a lot. ALL I'm interested in hearing is your proposed system to award titles consistently across the entirety of college football. We need a simple system that doesn't allow for people to inject their opinions and emotions into the equation (like you struggle with). Can you provide that system without getting all emotional and deflecting again? Or is your identity truly tied to this issue such that this task is impossible for you?
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:52 pm to SavageOrangeJug
very easily i could, yes. as it’s easy to use google and not complicated.
it’s not important at all. you care WAY more about it than they do. which is really funny.
further, using the standards of the day, only 1941 is illegitimate. most of this conversation was about 1964. which was included in the claims of this hilariously fat fingered screenshot you keep posting in the first place.
anything else? your blood pressure…
it’s not important at all. you care WAY more about it than they do. which is really funny.
further, using the standards of the day, only 1941 is illegitimate. most of this conversation was about 1964. which was included in the claims of this hilariously fat fingered screenshot you keep posting in the first place.
anything else? your blood pressure…
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:53 pm to thatthang
Arkansas had just as much right to claim the 77 title as anyone else. The polls said Notre Dame and Bama cried foul. Arkansas never claimed it because just like everyone else we had lost a game. Even though we were a better team than Bama, Notre Dame, and Oklahoma.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:53 pm to thatthang
one thing is indisputable, by any standard, bama has a lot more than everyone else in the modern era.
hurts i know.
hurts i know.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:53 pm to thatthang
quote:I'm blathering about 5 NCs you insecure, little-dicked, inbred rednecks pulled out of thin air.
What in the hell are you blabbering about
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:54 pm to Arzrbkfan
they would…if they had won either poll but they didn’t. same as they didn’t in 64.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:55 pm to SavageOrangeJug
do you need money? would that help?
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:57 pm to aspiclark
quote:There is a 90 page thread and then this thread that say Bammers care very much about their blatant lies about NCs.
very easily i could, yes. as it’s easy to use google and not complicated.
it’s not important at all. you care WAY more about it than they do. which is really funny.
further, using the standards of the day, only 1941 is illegitimate. most of this conversation was about 1964. which was included in the claims of this hilariously fat fingered screenshot you keep posting in the first place.
anything else? your blood pressure…
I have your vagina hemorrhaging pretty hard right now.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:57 pm to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
1983 you claimed 6...you only had 4.
You have 7 legit since then.
4+7=11
Let's say you actually had 6 in 1983.
6+7=13
You can rant and rave an giggle all you want; I explained it in the other thread.
6 legit AP/UPI/Coaches championships in the 1983 media guide - 61, 64, 65, 73, 78, 79 all AP/UPI/Coaches poll champions.
6 + the 7 (92 Stallings and 09, 11, 12, 15, 17, 20 Saban championships) = 13 Major POLL CHAMPIONSHIPS.
13 + 4 Rose Bowl Championships 25, 26, 30, 34 (before major polls) = 17.
17 + 1 (most Bama fans don't count 1941) = 18
I swear little kindergarten kids could learn faster than you.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:58 pm to aspiclark
quote:Save it for a remedial English class.
do you need money? would that help?
Actually, just sign off the alter and come at with your real name.
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:59 pm to SavageOrangeJug
there it is. crying laughing emoji while actively shitting yourself weeping. beautiful.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 7:59 pm to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
So you admit it.
Alabama pulled bullshite claims about NCs out of their arse, because Notre Dame did it first?
FINALLY! A Bammer admits the claims of 18 are total and complete bullshite.
Do you think it's not known that the media guide changed and the titles were claimed retro or something?
If you just don't want to claim pre poll era polls, that's fine, make your own thread and count just those.
I'm just going based on what's been generally accepted. Notre Dames claims were accepted by the public, and that became the standard. Considering the other claims Tennessee has, the only reason they don't make the same kinds of claims in that era is because they don't have any to make. As they have no problem making claims much later.
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 8:00 pm to jatebe
quote:
4 Rose Bowl Championships 25, 26, 30, 34 (before major polls)
Such fricking bullshite.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 8:00 pm to SavageOrangeJug
extremely fricking mad
Posted on 8/7/22 at 8:01 pm to aspiclark
The only thing Bama won in 64 was a worthless opinion. Arkansas also had a few worthless opinions. But Arkansas was the only team to win all their games. Bama ended up a loser.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 8:02 pm to 3down10
quote:We're not talking about Tennessee because I don't make any bogus 6 claims and don't know any other real fans who do.
Considering the other claims Tennessee has, the only reason they don't make the same kinds of claims is because they don't have any to make.
Why is it so important to you band wagon riders to claim all those bullshite titles? WHY? I don't get it, and neither does anyone else. WHY? Why do you need this so bad?
What is it that makes you Bammers crave those inflated numbers?
Page 5 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News