Started By
Message
When was the last time a pro style offense won natty
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:21 am
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:21 am
Or just a non spread...would it be 2011 bama?
5
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:23 am to Tigerpride18
Just a guess but I’m guessing the 2015 season. The year Bama and Clemson played in Arizona. I think it was 20-5.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:23 am to Tigerpride18
2013 Florida State
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:02 am to mistaken4193
UGA with Mac Jones or Trevor Lawrence would win one this year.
It’s more about QB play than which scheme you choose.
Same deal at LSU under Miles. If you had AJ McCarron instead of Jordan Jefferson you probably win 2-3 championships.
It’s more about QB play than which scheme you choose.
Same deal at LSU under Miles. If you had AJ McCarron instead of Jordan Jefferson you probably win 2-3 championships.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:05 am to tide06
Uga doesnt run pro style anymore. That's what I've heard ,I wasn't looking close at there formations against bama ,just going by what I read on here.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:07 am to Tigerpride18
It’s definitely a mix of spread and pro style l. Almost like what south carolina does with better talent
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:10 am to Tigerpride18
Define "pro style"
21 personnel?
21 personnel?
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:11 am to RollingwiththeTide
That game was a shootout. I think Bama mainly was pro style that year but had a good number of spread elements under Kiffin.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:12 am to Tigerpride18
Jacob Coker and Alabama
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:13 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
It’s definitely a mix of spread and pro style
Any “pro style” at this point is going to include a lot of spread concepts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:22 am to Tigerpride18
If pro-style means under center then probably 2013 FSU or 2015 Alabama.
If pro-style means non-RPO/tight ends/etc then that expands quite a bit.
If pro-style means non-RPO/tight ends/etc then that expands quite a bit.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:48 am to SummerOfGeorge
I always understood pro style to be under center two backs in backfield, usually in I-formation though split I or split backfield also , one tight end two receivers
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:12 am to tide06
quote:
It’s more about QB play than which scheme you choose.
Disagree on scheme.
If you put Burrow under center last year with 2 RBs, no way he produces anything near the results we saw. And no Natty against a Spread/RPO opponent.
You need a QB who can throw and can read defenses, WRs who are ready to play, a solid RB who can catch, etc.
Spread/RPO, with the right coaches and players, is unstoppable.
Just keeping it real.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:45 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Define "pro style"
Technically anything that looks like the NFL. (PRO-style) Under center, Pistol, whatever.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:54 am to bamameister
The NFL has adopted a lot of collegiate schemes because its hard to pay 5 good O-linemen. You rarely see any 5 step or 7 step drops. Everything is out guickly within 2 seconds.
The Titans still run a lot of pro sets, because you have to respect their play action. They like to run the ball to set up their passing game. Play action is really the only way they get explosive plays in the passing game.
The Titans still run a lot of pro sets, because you have to respect their play action. They like to run the ball to set up their passing game. Play action is really the only way they get explosive plays in the passing game.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 9:16 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Disagree on scheme.
If you put Burrow under center last year with 2 RBs, no way he produces anything near the results we saw
I disagree because I don’t think offensive effectiveness is measured in points scored, but in yards per play.
A pro style offense with spread elements (see UGA or Bama this year) with the pieces LSU had last year could’ve been just as efficient from a yards per play standpoint as the spread attack you had.
Sark is running the new pro style attack in Tuscaloosa this year and the offense has been more consistent to date than what we had last year with Tua because the run game brings stability and fewer three and outs.
The cumulative effect of the game plan led to UGA abandoning the run game on offense and their defense who I think is best in the nation giving up by the 4th quarter because they were gassed and had no answers.
Bottom line with the right pieces both are effective when executed properly.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 9:29 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Disagree on scheme.
If you put Burrow under center last year with 2 RBs, no way he produces anything near the results we saw. And no Natty against a Spread/RPO opponent.
You need a QB who can throw and can read defenses, WRs who are ready to play, a solid RB who can catch, etc.
Spread/RPO, with the right coaches and players, is unstoppable.
Just keeping it real.
I agree. With how lax college officials are on calling illegal man downfield on passing plays, you really have to take advantage of the RPO to some extent in your offense or you are leaving yards and points on the table. It puts maximum pressure and confusion on the defense.
As much as I'm a fan of Mac Jones, his limitation in effectively being a threat to run is a big part of what puts him a notch below a guy like Trevor Lawrence. Lawrence's mobility and throwing ability combined with the favorable RPO rules really make it difficult to stop Clemson's offense.
Alabama can still run RPO but it's RB run focused, not QB run focused. That can still be effective but when you have QB run, RB run, and pass options ALL clicking in the RPO it's obviously the biggest advantage.
Scheme matters a lot.
Posted on 10/22/20 at 2:32 pm to bamameister
quote:
Technically anything that looks like the NFL
What?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News