Started By
Message
Was 2017 Auburn better than the 2010 Bama team?
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:27 am
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:27 am
Serious question here. Do you think that last year's edition of Auburn was better than our 10-3 team of 2010?
We had the expectations to start the season and finished miserably (with a huge bowl win though). 2017 Auburn started a little rough but was a very good team towards the end (until first week of December) and then ran out of gas.
Which team was better?
We had the expectations to start the season and finished miserably (with a huge bowl win though). 2017 Auburn started a little rough but was a very good team towards the end (until first week of December) and then ran out of gas.
Which team was better?
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:28 am to ColoBama
Which team lost to Ed Orgeron?
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:28 am to craigbiggio
Damn cb, that was quickly put into perspective. Good point.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:29 am to craigbiggio
We did lose a game to Leslie that I didn't feel like we should have. I still have resentments for that game.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:30 am to ColoBama
2017 Auburn was the better team and also won the division, but 2017 Auburn also would've probably lost the 2010 Capital One bowl due to Malzahn checking out following the conclusion of the regular season.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:34 am to AuburnPanic40
To me, Auburn is good at getting up for one or two teams every year and winning in inexplicable fashion. Then claiming how great of a team they were.
So yes, they are taking over LSU's spot from a years back. But they're just doing it in more dramatic fashion (minus the toss dive).
So yes, they are taking over LSU's spot from a years back. But they're just doing it in more dramatic fashion (minus the toss dive).
This post was edited on 5/18/18 at 10:35 am
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:47 am to SAINTS0321
quote:
Helll no
Any reasons for this conclusion other than pure fandom?
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:49 am to ColoBama
Well if the game were at Jordan Hare then probably, but if not then the 2010 Bama team is better.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:50 am to ColoBama
Both teams had holes.
I think it would be extremely hard for the bama O to be productive against the 2017 Auburn D.
For that reason, I take Auburn for the W.
I think it would be extremely hard for the bama O to be productive against the 2017 Auburn D.
For that reason, I take Auburn for the W.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:51 am to ColoBama
A healthy 2010 Alabama is better than 2017 Auburn.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:52 am to ColoBama
AU had key injuries in the SECCG that fricked us up in that game. If KJ is healthy, that game turns out the same way the first UGA game did. probably closer score.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:54 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
I think it would be extremely hard for the bama O to be productive against the 2017 Auburn D.
Why?
Bama had the 22nd ranked total offense and 18th ranked scoring offense. They weren’t bad. And if Bama played like they did against MSU in the bowl game, they would definitely win.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:57 am to 1BamaRTR
quote:
Bama had the 22nd ranked total offense and 18th ranked scoring offense.
A shitty, I mean absolutely shitty, 2010 Auburn D dominated bama in the second half that year. The 2017 Auburn D was light years better.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 11:10 am to MrAUTigers
I wouldn’t call that 2010 AU Defense shitty. They weren’t a great defense but they were pretty salty when they had to be in the 2nd half of multiple games. A bunch of gamers when the moment called for it.
This post was edited on 5/18/18 at 11:11 am
Posted on 5/18/18 at 11:14 am to FairhopeTider
The run D was pretty stout, but the pass D was atrocious. That D made every QB look like a Heisman candidate.
ETA You are right about the second half of games. In most games, the second half D looked the exact opposite of the first half D..........but you could still throw all over us that year.
Mariotta (sp) threw for 374 yards in the NC game.
ETA You are right about the second half of games. In most games, the second half D looked the exact opposite of the first half D..........but you could still throw all over us that year.
Mariotta (sp) threw for 374 yards in the NC game.
This post was edited on 5/18/18 at 11:17 am
Posted on 5/18/18 at 11:14 am to ColoBama
If both teams were completely healthy and played on a neutral field, the 2010 Bama team would have mauled the 17 Auburn team.
42-14 or something like that
42-14 or something like that
This post was edited on 5/18/18 at 11:16 am
Posted on 5/18/18 at 11:16 am to ColoBama
Hard to say.
2010 Bama was more talented and had more potential. It was one of the most talented teams Saban has ever had.
But 2010 Bama had some mental issues or something. They never improved as the year went on. Then we saw what they were capable of in the first half of the IB (utter domination of anyone), then in the second half we saw them fold and get destroyed as thoroughly as they dominated the first half.
I would not call either team better than the other.
2010 Bama was more talented and had more potential. It was one of the most talented teams Saban has ever had.
But 2010 Bama had some mental issues or something. They never improved as the year went on. Then we saw what they were capable of in the first half of the IB (utter domination of anyone), then in the second half we saw them fold and get destroyed as thoroughly as they dominated the first half.
I would not call either team better than the other.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 11:18 am to remaster916
quote:
If both teams were completely healthy and played on a neutral field, the 2010 Bama team would have mauled the 17 Auburn team.
You do realize the 2017 Auburn team mauled the bama NC team, right?
Posted on 5/18/18 at 11:20 am to MrAUTigers
That Bama team never played at full strength until the bowl game, and I honestly thought Kirk Cousins might die. But there's more to it than talent, obviously.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News