Started By
Message
re: Wade and Miller wiretaps ruled "irrelevant" in federal trial.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:41 am to FightingTigers138
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:41 am to FightingTigers138
This has been a VERY good week for LSU.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:43 am to ibldprplgld
quote:lol at you thinking chain of custody related to voice recordings would be a major issue in an NCAA hearing.
That's a major chain of custody issue and LSU's counsel will jump all over it...and win.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 11:44 am
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:43 am to FightingTigers138
quote:
you are stupid.
They have been wrong at every turn.
Wade, Smart, Alleva, Woodward, the trial, etc.,
A bunch of DUMDUMS.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:44 am to PearlJam
quote:it would be a major issue in an actual lawsuit if the NCAA willingly accepts illegally obtained evidence. The NCAA is not going to go down that road. Don't be dumb
lol at you think chain of custody related to voice recordings would be a major issue in an NCAA hearing.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 11:45 am
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:45 am to lsufball19
quote:No it wouldn't as long as the NCAA wasn't part of any illegality in obtaining the evidence.
it would be a major issue in an actual lawsuit of the NCAA willingly accepts illegally obtained evidence. Don't be dumb
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 11:46 am
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:45 am to FightingTigers138
quote:
If you think that the NCAA is going to punish LSU with no evidence, then you are stupid.
Why do you think it's impossible for the NCAA to dig up new evidence once they begin their investigation of LSU?
Seems like a lot of LSU baws are celebrating a bit early. It ain't over yet. Hell, it hasn't even started yet.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:46 am to PearlJam
quote:
No it wouldn't as long as the NCAA was part of any illegality in obtaining the evidence.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:46 am to PearlJam
quote:
No it wouldn't
yes it would
quote:
as the NCAA was part of any illegality in obtaining the evidence.
Do y'all ever get tired of being proven wrong on legal issues by me? I mean everything I've said would happen has happened, yet y'all still continue to dig your heels in. It's incredible. I'm sorry the yahoo article wasn't the game, set, match you hoped it would be, I truly am.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:48 am to secuniversity
quote:LOL, no they can't.
No, the NCAA can still use it.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:48 am to lsufball19
Let's be honest.
The NCAA does not want any of this period.
The tournament is their money maker, and can you imagine the shite that goes on with the really long standing blue bloods?
I am sure they would love to say their hands are tied, because digging into this could also lead to digging into the shoe market and the whole system where everyone knows money is changing hands. .And that would be a nightmare for them.
The NCAA does not want any of this period.
The tournament is their money maker, and can you imagine the shite that goes on with the really long standing blue bloods?
I am sure they would love to say their hands are tied, because digging into this could also lead to digging into the shoe market and the whole system where everyone knows money is changing hands. .And that would be a nightmare for them.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:49 am to lsufball19
The NCAA can use any evidence it has in it's hearing without respect to a chain of custody issue. No lawsuit against the NCAA for using such evidence would be successful as long as the NCAA didn't itself commit a crime in obtaining the evidence.
Not to mention, the NCAA can easily question the other parties involved in the calls to obtain similar evidence and isn't solely reliant on having the wiretaps.
Not to mention, the NCAA can easily question the other parties involved in the calls to obtain similar evidence and isn't solely reliant on having the wiretaps.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 11:51 am
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:49 am to lsufball19
quote:You're wasting your time.
Do y'all ever get tired of being proven wrong on legal issues by me? I mean everything I've said would happen has happened, yet y'all still continue to dig your heels in. It's incredible. I'm sorry the yahoo article wasn't the game, set, match you hoped it would be, I truly am.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:50 am to lsufball19
quote:could you link me to any legal issue you have ever proven me wrong on?
Do y'all ever get tired of being proven wrong on legal issues by me?
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:51 am to higgs_boson
agreed, there is no way they want to investigate 50 programs and several blue bloods. The "coalition" Emmert put together was nothing more than a show too make people think they care. And with the new scandals with admission departments...that's the best thing the NCAA could have asked for because they can shift public outrage to those issues being more important right now.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:53 am to PearlJam
quote:
could you link me to any legal issue you have ever proven me wrong on?
Pull up any thread on this topic and read what i had to say about what will likely happen from a legal perspective and why. I have been 100% spot on about this case long before any of the rulings or motions were filed. The NCAA is not going to get any of this evidence from the FBI and they're not going to obtain it illegally and use it in an investigation. They're just not. You really need to drop it.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 11:54 am
Posted on 4/19/19 at 11:57 am to PearlJam
quote:
lol at you thinking chain of custody related to voice recordings would be a major issue in an NCAA hearing.
Lol at you for thinking the NCAA is above the law. They may have a lot of authority when it comes to universities, but they don't when it comes to Federal evidence and the FBI.
God the stupidity on this site is astounding.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 12:01 pm to PearlJam
quote:
The NCAA can use any evidence it has in it's hearing without respect to a chain of custody issue. No lawsuit against the NCAA for using such evidence would be successful as long as the NCAA didn't itself commit a crime in obtaining the evidence.
The NCAA doesn't have any evidence. If they did, why would they file motions to get it from the FBI like they did (and were denied)? They don't have shite and they aren't getting shite from the FBI.
It would really help if you mental midgets would get something right instead of just pulling shite out of your asses.
Posted on 4/19/19 at 12:04 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:you are out of your element. Nothing I said indicated they were above the law. Chain of custody wouldn't be an issue in an NCAA hearing and wouldn't be a successful basis for a civil lawsuit against the NCAA.
Lol at you for thinking the NCAA is above the law
quote:I agree with this, but not in the way you are implying. You are talking about issues clearly outside your area of experience and knowledge.
God the stupidity on this site is astounding
Posted on 4/19/19 at 12:06 pm to lsufball19
quote:So, you haven't proved me wrong on any legal issue.
Pull up any thread on this topic and read what i had to say about what will likely happen from a legal perspective and why
quote:I agree.
The NCAA is not going to get any of this evidence from the FBI and they're not going to obtain it illegally and use it in an investigation
quote:Drop what? I merely laughed at the idiot talking about chain of custody issues.
They're just not. You really need to drop it.
The NCAA will still investigate and there is potential they can get the same information from other sources.
This post was edited on 4/19/19 at 12:07 pm
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News