Started By
Message

Updated NCAA Baseball Tournament All-Time Records (SEC)

Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:32 pm
Posted by Sean Bean
USA
Member since May 2018
490 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:32 pm
This is updated through this year's Super Regionals.

NCAA Tournament Appearances

1. Mississippi St.: 35
2. Florida: 34
2. Texas A&M: 34
4. South Carolina: 32
5. LSU: 31
6. Arkansas: 30
7. Ole Miss: 22
7. Missouri: 22
9. Alabama: 21
9. Auburn: 21
11. Vanderbilt: 17
12. Georgia: 11
13. Tennessee: 9
14. Kentucky: 7

All-Time Records


1. LSU: 154-63 0.710%
2. South Carolina: 136-68 0.667%
3. Tennessee: 31-19 0.620%
4. Georgia: 48-30 0.615%
5. Florida: 113-74 0.604%
5. Vanderbilt: 58-38 0.604%
7. Alabama: 62-43 0.590%
8. Mississippi St.: 105-79 0.571%
9. Arkansas: 79-64 0.552%
10. Ole Miss: 55-48 0.534%
11. Auburn: 49-45 0.521%
12. Texas A&M: 82-76 0.519%
13. Kentucky: 15-15 0.500%
14. Missouri: 43-45 0.489%


If you notice any errors, please let me know. I'm currently in the process of building this database by extracting from PDFs, and it isn't very fun.

*MAJOR EDIT; And a HUGE thank you*
Initially, I only counted regional wins. That was 100% my fault for getting too excited about this new project; but the NCAA breaks down their record book in an odd way, separating regional, super regional, and CWS records entirely. Never mixing any of them. I only extracted the data out of the "regional wins/loss" section originally. Apologies.

One more thing, there could be a few records still a little off here, but only because the NCAA record books do not count any wins/losses from post-season games played before 1954. Here is the excerpt from that section: "Before 1954, district playoff games were not considered a part of the national collegiate baseball championship. As a result, only district/playoff games from 1954 to the present, are included in the record column."

Since I'm doing a database for all NCAA Baseball teams, I wanted to follow what the NCAA dictates as "a part of the NCAA Baseball Championship" so nothing gets crossed up in the DB in the future. I know individual schools all have records showing those games prior to '54, but again, for consistency purposes I followed what the NCAA goes by.

Also, this is a major work in progress. Any corrections are 100% welcome.
This post was edited on 6/13/18 at 1:07 am
Posted by Random MsState Fan
Member since Jun 2018
1657 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

NCAA Tournament Appearances
1. Mississippi St.: 35

Posted by dukeg
Member since Apr 2018
621 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

NCAA Tournament Appearances
1. Mississippi St.: 35



*Number of national championships: ZERO*
Posted by Slackaveli
Fayetteville
Member since Jul 2017
15163 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:40 pm to
Big6


1. Mississippi St.: 35
2. Florida: 34
2. Texas A&M: 34
4. South Carolina: 32
5. LSU: 31
6. Arkansas: 30
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71114 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

quote:
NCAA Tournament Appearances
1. Mississippi St.: 35



*Number of national championships: ZERO*



Cold blooded man. Damn!
Posted by Random MsState Fan
Member since Jun 2018
1657 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:43 pm to
What team are you a fan of?
Posted by Pygthagorean Theorem
Member since Aug 2015
7823 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:45 pm to
What happened again in 1985 with the GOAT team?
Posted by BobMayonnaise
Memphis
Member since Feb 2009
1371 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

NCAA Tournament Appearances 1. Mississippi St.: 35


To put that into perspective, Texas is about to make their 36th CWS appearance.
Posted by dukeg
Member since Apr 2018
621 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 7:34 pm to
Louisiana State University.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46395 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 7:47 pm to
In terms of CWS performance, here is how I would rank top 25 teams all-time:

1. Texas (36 appearances, 6 titles)
2. USC (21 appearances, 12 titles - last apperance 2001)
3. Miami (25 appearances, 4 titles - last apperance 2016)
4. Arizona St (22 appearances, 5 titles - last apperance 2010)
5. LSU (18 appearances, 6 titles - last appearance 2017)
6. Cal State Fullerton (18 appearances, 4 titles - last apperance 2017)
7. Arizona (17 appearances, 4 titles - last appearance 2016)
8. FSU (22 appearances, 0 titles - last appearance 2017)
9. Oklahoma St (20 appearances, 1 title - last apperance 2016)
10. Stanford (16 appearances, 2 titles - last apperance 2008)
11. South Carolina (11 appearances, 2 titles - last appearance 2012)
12. Florida (12 appearances, 1 title) - Can leap frog South Carolina by winning 2018 CWS
13. Oklahoma (10 appearances, 2 titles - last appearance 2010)
14. Clemson (12 appearances, 0 titles - last appearance 2010)
15. UNC (11 appearances, 0 titles) - Can leap frog Clemson by winning 2018 CWS
16. Oregon St (7 appearances, 2 titles) - Can move up to #14 by winning 2018 CWS
17. Michigan (7 appearances, 2 titles - last appearance 1984)
18. Mississippi St (10 appearances, 0 titles) - Can move up to #15 by winning 2018 CWS
19. Minnesota (5 appearances, 3 titles - last appearance 1977)
20. Arkansas (9 appearances, 0 titles) - Can move up to #17 by winning 2018 CWS
21. California (6 appearances, 2 titles - last appearance 2011)
22. Rice (7 appearances, 1 title - last appearance 2008)
23. Wichita St (7 appearances, 1 title - last appearance 1996)
24. Georgia (6 appearances, 1 title - last appearance 2008)
25. Mizzou (6 appearances, 1 title - last appearance 1964)

If you want to pair it down to teams that have appeared in Omaha in the Super Regional era (post 1999):

1. Texas (36 appearances, 6 titles)
2. USC (21 appearances, 12 titles - last apperance 2001)
3. Miami (25 appearances, 4 titles - last apperance 2016)
4. Arizona St (22 appearances, 5 titles - last apperance 2010)
5. LSU (18 appearances, 6 titles - last appearance 2017)
6. Cal State Fullerton (18 appearances, 4 titles - last apperance 2017)
7. Arizona (17 appearances, 4 titles - last appearance 2016)
8. FSU (22 appearances, 0 titles - last appearance 2017)
9. Oklahoma St (20 appearances, 1 title - last apperance 2016)
10. Stanford (16 appearances, 2 titles - last apperance 2008)
11. South Carolina (11 appearances, 2 titles - last appearance 2012)
12. Florida (12 appearances, 1 title) - Can leap frog South Carolina by winning 2018 CWS
13. Oklahoma (10 appearances, 2 titles - last appearance 2010)
14. Clemson (12 appearances, 0 titles - last appearance 2010)
15. UNC (11 appearances, 0 titles) - Can leap frog Clemson by winning 2018 CWS
16. Oregon St (7 appearances, 2 titles) - Can move up to #14 by winning 2018 CWS
17. Mississippi St (10 appearances, 0 titles) - Can move up to #15 by winning 2018 CWS
18. Arkansas (9 appearances, 0 titles) - Can move up to #17 by winning 2018 CWS
19. California (6 appearances, 2 titles - last appearance 2011)
20. Rice (7 appearances, 1 title - last appearance 2008)
21. Georgia (6 appearances, 1 title - last appearance 2008)
22. UCLA (5 apperances, 1 title - last appearance 2013)
23. Texas A&M (6 appearances, 0 titles - last appearance 2017)
24. Ole Miss (5 apperances, 0 titles - last appearance 2014)

25. TCU (5 apperances, 0 titles - last appearance 2017)
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 7:57 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64455 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 7:51 pm to
CWS performance? If that’s the case, why is Texas #1? 6 titles in 36 appearances doesn’t look like they perform all that well in Omaha, generally and comparatively speaking. I’d put USC #1 although they haven’t been much of anything in 20 years. They would be followed by LSU, Arizona State, Texas, Miami.

You also can’t have FSU above South Carolina or Stanford. 2 national titles trump all those appearances with nothing to show for it

Your second list probably should just show their records since 1999. Would make more sense IMO
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 8:17 pm
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46395 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:04 pm to
I'm not rating it by winning percentage in Omaha so much as quantifying making it to Omaha as an achievement and bonus points for winning the whole thing. Making it to Omaha is an achievement in and of itself and making it 36 times and only winning it 6 is still making 11 times more than the next team and tied for 2nd for all time number of titles. Texas is the best college baseball program around.

Basically, I assigned 1 point for a CWS appearance and 2 points for a title
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64455 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:06 pm to
Sounds more like an NCAAT performance list rather than a CWS performance list then
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46395 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

You also can’t have FSU above South Carolina or Stanford. 2 national titles trump all those appearances with nothing to show for it


Trust me, I'd love to bump FSU and Clemson and UNC down the list for never having won a title but, c;mon, making it to Omaha 22 times is still a sign of success in college baseball. That's still 11 more appearances than South Carolina and 6 more than Stanford. Plus FSU has made it to Omaha more recently than both (Carolina in 2012, Stanford in 2008).

quote:

Your second list probably should just show their records since 1999. Would make more sense IMO

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeah not really interested in doing that kind of leg work
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46395 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Sounds more like an NCAAT performance list rather than a CWS performance list then


Attach whatever meaning to it you want but I think most any college baseball fan would agree that making the CWS is going to result in a banner on your outfield wall same as it would if you won the whole thing.

I mean I could add a metric for # of times finishing as a runner-up in Omaha which may move a couple of teams up or down. But going by a winning percentage means that UGA has the same winning percentage in Omaha as Texas and I'm not about to say that those two programs are anywhere close.
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 8:12 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64455 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Trust me, I'd love to bump FSU and Clemson and UNC down the list for never having won a title but, c;mon, making it to Omaha 22 times is still a sign of success in college baseball.

Didn't say it wasn't, but 2 national titles means more than 22 appearances. If they had 4 or 5 total appearances, then yeah maybe, but that's not the case for either of those schools.
quote:

That's still 11 more appearances than South Carolina and 6 more than Stanford. Plus FSU has made it to Omaha more recently than both (Carolina in 2012, Stanford in 2008).

well this is an all-time list, so how long ago they appeared shouldn't matter. If recency was a thing, all but one of USC's 12 titles and majority of their appearances came 40 years ago, so why are they even #2? But seriously, FSU having 6 more appearances than Stanford doesn't trump 2 fewer national titles, just no way
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 8:11 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26233 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:10 pm to
I loved LSU-Texas in 2009 finals. I’ll never forget being in the corner at Rosenblatt Game1 and watching DJ’s double land just fair to tie the game in the 9th. It was awesome.

Posted by TOFTR
Tennissippi
Member since Jan 2016
2925 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:12 pm to
A title should be worth at least 3x (if not more) what an Omaha appearance is worth, which itself should be worth at least 2x what making the postseason should be worth. Like, is 5 Omaha appearances really worth more than 1 national title?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64455 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

I mean I could add a metric for # of times finishing as a runner-up in Omaha which may move a couple of teams up or down. But going by a winning percentage means that UGA has the same winning percentage in Omaha as Texas and I'm not about to say that those two programs are anywhere close.


That's not what I'm saying. You titled this list "CWS performance." To me, that means how teams have performed at the College World Series. However, based on what you said was your basis was that getting to Omaha was an accomplishment in and of itself and that national titles were a bonus. Given those parameters, this sounds more like an NCAAT performance list since since we're only talking about getting there (don't have to win any games in Omaha to get credit) and then talking about winning it. It just doesn't make sense to call it an CWS Performance ranking if winning percentage, total wins, etc in Omaha don't go into the metric.
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 8:15 pm
Posted by TonyMontana
Member since Jul 2017
1169 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 8:15 pm to
The random idiot loves opening himself up.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter