Started By
Message
re: UPDATE..Bogus National Title claims: Alabama claims 18 but most are questionable
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:05 pm to jchamil
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:05 pm to jchamil
quote:
but that 2003 title was still split
No it wasn't
The BCS was and is the only recognized title claim since it's creation. They played in the BCSNCG.
1
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:05 pm to The Spleen
Exactly. Who cares what the legit number is? Anyone you slice it, it's more than anyone else. You can dispute our titles, you can't dispute Bama is the GOAT 
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:05 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
So 2003 and 2007 were not legit
those years are a disgrace to the sport. If Chicken assumes that most years there are no legit champions, he has to concede that 2003 and 2007 fall into that same category.
his bias and ignorance are on full display.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:05 pm to Chicken
So Alabama currently has 2.5 times as many NCs as the next closest team, and after this year will have 3 times as many NCs as the next closest team? All this AND Notre Dame is left completely out? I'll allow it.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:06 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Chicken master troll.
How is it trolling when it's true. Arkansas fans threads are trolling this is not a troll. The SEC rant has become a troll fest and doesn't understand what a troll is anymore.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:06 pm to bamafan425
quote:
Why don't you use the AP rankings for 1998 to present?
Because it has just as much merit as allbamadoesiswin's opinion
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:06 pm to genro
quote:People believe what they are told. Prior to the BCS, most title claims were a farce. It is why we have the BCS now.
That doesn't answer my question.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:06 pm to CatFan81
quote:
The perfect gif for this thread.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:07 pm to CP3LSU25
ok so Alabama is still the greatest college football program in the history of football, whats the big deal? you feel better not being so far behind?
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:07 pm to genro
quote:
Exactly. Who cares what the legit number is? Anyone you slice it, it's more than anyone else. You can dispute our titles, you can't dispute Bama is the GOAT
Princeton 28 NCs
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:08 pm to Chicken
Jesus christ this is stupid
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:08 pm to Chicken
Pfft. The ole, "You're one of the best programs ever, if not the best, but not by as much as you think!" argument.
A) If you let a fan spout off about National Championships and all you do is laugh at them. They've won. They're already in your head.
B) How about we solve it this way. Simply put, Alabama is better than you were yesterday, they're better than you today AND odds are - better than you'll be tomorrow.
Admin or not - get serious.
A) If you let a fan spout off about National Championships and all you do is laugh at them. They've won. They're already in your head.
B) How about we solve it this way. Simply put, Alabama is better than you were yesterday, they're better than you today AND odds are - better than you'll be tomorrow.
Admin or not - get serious.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:08 pm to VermilionTiger
Then claim all titles prior to 1998 were bogus.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:08 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:right, which furthers the point that most title claims prior to the BCS are ridiculous.
I'll just add that NC used to be awarded before games. Also certain schools refused to play in bowl games. So in some years it would have been impossible to have 1 vs 2.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:08 pm to Chicken
So, under your system Alabama STILL has twice as many titles as any other team, including more titles in the last 4 years than any other team has in the entire history of their pathetic programs?
I can dig it.
I can dig it.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:08 pm to Chicken
I'm not sure why our 96 title doesn't count. It was won on the field under the Bowl Alliance, the predecessor to the BCS.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:09 pm to Chicken
Well anyways. I like this thread. I like how idiots - on both sides - think it's somehow a shot at Bama. A non-troll disguised as a troll, I guess. Well played.
This post was edited on 11/6/13 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:09 pm to narddogg81
Bama fans sho is sensitive. I thought for sure the ole miss fans would be the most pissed about this thread.
LSU had to give up an ancient, illegitimate title, too. What's the big deal?
LSU had to give up an ancient, illegitimate title, too. What's the big deal?
This post was edited on 11/6/13 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:09 pm to BloodSweat&Beers
quote:Still not getting it. You should read the OP.
BloodSweat&Beers
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:10 pm to Chicken
What is most significant about 1998 is that all FBS schools agreed and signed on (literally) to the process, whether they like the outcome or not. That's why there should be no complaints about invites (USC 2003, AU 2004, LSU 2011, etc). Like it or not, everyone signed on.
Page 5 of 117
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News