Started By
Message
There are only a few college football programs capable of building dynasties.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:35 pm
Thus far, Alabama is the only program that has built a dynasty in the SEC. We will find out if UGA will join that exclusive club in one week.
21
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:36 pm to Uga Alum
One back to back is not a dynasty.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:36 pm to Uga Alum
Two titles don’t equal a dynasty. You need at least three.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:37 pm to Night Vision
quote:
One back to back is not a dynasty.
This.
Army had back-to-back national championships in the mid-40s and were never heard from again.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:37 pm to Uga Alum
Georgia wins 1 championship in 40 years of getting clapped and their fans come here talking about dynasties
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:37 pm to AHM21
Not true. Back-to-back is the hardest thing to do in college football by far.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:38 pm to Uga Alum
Winning or losing one game does not a dynasty make or unmake.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:38 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
Back-to-back is the hardest thing to do in college football by far.
Sure.
But that still doesn't make it a dynasty.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:39 pm to Ingeniero
LSU can’t sustain enough continued success to ever have a shot at back-to-back. Whenever you win it’s a fluke. You’re a slightly more successful Auburn. Kirby has actually built a program. We will be in position for a 3-pete next year.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:40 pm to Uga Alum
depends on what you mean by dynasty.
I would argue since 2000, LSU and Alabama have been the only "dynasty" programs in the SEC able to build multiple championship winners. Difference, LSU has done it with 3 coaches, Bama with 1.
Hell UGA has a mulligan Natty... This is the their chance for a legit title.
I would argue since 2000, LSU and Alabama have been the only "dynasty" programs in the SEC able to build multiple championship winners. Difference, LSU has done it with 3 coaches, Bama with 1.
Hell UGA has a mulligan Natty... This is the their chance for a legit title.
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:40 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
Back-to-back is the hardest thing to do in college football by far.
I would argue a back to back heisman winner would be harder
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:41 pm to FreddieMac
Lol winning three nattys over the course of 20 years is not a dynasty. Too far apart.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:41 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
LSU can’t sustain enough continued success to ever have a shot at back-to-back. Whenever you win it’s a fluke.
LSU has sustained success just fine. It took UGA 40 years to win another title. You don’t go from perennial chokers to a dynasty in 2 years, sorry.
If UGA wins 3 titles in a 5-6 year span, then you can start having that conversation
This post was edited on 1/2/23 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:41 pm to Uga Alum
Georgia fans pls
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:43 pm to Uga Alum
Dude, for the love of OSU missed FGs, please stop starting so many threads.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:43 pm to AHM21
Agreed..we still have to win the 2nd one before we can even discuss the possibility
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:45 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Georgia
quote:
their fans
This clown is an alter, not a UGA fan. Their posters here aren't this stupid.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:45 pm to FreddieMac
quote:
Hell UGA has a mulligan Natty
This is what not living in reality looks like everyone
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:45 pm to Uga Alum
It's getting easier to pull for TCU.
Page 1 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News