Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M assuming the W against LSU in Baton Rouge
Posted on 5/26/13 at 5:12 pm to wadewilson
Posted on 5/26/13 at 5:12 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Jamarcus is better in that his career best season in yards, completion %, and QB rating are all lower than Manziel Tha God's trial run...
That's on you if you can't understand that. I added an apostrophe and the word "and" after the Oxford comma to help you
0
Posted on 5/26/13 at 5:12 pm to FormMorm
quote:
Why don't you just post a picture of a little girl blowing fairy dust or
It's a baptism of stupid, and you need one, so here you go.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 5:15 pm to wadewilson
Born again at your stupidity level, i'm ready to talk.
Les Miles is the best coach in the country.
Mettenberger is going to put it together and kill this year.
Jamarcus Russell is twice the QB JFF is, even though in 3 season I doubt he has 2x the production.
How'd I do?
Les Miles is the best coach in the country.
Mettenberger is going to put it together and kill this year.
Jamarcus Russell is twice the QB JFF is, even though in 3 season I doubt he has 2x the production.
How'd I do?
Posted on 5/26/13 at 5:15 pm to FormMorm
And Kentucky will still suck.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 5:16 pm to FormMorm
quote:
Les Miles is the best coach in the country.
Mettenberger is going to put it together and kill this year.
Jamarcus Russell is twice the QB JFF is
That's better.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 5:52 pm to RealityTiger
quote:
Posted by RealityTiger And Kentucky will still suck.
The Rants daily dose of reality brought you by:
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:30 pm to DWag215
To LSU, JFF has not been "great." This thread has been about TAMU assuming the W against LSU in Baton Rouge, not about whether JFF is great against other teams.
So, the evidence/argument that he's been great against others does NOT prove that he should roll over the Tigers in BTR, after losing at College Station the year before, and not having a "great" game in the process.
So, the evidence/argument that he's been great against others does NOT prove that he should roll over the Tigers in BTR, after losing at College Station the year before, and not having a "great" game in the process.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:36 pm to BYULSUalum
Johnny Football has never lost a revenge game
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:40 pm to Big Kat
quote:
Johnny Football has never lost a revenge game
Well said.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:45 pm to BYULSUalum
quote:
To LSU, JFF has not been "great." This thread has been about TAMU assuming the W against LSU in Baton Rouge, not about whether JFF is great against other teams.
So, the evidence/argument that he's been great against others does NOT prove that he should roll over the Tigers in BTR, after losing at College Station the year before, and not having a "great" game in the process
I think the Johnny Manziel that played against Florida was not the same player that put up the greatest performance in the history of every single bowl game ever played. I think the one that played LSU was not his top performance, and given what he did to a defense better than LSU's in Tuscaloosa not too long after that, I think it is naive for LSU to think that their 2013 defense, which is simply a regression in talent from last year is going to repeat their performance. I'm sorry swamp kittens only want to use one game to predict what he we will do next year. Actually I'm not. It shows you are scared. And you should be.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:47 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote from TbirdSpur2010: Oh I wasn't arguing that--your fellow LSUfan had just said that the first freshman to win the Heisman was not necessarily great, then offered up that weaksauce response when I called him out on it.
Just your standard, garden variety moving-the-goalposts :rivalry: smack
_______________________________________________
He had a great season; that does not make him necessarily great, and he has proven nothing to LSU. You and others are counting the W in Baton Rouge even before the season has started, and even after having JFF lose to LSU and play lousy while doing it, at home.
My point, Mizz Ou, is that the W is not a given, and until he wins in Baton Rouge, he is not "great" TO US.
Just your standard, garden variety moving-the-goalposts :rivalry: smack
_______________________________________________
He had a great season; that does not make him necessarily great, and he has proven nothing to LSU. You and others are counting the W in Baton Rouge even before the season has started, and even after having JFF lose to LSU and play lousy while doing it, at home.
My point, Mizz Ou, is that the W is not a given, and until he wins in Baton Rouge, he is not "great" TO US.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:50 pm to TeLeFaWx
Your team must really blow to be beaten by a bunch of "swamp kittens"
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:51 pm to TeLeFaWx
TeLeFaWx: The only direct evidence we have on the subject of LSU v TAMU with JFF is the game last year. Once again, the point is: Y'all probably shouldn't automatically put the LSU game in the W column just yet.
But then again, from what I just read from you, you already have.
But then again, from what I just read from you, you already have.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:51 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
TeLeFaWx
Why do you keep calling us swamp kittens??? What are you 10?
Texas A&M= little longhorns, little Texas, Texas jr, Arkansas jr, the run aways, little man syndrome unversity.
Which one of these dumb names do you like?
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:55 pm to ctiger69
Quote: Why do you keep calling us swamp kittens??? What are you 10?
Texas A&M= little longhorns, little Texas, Texas jr, Arkansas jr, the run aways, little man syndrome unversity.
Which one of these dumb names do you like?
_________________________________________
After having spent time in College Station, and cf their coeds with LSU's, I vote that they be called "Texas A&M Haggies"
Texas A&M= little longhorns, little Texas, Texas jr, Arkansas jr, the run aways, little man syndrome unversity.
Which one of these dumb names do you like?
_________________________________________
After having spent time in College Station, and cf their coeds with LSU's, I vote that they be called "Texas A&M Haggies"
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:58 pm to BYULSUalum
It's a bigger insult to the Aggies if you associate them as the inferior university in the state of Texas. They become butt hurt. I guess this kid is asking for a nick name. He won't give it up.
This post was edited on 5/26/13 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:03 pm to ctiger69
Good point, ctiger69.
How 'bout, Texas A&M Shorthorns?
How 'bout, Texas A&M Shorthorns?
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:06 pm to BYULSUalum
quote:
Good point, ctiger69. How 'bout, Texas A&M Shorthorns?
That is a good idea. If I see swamp kittens one more time I will refer to the Aggies as the Shorthorns or little long horns for one month. I will post often in all Aggie threads.
Bookmarked!
This post was edited on 5/26/13 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:19 pm to ctiger69
quote:
I will post often in all Aggie threads
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:22 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
LSU fans are delusional. They lost all 22 starters and A&M bring back their whole team plus jesus christ himself. That game last year you're talking about was a bad dream, it never really happened. Your recruiting has been terrible and you don't develop your players so they regress.
77-0 ags
77-0 ags
Page 12 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News