Started By
Message
locked post

Tennessee vs Oregon highlights 9/11/2010

Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:01 pm
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:01 pm
LINK

Tennessee OL had 5 combined starts (the least in the NCAA) but put up 120 rushing yards in 1st quarter alone.
Posted by A_Leather_Glove
Behind a podium
Member since Oct 2012
1192 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:02 pm to
Vols outgain Oregon
Posted by Klongdawg
Member since Oct 2010
8293 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:02 pm to
and?
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
64951 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:02 pm to
and then somehow lost by 35.

Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42346 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:03 pm to
So what is going to be considered as a win in this year's game?

Losing by 28 or so?
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

and?


then they destroyed UT in the second half. UT had like 65 scholarship players on the roster. no depth and almost no upper-classmen
Posted by NorthGAVol
Member since Sep 2011
8939 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

and?


This year
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:11 pm to
Oregon had trouble with the unbalanced formations and then figured it out.

That team in 2010 gave up a lot of yards due to being undersized in the first half and then rotation and conditioning kicked in. Go look at their box scores.


3 years later Oregon's defense is completely different.
Posted by NorthGAVol
Member since Sep 2011
8939 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:20 pm to
I'm just kidding. Oregon will kick the shite out of us. Unrustle your jimmies.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:22 pm to
I am not rustled. We did give up a lot of running yards in 2010.
Posted by bamawriter
Nashville, TN
Member since Apr 2009
3162 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:22 pm to
Didn't watch.

I'm not into snuff films.
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:26 pm to
LINK

Oregon has senior-laden D-line and they're way bigger than 3 years ago. it might be the best Oregon D-line ever. Not looking good for UT.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:29 pm to
Those weights are all off. Buckner at 230.
Posted by NorthGAVol
Member since Sep 2011
8939 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

I am not rustled. We did give up a lot of running yards in 2010.


I'll be honest for a minute. I do think that Tennessee will be able to run the ball on Oregon. Very well actually. I'm not giving UT much of a chance here but the only way we can stay in this game is if our offense can produce some long arse drives (7 minutes or longer) and run the ball down UO's throat. The less pass attempts for Worley the better imo.

I do expect Worley to have a horrendous game and Oregon to win by 17-28 points. You guys are probably the worst matchup for us on our schedule this year.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:36 pm to
It will be a good measuring stick for our defensive front. The defensive front has reached elite levels and we get to see on Saturday if that is bias or legit.

Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

120 rushing yards in 1st quarter alone.



Pic of your shirt?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:40 pm to
Tennessee had a knack for playing tough for a half in the Derek Dooley era before falling apart in the second half.

The Oregon game was tied 13-13 at the break....then Oregon broke it open in the third quarter, eventually winning by a score of 48-13. The same thing happened in the Alabama game a month or so later. Alabama took a 13-10 lead into the half but ended up winning 41-10.

Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12261 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 6:48 pm to
UT-3
Oregon-0

Book It
Posted by Bassmanbruno
Member since Dec 2008
1440 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 7:28 pm to
Oregon has a little babies for dlinemen.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42610 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Those weights are all off. Buckner at 230.


Well if he's 6'7 230 then he definitely needs to add some to play on any line as he'd be a stick at that height so that seems a typo. What about the others? So far I haven't seen anything we can't handle in terms of DL even from newer articles that indicates a large DL by our standards.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter