Started By
Message
re: SEC's top 5 football coaches
Posted on 2/27/13 at 8:55 am to sorantable
Posted on 2/27/13 at 8:55 am to sorantable
I'd put a guy up there that won the Big errrr 3 straight years with no talent
Posted on 2/27/13 at 8:55 am to RollTide1987
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/29/13 at 9:47 am
Posted on 2/27/13 at 8:58 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Just clarifying for a slightly misleading thread title
In all honesty no JFF and Sumlin wouldnt even be in this debate(yet). He is a damn fine coach, my second favorite actually but that was the best possible 1st season he could have had. He runs that uptempo stuff that the SEC wasnt used to. If he can do it again after we know what he is going to do then he will be undisputed. Same goes for Freeze imo. That Oregon type O is going to be exposed this year in the SEC im affraid.
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:00 am to DevellionDore
So Franklin is after two years? GTFO
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:01 am to joeyb147
Yeah...that fight was bad and Holtz resigned shortly there after. But that still doesn't defeat my point. Holtz got the ball rolling at South Carolina. I don't know why people refuse to give him credit where credit is due because, prior to 2011, their 9-3 season in 2001 was the best one South Carolina had had in what seems like forever.
Things started to slip the last couple of years as Holtz started losing his touch but there is no denying what he did to South Carolina's program. He gave them the shot in the arm they needed and made it possible for someone like Spurrier to come in and have success.
Things started to slip the last couple of years as Holtz started losing his touch but there is no denying what he did to South Carolina's program. He gave them the shot in the arm they needed and made it possible for someone like Spurrier to come in and have success.
This post was edited on 2/27/13 at 9:03 am
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:02 am to DMagic
Yea only because he is at VANDERBILT. Also that he WON 9 i repeat 9 games at VANDERBILT.
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:05 am to DevellionDore
1. Kevin Sumlin
2. Nick Saban
3. Les Miles
4. Spurrier
5. The rest
2. Nick Saban
3. Les Miles
4. Spurrier
5. The rest
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:06 am to DevellionDore
quote:
In all honesty no JFF and Sumlin wouldnt even be in this debate(yet). He is a damn fine coach, my second favorite actually but that was the best possible 1st season he could have had. He runs that uptempo stuff that the SEC wasnt used to. If he can do it again after we know what he is going to do then he will be undisputed. Same goes for Freeze imo. That Oregon type O is going to be exposed this year in the SEC im affraid.
A&M doesn't run an Oregon type offense.
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:07 am to TeLeFaWx
Double post :(
This post was edited on 2/27/13 at 9:08 am
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:07 am to TeLeFaWx
......sumlin is no where near saban he is has set himself apart from everyone ..... I wouldn't even say sumlin is passed miles or even spurrier....
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:07 am to DevellionDore
And Sumlin won 10 at A&M. Your point?
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:08 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
SEC's top 5 football coaches
quote:
In all honesty no JFF and Sumlin wouldnt even be in this debate(yet). He is a damn fine coach, my second favorite actually but that was the best possible 1st season he could have had. He runs that uptempo stuff that the SEC wasnt used to. If he can do it again after we know what he is going to do then he will be undisputed. Same goes for Freeze imo. That Oregon type O is going to be exposed this year in the SEC im affraid.
A&M doesn't run an Oregon type offense.
I call all that fast paced stuff Oregon type. They are the ones who made it trend after all.
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:11 am to DMagic
quote:
And Sumlin won 10 at A&M. Your point?
In defense of Franklin, the last time Vanderbilt won 9 games before 2012 was 1915. Texas A&M has had 9+ win seasons more recently.
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:15 am to RollTide1987
I'm not claiming Franklin shouldn't be considered. However if you preclude Sumlin because he's a first year coach it's just silly homerism. But it's not surprising considering the OP.
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:20 am to DMagic
quote:
I'm not claiming Franklin shouldn't be considered. However if you preclude Sumlin because he's a first year coach it's just silly homerism. But it's not surprising considering the OP.
WTF are you talking about? 1 good Year at aTm does not outweigh 2 good years at Vandy. Are you serious?
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:21 am to DevellionDore
God dammit you're dense
Posted on 2/27/13 at 9:24 am to sugatowng
quote:
I'd put a guy up there that won the Big errrr 3 straight years with no talent
I wouldn't.
Popular
Back to top


1




