Started By
Message
SEC teams that cannot be removed.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:10 pm
Vanderbilt. Having a private school in a conference shields intra-conference correspondence from FOIA requests.
In the ACC you have 4 (Wake Forest, Boston College, Miami and Duke).
In the Big Ten you have 1 (Northwestern)
In the PAC 12 you have 2 (USC, Stanford)
In the Big 12 you have 2 (Baylor, TCU)
In the ACC you have 4 (Wake Forest, Boston College, Miami and Duke).
In the Big Ten you have 1 (Northwestern)
In the PAC 12 you have 2 (USC, Stanford)
In the Big 12 you have 2 (Baylor, TCU)
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 8:18 pm
9
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:10 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Arkansas. We know everyone loves us.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:13 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Purdue isn't private.
Not that it takes away from your point though, it's a cool concept and makes a lot of sense.
Not that it takes away from your point though, it's a cool concept and makes a lot of sense.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:15 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Kentucky misses the cut again
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:17 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
n the Big Ten you have 2 (Purdue and Northwestern)
Purdue is public
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:18 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Arkansas. We know everyone loves us
Ehhh this is questionable
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:19 pm to KSGamecock
That's why Rice, SMU, and TCU were pissed when Baylor made the original Big 12 cut but Houston wasn't.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:21 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Are you sure that FOIA applies to states and state institutions? I'm not sure that's right...
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:24 pm to KSGamecock
Yes, caused an uproar when UKAA when from 501 3 c to actually being part of the university. BCG, the gift that kept on giving, sorta like the Clap.
Anyway, now UKAA is 100% UK the first think they did was go public with the donor list.
Anyway, now UKAA is 100% UK the first think they did was go public with the donor list.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:27 pm to Cheese Grits
Well a quick google says no - FOIA only applies to the actual Federal level of the USG. States will have their own information availability laws and some aspects of what universities do may fall under FOIA requests of the Dept of Education but I'm not sure that federal FOIA applies in the sense that we're thinking. State versions maybe. But hey, I'm not a lawyer.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:45 pm to KSGamecock
Don't do a quick google search for a legal issue. Every state has their own FOIA. Here's Alabama
LINK
LINK
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:47 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
That isn’t right at all dude. Where did you come up with this nonsense
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:48 pm to Zeroforwinger
I thought we were talking federal FOIA which is what just about everyone thinks of when you say FOIA because you know, the federal FOIA is actually called FOIA and the state ones generally aren't...and they'll vary in composition by state.
How would adding a private school protect a conference from a state level FOIA equivalent request to the point that it's a wise financial decision? The juice doesn't seem like it's worth the squeeze considering that most important information in situations we're thinking of could simply be subpoenaed, even from a private school/org.
How would adding a private school protect a conference from a state level FOIA equivalent request to the point that it's a wise financial decision? The juice doesn't seem like it's worth the squeeze considering that most important information in situations we're thinking of could simply be subpoenaed, even from a private school/org.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:53 pm to KSGamecock
I think most people look at FOIA laws from an individual state. That's where the majority of law and reporting is practiced
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:55 pm to Zeroforwinger
Ok, well we'll just disagree then.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 8:58 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
If we're being honest, no founding member can be removed. We are still the SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE and loyalty to our brethren and sistern in arms (it's us against the world not just in football but in terms of just a southea firn mindset).
It would also do irreparable harm to remove a founder -- more than any other sport CFB relies on region, pride of place, and a sense that our teams are a large part of our identity but it holds for our conference in general. (I could go on with that point but y'all get it).
If we were ever forced to shrink it should be expansion I & II teams being debated. Not because they don't belong but because it's hard to erase 100 plus years.
It would also do irreparable harm to remove a founder -- more than any other sport CFB relies on region, pride of place, and a sense that our teams are a large part of our identity but it holds for our conference in general. (I could go on with that point but y'all get it).
If we were ever forced to shrink it should be expansion I & II teams being debated. Not because they don't belong but because it's hard to erase 100 plus years.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 9:00 pm to Prof
This is the correct response.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 9:04 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 12/14/17 at 9:11 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I thought the list included
Alabama, Auburn, LSU, MSU, Ole Miss, Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Kentucky, and South Carolina?
Alabama, Auburn, LSU, MSU, Ole Miss, Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Kentucky, and South Carolina?
Posted on 12/14/17 at 9:47 pm to Prof
quote:
no founding member can be removed.
Which conference bylaw says that?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News