Started By
Message
SEC hierarchy.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:52 pm
Non biased, right now the hierarchy is: Bama, and Georgia in the first tier. Auburn, LSU, Florida, A&M and Tennessee in the second tier. Then the rest are in the third tier. That might end up being the pecking order this season.
8
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:56 pm to OKTGR580
What are we basing this on? Current year? "Recent" success? Overall history?
Either way, wrong.
Either way, wrong.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:57 pm to OKTGR580
tier one:
a&m
the other tiers:
who gives a frick
a&m
the other tiers:
who gives a frick
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:58 pm to CNB
Why should SC be in the second tier?
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:59 pm to OKTGR580
Vols are the bottom of the barrel where they belong.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:01 pm to OKTGR580
3/10
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:01 pm to OKTGR580
quote:
Auburn, LSU, Florida, A&M and Tennessee in the second tier
3 of these teams have won 10+ games in a season since expansion, 2 have won their division, and 1 has won the conference.
then theres tennessee
This post was edited on 6/24/18 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:02 pm to Errerrerrwere
I didn't say they should be
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:04 pm to CNB
Then we agree. 
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:05 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
tier one: a&m
Cocaine is a hell of a drug
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:06 pm to OKTGR580
If this is football only, your rankings appear to be correct.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:07 pm to OKTGR580
Georgia had one good season. The only program in tier one right now is Bama. LSU and Florida are the only ones that were there with them in the recent past.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:08 pm to Sid E Walker
Again, based on what?
Current? Tennessee in "2nd tier" is laughable. Florida too until they prove it, but I can understand it at least.
Overall? Georgia in 1st is equally laughable.
"Recent"? Again with the whole Tennessee thing
Current? Tennessee in "2nd tier" is laughable. Florida too until they prove it, but I can understand it at least.
Overall? Georgia in 1st is equally laughable.
"Recent"? Again with the whole Tennessee thing
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:12 pm to CNB
Based on how recent each program has won their division or has won 10 games or has won the SEC.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:13 pm to CNB
Although Tennessee has sucked for years, their body of work puts them in tier one.
If Bama didn’t get Saban, we’d probably having the same discussion with Tennessee’s and Bama’s positions flipped. And I say that with hating Tennessee in every bone in my body.
If Bama didn’t get Saban, we’d probably having the same discussion with Tennessee’s and Bama’s positions flipped. And I say that with hating Tennessee in every bone in my body.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:14 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
Although Tennessee has sucked for years, their body of work puts them in tier one.
Yes, if overall. I agree. But they're in tier 2. Which brings loads of questions that OP just answered bringing a ton more questions
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:14 pm to CNB
quote:
Again, based on what?
Agreed. Not trying to kick the Vols while they are down but its been quite some time since the Vols have done anything of note. You could make a solid argument they aren't in the top half of the East going into this season, much less the entire conference.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:26 pm to CNB
They haven’t sucked for years they just won 10 games year before last. They sucked last year, yes. The years before that, Butch was trying to bring them back and couldn’t get it completely done. Everyone shits on Butch but IMO, he was trying to bring them back from the dead and got them halfway there.
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:27 pm to OKTGR580
quote:
they just won 10 games year before last
?
What year was this again?
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:29 pm to OKTGR580
I think you are confused.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News