re: SEC expansion gave us Ark, SC, A&M and Missouri.

Care to explain HOW teams can play 7 or 8 of "the big 6"?
At most , it would be 5 (for the B6) or 6 (everybody else).

I redid the site's chart with current divisions/B6 & listed the results below.

1 - WHY is SC in the "SEC East"?
2 - WHY is Tn. in the "SEC South"?
3 - Move Ark. to "SEC West", LSU to "SEC South", & TN to "SEC East", & SC to "SEC North". This puts the Big 6 playing each other more often - which many seem to want.

quote:

---

Ole Miss, one of the most interesting schools in the conference

---

If you want people to take you seriously, you have to stop saying shite like this.

What a huge mistake. Not a quality team in the bunch.

Your revised schedules punish the big six schools by giving them harder paths to the championship than the little 8. In a two year span they have 2 more games against big six competition than the little guys. Find a way to balance this, perhaps using a three year cycle.

quote:

---

Being a kid of the 80's isn't a "Boomer"

---

When Milennial says to me (gen x) “okay boomer” my response usually one of the following:

1. How is your lack of a job going?
2. Is 30 or 35 when you plan to move out of mama’s house?
3. What is today’s coping strategy for totally failing at afulthood?

QUIT picking on the hogs and game hens!

They've been here a while now and have played in some memorable games and seasons.

They have earned their place into SEC lore.

MIZZOU and TEX A&M have got some work to do. Especially, the one with a collie mascot called Reveille.

I’m in. Roommate switch looks awesome overall. Checks every box.

My plan, according to their format, was split the B6 into the groups of 3...& the rest in groups of 4. I then broke it down via geography.

If you look at their setup on the page, LSU would be the ONLY B6 school to play the other B6 LESS than they play each other. In that scenario, you're giving them a pass.

To your suggestions:

1 - I don't know any format that everybody plays the same strength except the current where you would have 3-5 each year depending on who you are (6 div., 1 perm. c-d, & 1 rot. c-d).

2- WHAT format (esp. with 14 teams) can you do a 3 year cycle other than my idea of 16 teams? Then again, that depends on how the pods are made (where you can have 0-4 B6 schools in them).
CG contestants
Y1 - Pods AB winner vrs. Pods CD winner
Y2 - Pods AC winner vrs. Pods BD winner
Y3 - Pods AD winner vrs. Pods BC winner

I could redo it to see what comes up...but that would be depending on how you break down the 2 groups of 3 & 2 groups of 4. Keep in mind: like divisions/pods, these 4 groups hold the teams you WILL PLAY EACH YEAR. So, if you're keeping rivalries, you need to remember that.

As I said in the other post, I made the B6 the groups of 3 & geography decide the rest.