Started By
Message
Sagarin Ratings : Top CFP teams of the BCS/Playoff Era
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:17 am
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:17 am
Thoughts?
@BradPowers7 : Sagarin Ratings BCS/Playoff Era
1. 2005 Texas 106.9
2. 2001 Miami, FL 106.4
3. 2019 LSU 104.9
4. 2019 Ohio State 104.8
5. 2016 Clemson 105.4
6. 2016 Alabama 105.3
7. 2011 Alabama 104.2
8. 2004 USC 103.4
9. 2018 Clemson 103.2
10. 1999 Florida St 102.1
11. 2013 Florida St 101.9
12. 2000 Oklahoma 101.6
13. 2000 Miami 101.5
14. 2019 Clemson 101.5
15. 2018 Alabama 101.4
16. 2017 Alabama 101.2
17. 2015 Alabama 100.9
18. 2014 Ohio State 100.8
19. 2009 Alabama 100.3
20. 2000 Florida St 100.3
@BradPowers7 : Sagarin Ratings BCS/Playoff Era
1. 2005 Texas 106.9
2. 2001 Miami, FL 106.4
3. 2019 LSU 104.9
4. 2019 Ohio State 104.8
5. 2016 Clemson 105.4
6. 2016 Alabama 105.3
7. 2011 Alabama 104.2
8. 2004 USC 103.4
9. 2018 Clemson 103.2
10. 1999 Florida St 102.1
11. 2013 Florida St 101.9
12. 2000 Oklahoma 101.6
13. 2000 Miami 101.5
14. 2019 Clemson 101.5
15. 2018 Alabama 101.4
16. 2017 Alabama 101.2
17. 2015 Alabama 100.9
18. 2014 Ohio State 100.8
19. 2009 Alabama 100.3
20. 2000 Florida St 100.3
This post was edited on 1/15/20 at 10:24 am
34
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:18 am to SummerOfGeorge
pretty accurate... the top 3 could all be rotated any way shape or form and it could be argued
eta just saw number 4. WTF??
eta just saw number 4. WTF??
This post was edited on 1/15/20 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:18 am to SummerOfGeorge
2012 Alabama > 2011 Alabama.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:19 am to SummerOfGeorge
No 2019 Arkansas?
No 2007 Ole Miss?
List is shite.
No 2007 Ole Miss?
List is shite.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:22 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
3. 2019 LSU 104.9
4. 2019 Ohio State 104.8
the difference isnt that close.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:23 am to SummerOfGeorge
Damn that 2001 Miami team was good....
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:24 am to diddlydawg7
quote:
2007 Ole Miss
GOAT team
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:24 am to SummerOfGeorge
Sagarin sucks and I'd bet money those scores aren't done using the same formula for each if they are historical.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:26 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
4. 2019 Ohio State 104.8
Don’t understand the obsession with them. They couldn’t even beat Clemson
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:27 am to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:28 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
4. 2019 Ohio State 104.8
quote:
14. 2019 Clemson 101.5
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:31 am to SummerOfGeorge
Computer rankings based on College Stats. Like I said many times before, College stats are garbage.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:33 am to SummerOfGeorge
No Florida? List is as bad as ESPN's top player list
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:35 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
3. 2019 LSU 104.9
4. 2019 Ohio State 104.8
5. 2016 Clemson 105.4
6. 2016 Alabama 105.3
Why are the ratings higher for #5 and #6?
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:37 am to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
Why are the ratings higher for #5 and #6?
Not sure - just copied the tweet. I'm guessing he meant to write 104.4 and 104.3.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:37 am to SummerOfGeorge
This list is trash.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:37 am to mizslu314
quote:
3. 2019 LSU 104.9
4. 2019 Ohio State 104.8
quote:
the difference isnt that close.
We should have been able to find out on the field.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:38 am to SummerOfGeorge
I mean, it’s hard to argue with since these were all top-tier teams, and we don’t really know which metrics were used or how they were applied ... but it also seems like a strong, reliable algorithm shouldn’t produce a #4 team that couldn’t even advance past the first round of playoffs.
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:39 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Not sure - just copied the tweet. I'm guessing he meant to write 104.4 and 104.3.
Ahh, okay, in the replies he said he copy/pasted wrong:
quote:
No I copied LSU and Ohio St in wrong ahead of them.
LINK
Posted on 1/15/20 at 10:39 am to DeepBlueSea
quote:
I mean, it’s hard to argue with since these were all top-tier teams, and we don’t really know which metrics were used or how they were applied ... but it also seems like a strong, reliable algorithm shouldn’t produce a #4 team that couldn’t even advance past the first round of playoffs.
Agree
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News