Started By
Message
re: Ryan Day still whining over "non-targeting" aka “Displaced Buckeye Sore Butthole thread”
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:06 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:06 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Y'all were three pages in before I showed up. And for every one of my posts, there are about 5-6 from insecure Georgia fans. You can't even enjoy another title, because you know.
Damn this an awesome melt!!!
1
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:07 pm to DrewDawg13
God the salty tears are delicious....
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:13 pm to SpurandBlue
quote:
God the salty tears are delicious....
Joined January 2023... lol
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:31 pm to halfadolla50
quote:
Joined January 2023... lol
You have been around 8yrs with 211 posts - 26 per year.
So bye - we will see you January 2024.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:38 pm to halfadolla50
Melt melt melt, Ohio full of broken bitches.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:41 pm to SpurandBlue
It’s simple. It was a legal hit to separate the WR from the ball. It was a hard hit but clean. The OB play bucks are crying about was corrected as it should have been. The ball carrier wasn’t out of bounds and reached for the line to gain. Georgia won. Stop crying.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 1:45 pm to CasualFan12
Whats funny is the receiver.
1) he stepped out of bounds
2) he alligator armed the catch. The defender didn't jar the ball lose. It was dropped before contact.
I hate that he got hurt. Because of that, we have to listen to years of excuses from buckeyes.
But the play was a fail about 5 ways over for the buckeyes (lastly because it wasn't targeting despite the crying).
1) he stepped out of bounds
2) he alligator armed the catch. The defender didn't jar the ball lose. It was dropped before contact.
I hate that he got hurt. Because of that, we have to listen to years of excuses from buckeyes.
But the play was a fail about 5 ways over for the buckeyes (lastly because it wasn't targeting despite the crying).
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:00 pm to Hobnailboot
quote:
How could you watch
Pretty easy. I saw what the official on the field and countless others saw.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:01 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Check
JFC.
Read what I responded to and see if you can figure it out.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:We've got a problem here. On the one hand, we have a ruling from the officials that the hit was not targeting, so in at least one sense (and the only one that matters in the end), it wasn't targeting. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. It went down in history as NOT targeting.quote:That's one opinion. Others disagree.
And no, that wasn’t targeting.
On the other hand, we have the perception of targeting by some (mostly those who wanted it to be targeting, it seems) who think that the hit met the requirements. Perception certainly can vary, but ultimately that doesn't matter.
Since others have gone through the trouble to show that the hit didn't qualify as targeting from a rules perspective, I won't bother, especially since you won't be persuaded by anything. I'll just say that it was not targeting because the replay booth said it wasn't targeting, and that's how the play went down in the books.
Arguing about it now is pointless.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:03 pm to tgdawg68
quote:
You're engaging in semantics.
"Semantics" is something people say when they're on the losing end of an argument and have run out of points.
I'm correct. You could've just said that and saved some time.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:04 pm to tgdawg68
quote:
your statement is still true
Dj, get these people under control. You've at least shown that you somewhat understand the rule.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:06 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
God man, slap a tampon in it move on. Between Cincinnati and OSU, whining never stops. Melt.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:06 pm to Long Dawg
quote:
The reason it’s 14 pages long is due to Displaced Buckeye - otherwise it was a 5 page thread max
You started the thread and 10 or so insecure Georgia fans have kept it going...
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:07 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Why are you still here, this is an sec board. Whiney arse beotch.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:07 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Perception certainly can vary
Indeed.
quote:
Since others have gone through the trouble to show that the hit didn't qualify as targeting from a rules perspective
That hasn't happened, because there's been a refusal to accept the subjectiveness of the call.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:08 pm to SpurandBlue
quote:
SpurandBlue
frick off, alter.
This is the one and only reply you're getting from me.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:09 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:09 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Displaced, how many more years will the sucknut faithful bitch and moan about this call??
Why do the sucknut faithful have so much trouble comprehending and understanding the rules of the game?
Why do the sucknut faithful have so much trouble comprehending and understanding the rules of the game?
Posted on 2/2/23 at 3:11 pm to bunkerhill
quote:
Displaced, how many more years will the sucknut faithful bitch and moan about this call??
I can only speak for myself. The number of threads I start about this will be exactly what it is now...Zero.
I'll move on as soon as insecure Georgia fans do. But if they want to keep running their mouths, I'm OK with that too.
Page 15 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News