Started By
Message

RaRa Thomas and Dom Lovett were huge pickups for UGA.

Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:05 am
Posted by jryanw
Bham, AL
Member since Dec 2013
4611 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:05 am
I know it’s crazy to say a team that’s currently ranked number 1 is getting more dangerous but man that’s a dangerous team next season.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 10:06 am
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86429 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:06 am to
We'll go as our QB play goes. WR should be a tremendous upgrade and TE/RB/OL should be their usual selves. Defense will always be good under Kirby.

How good is carson beck? He's only ever played in mopup duty so we don't really know. If he falters we'll have brock/gunner both of which have barely any experience on a college field at all.

The good news is the schedule is incredibly weak to start so beck can ease in which is nice.
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27479 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:12 am to
quote:

How good is carson beck? He's only ever played in mopup duty so we don't really know. If he falters we'll have brock/gunner both of which have barely any experience on a college field at all.


It’s not a given he starts next year. I know a guy who works for the team and he says that all 3 are about equal but Beck gets the nod due to seniority
Posted by jryanw
Bham, AL
Member since Dec 2013
4611 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:15 am to
quote:

How good is carson beck? He's only ever played in mopup duty so we don't really know. If he falters we'll have brock/gunner both of which have barely any experience on a college field at all.


If he’s not good enough y’all will add a transfer in the spring.
Posted by Cheer
Member since Sep 2021
5254 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Beck gets the nod due to seniority


Beck looked better than anyone in the spring game. This, coming from a guy who was sour on Beck after he was smiling after an interception last season.
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27479 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Beck looked better than anyone in the spring game


First of all, the spring game was 8 months ago.

Secondly, my source sees them play for hours every day. You saw one scrimmage from ages ago.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86429 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:22 am to
quote:

First of all, the spring game was 8 months ago.


he has looked pretty great in games as well, or at least as good as one could look in such situations.

And brock and gunner havne't done shite.

quote:

Secondly, my source sees them play for hours every day. You saw one scrimmage from ages ago.



then at the same time you also still say that beck is in the lead and likely starts. Whether it's based on seniority or not, we're all saying that beck is the starter.

Personally I think brock leaves and evetnaully (next year probably) gunner is the guy and better than beck, but to start 2023 I don't see how beck isn't the guy.

What have you ever seen from kirby that would lead you to believe that a young guy with zero playing experience will be the opening day starter over an upperclassman with solid game experience?
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27479 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:29 am to
quote:

then at the same time you also still say that beck is in the lead and likely starts


No I didn’t. I said he gets the nod as the #2 guy right now due to seniority.

quote:

What have you ever seen from kirby that would lead you to believe that a young guy with zero playing experience will be the opening day starter over an upperclassman with solid game experience?


He already did this in 2020. Granted it was a poor decision.

All I’m saying is that right now in practice all 3 seem to be equal. Beck is #2 because if Stetson were to go down he has the most experience.

I think it’s very possible Gunner or Brock overtake him in the spring. 50 career passes in garbage time isn’t enough to give Beck the nod over someone playing better.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86429 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:35 am to
quote:

No I didn’t. I said he gets the nod as the #2 guy right now due to seniority.


the hell are you talking about #2? You said:

quote:

all 3 are about equal but Beck gets the nod due to seniority


You literally said beck would get the nod [to start 2023, which is the entire point of the topic we're in] due to seniority. As in, will start.


quote:

He already did this in 2020. Granted it was a poor decision.


Jamie Newman was a seasoned vet that was supposed to start then he quit. JT Daniels was a portal transfer with experience that was tyhen supposed to start but was hurt. Our only other options were a highly touted and "higher ceiling" guy and a career backup walkon with 20 career completions all in mopup duty. Hindsight is 20/20 but going with mathis wasn't a terrible take at the time.

In 2016 it was obvious eason would be better but we started Lambert. In 2018 we could argue all day about fields but fromm was the starter. In 2021 daniels started over bennett.

For kirby to start anyone OTHER than beck in 2023 it would be completely out of character.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
29968 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:38 am to
Then the have 5 stars waiting behind 5 stars on o and d lines.

Kirby has the culture at this time.
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27479 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:43 am to
Why is this hard for you to understand? I said I know someone who currently works for the football team who says they’re all equal right now but Beck gets (as in present tense) the nod at backup because he has seniority.

I never made any prediction on who starts next year. I’d probably give them all equal chances from what I’ve heard.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86429 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:47 am to
I understand, but you didn't word things properly and now you're trying to backtrack on it. Every post above yours was about next year. And to go a step further, in YOUR post the first sentence was regarding next year:

quote:

It’s not a given he starts next year. I know a guy who works for the team and he says that all 3 are about equal but Beck gets the nod due to seniority


Any logical thinking human reading what is quoted above would deduce that you are saying that next year Beck, while relatively equal with the others, will get the nod IYO based on experience.

Now you're trying to backpedal and act like you only meant right now if bennett goes down.
Posted by Dawg4Life47
Beach
Member since Sep 2013
8423 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 10:54 am to
This is why Beck will start
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27479 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:01 am to
What would I have to gain by backtracking that statement?

I can see how you misinterpreted what I said, but saying “it’s not a given” does not imply I think he starts. It just means everyone else thinks he does.

I haven’t even mentioned how silly it is that you’re comparing next year’s situation to previous years.

Greyson Lambert had 600 actual career pass attempts going into 2016

Jake Fromm had 300 career passing attempts and had led his team to a national title going into 2018

Comparing either to someone with no game experience outside of garbage time is dumb.

And on the other side, comparing Fields and Eason, both true freshmen in their respective situations, to 2nd and 3rd year guys is insane.

The situations aren’t even close to comparable.

quote:

Now you're trying to backpedal and act like you only meant right now if bennett goes down.


So if I really did mean next season instead of right now, why would I randomly backpedal. You think I previously meant something else and just randomly changed my mind? Wut?
Posted by StevieG504
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
3473 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:04 am to
Exactly. You will only go as far as your QB will take you. I don’t think GA fans understand the magnitude of losing Stetson Bennett. It’s not easy staying on top of the hill while changing QBs.
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27479 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:05 am to
quote:

I don’t think GA fans understand the magnitude of losing Stetson Bennett.


What a shocking change of narrative
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86429 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:12 am to
idk man I'm bored at work sorry.

quote:

comparing Fields and Eason, both true freshmen in their respective situations, to 2nd and 3rd year guys is insane.


I don't really see why, considering fields/eason/gunner/brock all have no real college experience. And therefore are further down on the depth chart compared to fromm/lambert/beck when it comes to beginning season.
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
6889 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:19 am to
Georgia is going to win 3 National Championships in a row. Their schedule doesn't present much of a challenge with Auburn and Florida being down. Tennessee is improving but they don't have the talent yet to seriously compete for the east.
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27479 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:20 am to
The garbage time experience does very little to help compared to years in practice.

There’s not much difference between Beck and the rest right now. Even in terms of experience.

Posted by Shamoan
Member since Feb 2019
9144 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 11:24 am to
if Rara is in a return role only, then yes they are more dangerous. if he is in a WR role and return role, they got LESS dangerous.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter