Started By
Message

Random thought: JR Smith and Malik Monk

Posted on 3/25/17 at 10:47 pm
Posted by South Alabama Tide
Member since Feb 2015
3156 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 10:47 pm
Both have similar styles and look similar as well.
Posted by justausedcarguy
Member since Aug 2014
5642 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 10:51 pm to
Careful, some might call you racist...
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:10 pm to
JR and Malik are not even remotely similar. Malik shoots an extremely low percentage from three. His explosiveness will get him drafted high, and the occasional bomb will contribute to his draft status

JR shoots 40+% from three. Malik is not capable of that from the college line.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 11:16 pm
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:18 pm to
jr is a better shooter

malik is more athletic

i really think the best comparison to malik is shannon brown undersized 2 with crazy athletic ability
Posted by Sneakerhead42
North Pole, Alaska
Member since Dec 2014
2164 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

JR and Malik are not even remotely similar. Malik shoots an extremely low percentage from three. His explosiveness will get him drafted high, and the occasional bomb will contribute to his draft status

JR shoots 40+% from three. Malik is not capable of that from the college line.


Why has your account not been suspended yet?? Most annoying troll on the damn site
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:25 pm to
For saying that JR Smith is a much more proficient three point shooter than Malik Monk? That's just a fact. Malik is explosive, but he's not JR Smith as far as shooting.
Posted by JGuidry7
Boston University
Member since Jan 2013
932 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

JR shoots 40+% from three. Malik is not capable of that from the college line.
JR Smith's career 3PT% is like 37.
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:27 pm to
i mean hes not wrong. also jr smith is 6'6 with a 6'10 wingspan and monk is 6'3 with a 6'3 with span
Posted by TigerNSac
Sacramento
Member since Oct 2008
592 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:30 pm to
You are so "Typical" without even pretending to be sincere, lol.
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:45 pm to
Malik has a very good chance to be a star, but his chance is not as a shooter.
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:58 pm to
Malik Monk is less than 40% from the college line

Superstars who are struggling shoot better than that
This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 12:01 am
Posted by DayBowBow
Member since Jun 2011
5028 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 8:10 am to
He's 39.45% from 3 you dumbass.
Posted by TiggerWoods
Auburn
Member since Nov 2010
3974 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:26 am to
Someone is upset at Malik for not choosing the hogs.
Posted by bigman334
Member since Jul 2013
2417 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:33 am to
both streaky shooters. but it ends there.
Posted by SECFan1995
Member since Sep 2015
7880 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:35 am to
Holy dumb troll. So a mere -.55 from 40 percent from the three point line suddenly is a "low percentage shooter". Holy frick is this dumb, and keep in mind, this has been with Monk slumping. He was above a magical line of 40 apparently most of the year.
Posted by Robert Goulet
Member since Jan 2013
9999 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Malik has a very good chance to be a star, but his chance is not as a shooter.



Lol is this guy serious?
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

He's 39.45% from 3 you dumbass.


Which is less than 40% as I stated, dumbass.
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:46 am to
I've been very complimentary of him in this thread. I said he isn't the caliber of shooter that JR Smith is, which is true.
Posted by SECFan1995
Member since Sep 2015
7880 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:47 am to
You're not being serious.
Posted by SECFan1995
Member since Sep 2015
7880 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:50 am to
When I think of low percentage shooter, I think below 35%.

But this guy's "magical" line is 40%.

Good god.

Btw: NBA draft evaluators don't look at your three point percentage in college to determine if whether you're going to be a good shooter, they look at your free throw percentage.

So most of this thread has gotten debunked.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter