Started By
Message
Ole' Miss player did not maintain control..
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:26 am
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:26 am
No catch.
DWI..
DWI..
6
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:27 am to GooseSix
Neat
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:28 am to GooseSix
A Bama fan taking up for refs? Shocked
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:28 am to CNB
quote:
Neat
I know.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:28 am to GooseSix
Why is different for running back than a receiver? All a running back has to do is break the plane of the goal for 1/2 second and it’s a touchdown.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:32 am to gumbeaux
It's not a question of whether he was in the endzone. It's a question of whether he caught the ball. After watching it several times there was never a point where you could say he had secured the catch. If he had just tucked the ball we wouldn't be having this conversation
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:34 am to Grim
He tucked it.
His butt hit he ground.
Back hit the ground.
Arm outstretched
DB grabbed bal while he was laying in endzone
It was a catch
His butt hit he ground.
Back hit the ground.
Arm outstretched
DB grabbed bal while he was laying in endzone
It was a catch
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:35 am to Grim
quote:
It's not a question of whether he was in the endzone. It's a question of whether he caught the ball. After watching it several times there was never a point where you could say he had secured the catch. If he had just tucked the ball we wouldn't be having this conversation
This. It's pretty simple.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:35 am to gumbeaux
It’s different because the rule is literally different for those two circumstances
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:37 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
He tucked it.
No
quote:
His butt hit he ground.
Back hit the ground.
Irrelevant
quote:
DB grabbed bal while he was laying in endzone
It was a catch
The ball was moving around in his hand the entire time and then the defender pulled it completely loose
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:40 am to GooseSix
He was robbed, bad rule, worse review decision.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:40 am to Grim
quote:
If he had just tucked the ball
Just saying this makes it obvious that you haven’t watched the play.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:41 am to GooseSix
looked more like an interception to me.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:42 am to Grim
Agree it wasn’t a catch imho..he dropped 3 balls in last 5 min of game btw and looking Treadwellish to me unfortunately
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:42 am to yatesdog38
defenders feet were out if bounds, no way it could have been an int, but with poor officiating, who knows?
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:45 am to DownSouthJukin
quote:
Just saying this makes it obvious that you haven’t watched the play.
I've seen it several times. He began to pull the ball down like he was going to tuck it but then outstretched his arm for some reason (likely because he was still trying to get control of it)
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:45 am to GooseSix
I hate ole miss, but it was a catch. He secured the ball, got his feet on the ground, had his knee on the ground, had his butt on the ground, and fell on his back. Between his arse hitting ground and falling on his back it started to bobble, but it should have been a completion on all the previous steps. I guess you have to make it to the locker room to rule a completion.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:47 am to UFMatt
quote:
He was robbed, bad rule, worse review decision.
You can argue that it is a bad rule, but the rule was followed. In no way was it a bad review decision.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:47 am to shamrock
quote:
Agree it wasn’t a catch imho..he dropped 3 balls in last 5 min of game btw and looking Treadwellish to me unfortunately
This would be my position on things. That last TD, catch or not, is inconsequential. He dropped the winning TD in regulation....right in his hands.
Posted on 11/18/18 at 11:49 am to PickupAutist
quote:
Between his arse hitting ground and falling on his back it started to bobble
No catch. The review indicates as much.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News