Started By
Message

re: Now that’s its over and Georgia won

Posted on 1/18/22 at 11:45 am to
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22383 posts
Posted on 1/18/22 at 11:45 am to
quote:

It cracks me up that you think a still photo is some sort of proof that his arm isnt moving. Lol




His arm moved forward.

The ball didn't move with it, as the image shows.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22383 posts
Posted on 1/18/22 at 11:46 am to
quote:

It was a pass. A ball doesn't travel 10 yards in the direction of the throwing motion unless it was thrown. Also, Bryce's pass should've in been intentional grounding.




Well it didn't travel 10 yards in the direction of the throwing motion.

It went about 5 yards forward, and 19 yards out of bounds in the opposite direction of the incoming sack. AKA the defender knocked it that way with the hit.

Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32738 posts
Posted on 1/18/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Does the arm not have to be going forward to push it forward


It does but it doesn’t have to be possessed
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32738 posts
Posted on 1/18/22 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

The rules desperately need to be rewritten from arm "going forward" to somethign along the lines of intent to pass.


Would need the ref to be a mind reader. Just needs to be a wr in the area
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
9357 posts
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:11 pm to
My issues was the fumble they confirmed but the call of grounding if it wasnt a fumble..that’s what pissed me off in the stands.

Saying he was hit and fumbled but having any clue where he would have been passing had it not been for the hit.

Also..zero holding calls against either team on line of scrimmage. Zero.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25490 posts
Posted on 1/18/22 at 1:25 pm to
slow motion tweet

Here is a great slow motion tweet of the play.

Watch his right elbow go forward. And notice the position of the ball when that happens. That is the definition of a forward throwing motion. The ball is 100% secure at this point.

When the motion reaches the hand, that forward thrust is what dislodges the ball. The forward motion is literally the force which caused the fumble.

It didnt effect the game. It just baffles me how the shoulder and elbow drive forward and people dont see that as a forward pass attempt.
Posted by Terrific Tales
Member since Jan 2019
19425 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:55 am to
quote:

Well hopefully it wasn't your boss because you can't prove that with a physics equation. You can't equate possession of the ball.

To be clear. What I did was prove it was impossible to make the ball move that far with instantaneous contact

I didn’t get into the impulse (possession) because I was only trying to prove that it couldn’t have happened without possession. Proving that it can happen isn’t necessary because it did happen therefore it had to happen one of the 2 ways
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58901 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 7:31 am to
quote:

It does but it doesn’t have to be possessed



True.

This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 7:38 am
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
24263 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 7:33 am to
The ball was moving before his arm went forward. It was the correct call.
Posted by Zanzibaw
BR
Member since Jun 2016
2946 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

because I was only trying to prove that it couldn’t have happened without possession


Explain to me how kicking works then? you don't have to have possession for the forward momentum of your hand to knock the ball forward all of 20 ft
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter