Started By
Message
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:19 pm to Sun God
You really think that's Georgia's best team since 1980?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:22 pm to WG_Dawg
Excellent rebuttal. I'm willing to listen
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:42 pm to Sun God
quote:
You're argument was Michel took away from Chubb. You've been proven wrong again and again. And again.
The original stat posted was the TD leaders at the end of Sept 2015, which is strong evidence supporting my point. You have ignored it again, and again, but post it one more time:
LF 8
NC 7
SM 7
We all know that you cannot explain how the backup Rb getting so many scores isnt "taking away" from the 1st RB, and why.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:46 pm to djsdawg
Why are you using that timeline? Why not compare over the games each played before Chubb went down?
This was your first post in this thread. Sorry to make you look dumb. Again.
quote:
Look at this guy not understanding the statiatical impact of Sony michel’s role.
This was your first post in this thread. Sorry to make you look dumb. Again.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:47 pm to Sun God
quote:
Even though we won the championship over yalls best team since 1980
Our one sided discussion now makes all the sense in the world. What a terrible take devoid of any facts or logic.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:53 pm to Sun God
Didn’t realized we played LSU in 2007.
That wasn’t even the best Richt team.
That wasn’t even the best Richt team.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:57 pm to Sun God
quote:
This was your first post in this thread. Sorry to make you look dumb.
This is an incredibly basic concept, but you dont seem to understand that there is only one FB for an offensive player to score with on a single play. If the backup is scoring on a play, that means the starter doesnt have the ball.
quote:
Why not compare over the games each played before Chubb went down?
I gave a list of 3 solid reasons, for the sake of fairness, and you have no argument against any of them. Its hard to argue against fairness.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:00 pm to Sun God
quote:
Can you disprove that?
To a well adjusted person who understands basic concepts and has common sense, easily.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:02 pm to djsdawg
No, you made a list of arbitrary reasons to make your point. Lol @ "fairness". The numbers agree with me. Better luck next time.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:03 pm to djsdawg
quote:
To a well adjusted person who understands basic concepts and has common sense, easily.
Of which you have displayed zero.
Chubb was great. Fournette was better. That's all there is padnah
quote:
It's 1022-745 in rushing yards favoring Fournette before Chubb got injured
Fournette had 12 TDs
Fournette had more receiving yards
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:09 pm to Sun God
82, 02, 12, and 17 were better teams than 07.
81 and 05 (with a healthy Shockley) could throw their hat in the ring as well.
To say 07 is the best team we've had since 80 is just idiocy and flat out wrong.
81 and 05 (with a healthy Shockley) could throw their hat in the ring as well.
To say 07 is the best team we've had since 80 is just idiocy and flat out wrong.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:14 pm to WG_Dawg
81 and 05
12 and 17
02 and 82 maybe
12 and 17
02 and 82 maybe
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:16 pm to Sun God
Which of those teams lost at home to a 6-loss laughing stock and got their brains beat in by like 4 TDs to a 4 loss team? I'll wait.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:19 pm to WG_Dawg
Which of those teams won the natty
Also @ with a healthy Shockley
Also @ with a healthy Shockley
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:20 pm to Sun God
None, which takes that factor out of the equation. One of them played for it though. Do you even remember what you're arguing anymore?
Eta: you don't even know. fricking idiot
Eta: you don't even know. fricking idiot
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News