Started By
Message

re: Nick Chubb (before the injury) was the best SEC RB I saw the last decade.

Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:09 pm to
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Even though we won the championship over yalls best team since 1980

Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:11 pm to
2007
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:19 pm to
You really think that's Georgia's best team since 1980?
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:20 pm to
Unquestionably
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86428 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:21 pm to
Geez you're retarded
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:22 pm to
Excellent rebuttal. I'm willing to listen
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32738 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

You're argument was Michel took away from Chubb. You've been proven wrong again and again. And again.


The original stat posted was the TD leaders at the end of Sept 2015, which is strong evidence supporting my point. You have ignored it again, and again, but post it one more time:

LF 8
NC 7
SM 7

We all know that you cannot explain how the backup Rb getting so many scores isnt "taking away" from the 1st RB, and why.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:46 pm to
Why are you using that timeline? Why not compare over the games each played before Chubb went down?
quote:

Look at this guy not understanding the statiatical impact of Sony michel’s role.

This was your first post in this thread. Sorry to make you look dumb. Again.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 8:47 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32738 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Even though we won the championship over yalls best team since 1980


Our one sided discussion now makes all the sense in the world. What a terrible take devoid of any facts or logic.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:48 pm to
Can you disprove that?
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
20282 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:53 pm to
Didn’t realized we played LSU in 2007.

That wasn’t even the best Richt team.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32738 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

This was your first post in this thread. Sorry to make you look dumb.


This is an incredibly basic concept, but you dont seem to understand that there is only one FB for an offensive player to score with on a single play. If the backup is scoring on a play, that means the starter doesnt have the ball.

quote:

Why not compare over the games each played before Chubb went down?


I gave a list of 3 solid reasons, for the sake of fairness, and you have no argument against any of them. Its hard to argue against fairness.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32738 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Can you disprove that?


To a well adjusted person who understands basic concepts and has common sense, easily.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:02 pm to
No, you made a list of arbitrary reasons to make your point. Lol @ "fairness". The numbers agree with me. Better luck next time.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

To a well adjusted person who understands basic concepts and has common sense, easily.

Of which you have displayed zero.

Chubb was great. Fournette was better. That's all there is padnah
quote:

It's 1022-745 in rushing yards favoring Fournette before Chubb got injured
Fournette had 12 TDs
Fournette had more receiving yards
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:07 pm
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86428 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:09 pm to
82, 02, 12, and 17 were better teams than 07.

81 and 05 (with a healthy Shockley) could throw their hat in the ring as well.

To say 07 is the best team we've had since 80 is just idiocy and flat out wrong.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:14 pm to
81 and 05
12 and 17

02 and 82 maybe
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86428 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:16 pm to
Which of those teams lost at home to a 6-loss laughing stock and got their brains beat in by like 4 TDs to a 4 loss team? I'll wait.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:19 pm to
Which of those teams won the natty

Also @ with a healthy Shockley
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:20 pm
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86428 posts
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:20 pm to
None, which takes that factor out of the equation. One of them played for it though. Do you even remember what you're arguing anymore?

Eta: you don't even know. fricking idiot
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter