Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

LSU altered Chavis contract- after he signed it

Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:32 pm
Posted by bama1959
Huntsville, AL
Member since Nov 2008
4557 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:32 pm
Who the hell is running the athletic department down there, Huey Long?
busted
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46176 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:33 pm to
You're about a day late
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:33 pm to
Look a little deeper into the story.
Posted by tigerfan5803
Premium Member
Member since Dec 2005
4521 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:33 pm to
“The ‘alteration’ issue is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from the real issues. LSU and Mr. Chavis had a valid employment agreement from 2009 until he left the University at the end of 2014. There were multiple amendments to the employment agreement during that time, including the 2012 amendment that Mr. Chavis claims was altered. Importantly, the 2012 contract was ratified in 2013 by a Memorandum of Understanding that extended Mr. Chavis’ contract with LSU by another year, through the end of 2015.

The change that occurred to the 2012 amendment was an innocent, unintentional and immaterial change. Mr. Chavis’ buyout obligation would exist under either reading of the liquidated damages clause, and the alleged “alteration” provided absolutely no benefit to LSU. Just as Mr. Chavis was entitled to his generous salary and other benefits under that agreement, LSU is entitled to enforce the liquidated damages provision of the agreement.

The Court vindicated LSU’s position on its motion to compel and ordered Mr. Chavis to produce records that he has previously withheld. LSU looks forward to obtaining those records and moving this matter toward resolution.”
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43789 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:34 pm to
They altered another one? How dumb could they be???
Posted by AU4real35
Member since Jan 2014
16065 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:36 pm to
We've landed on the moon!
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
64961 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:48 pm to
Germans, you don't know shite, LSUsessed, etc
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:02 pm to
Posted by patchesohoulihan_007
Member since Jul 2015
2054 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:20 pm to
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
15648 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 4:48 am to
Nope. Nothing to it. Nobody's 'busted'.
Posted by CajunTiger_225
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
9201 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 4:57 am to
Phone records granted. They are fricked.
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 5:43 am to
HSV - news always arrives a day or two late in Huntsville?
Posted by jackmanusc
Columbia, SC
Member since Apr 2012
3947 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 5:46 am to
Someone should photoshop sumlin's head onto Lando
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 6:26 am to
quote:

“The ‘alteration’ issue is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from the real issues.

quote:

The change that occurred to the 2012 amendment was an innocent, unintentional and immaterial change.

Any change in a legal document without the approval of BOTH parties is a real issue.
Which LSU attorney released that statement you are quoting?
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
30949 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 6:32 am to
Yeah, never mind it was illegal.
Posted by Fratigerguy
Member since Jan 2014
4741 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 7:04 am to
Posted by elit4ce05
Member since Jun 2011
3743 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 7:28 am to
l5u fukked
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 7:37 am to
frick LSU?
Posted by TangipahoaTiger
Member since Nov 2013
1256 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 7:38 am to
“The ‘alteration’ issue is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from the real issues"


Yes, changing a person's contract without their knowledge or consent is no big deal. Happens all the time with multi-million dollar contracts.

"The change that occurred to the 2012 amendment was an innocent, unintentional and immaterial change."


Oopsie, we had a little boo-boo with the contract.






Lawyers are a funny breed.



Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 7:46 am to
quote:

They altered another one? How dumb could they be???


Be kind, he had to make it to the state line just to find someone to "hep hem wit hes tieping".

It takes a few days.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter