Started By
Message
Let's Swap South Carolina For Clemson In The SEC East
Posted on 1/18/20 at 9:55 am
Posted on 1/18/20 at 9:55 am
This move would be a winner for all parties involved. Clemson would be respected for their schedule strength. South Carolina would be in a more competitive position in the ACC than where it is now in the SEC. In addition, the SEC would be further strengthened and the SEC East would somewhat rival the SEC West for which division is the toughest.
If this move works out, then next year, let's swap out Arkansas and Missouri for Oklahoma and Oklahoma State.
If this move works out, then next year, let's swap out Arkansas and Missouri for Oklahoma and Oklahoma State.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:01 am to Paul Maul number 37
First and foremost, frick you.
And in conclusion, frick you.
And in conclusion, frick you.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:02 am to Paul Maul number 37
Nah. Let's keep USCe. We should expel Missouri and admit Clemson to the program.
Do away with divisions and have the two best teams every season meet in Atlanta for the SECCG.
Do away with divisions and have the two best teams every season meet in Atlanta for the SECCG.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:14 am to Paul Maul number 37
Absolutely not. I like the gamecocks just where they are. Clemson can frick off.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:16 am to Paul Maul number 37
Let’s just put every good team in the SEC. so we got Oklahoma and Clemson joining. Got to make room for Ohio state. Maybe Oregon to the west?
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:18 am to Huge Richard
Scrap all conferences and just make it all one giant CUSA.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 10:22 am to blueridgeTiger
Keep divisions, but swapping Clemson for Missouri would END the "Auburn east" idea.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 11:20 am to blueridgeTiger
Good god, just frick off already. Would ya?
Posted on 1/18/20 at 11:21 am to Paul Maul number 37
I almost want this to happen so the entire SEC can see how awful the Clemson fanbase actually is.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 11:45 am to blueridgeTiger
Get rid of Mizzou regardless. Kansas would be a better addition. At least they’re good at something
Posted on 1/18/20 at 11:46 am to Paul Maul number 37
Let's not. USC is SEC bro. Period.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 11:49 am to Paul Maul number 37
Please point out the Gamecock fan that slept with your fantasy girlfriend. We are sorry for your imagination loss.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 11:52 am to Paul Maul number 37
Nah.. Like having Boom and the boys in the league. I say ship out Mizzu for Clemson..
Missouri literally sevres no purpose in the SEC..
Missouri literally sevres no purpose in the SEC..
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:02 pm to Paul Maul number 37
quote:
In addition, the SEC would be further strengthened and the SEC East would somewhat rival the SEC West for which division is the toughest.
Wow. must hurt that the "stronger" division is beaten by the weaker division the last two years.
If Clemson came to the east we would be head and shoulders better than the west. As is, we are only equal.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:04 pm to Paul Maul number 37
That’s a negative. Pattern is full
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:04 pm to forestwhitackersgood
quote:
Missouri literally sevres no purpose in the SEC..
Besides raising the IQ, lowering the obesity and poverty rates...you are correct
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:11 pm to Paul Maul number 37
Have a down vote.
Missouri is the obvious answer here.
Missouri is the obvious answer here.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:13 pm to DawgsLife
"As is, we are only equal."
Hardly. You have exactly ONE team in your division capable of competing for the East title. Adding Clemson would balance the scales.
Hardly. You have exactly ONE team in your division capable of competing for the East title. Adding Clemson would balance the scales.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News