Started By
Message
Jay Barker finally asked the question I want answered...
Posted on 11/12/10 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 11/12/10 at 2:57 pm
If your Cecil Newton, and all this is being said about you and your son, and it's all lies and you didnt do anything- why are you not screaming your innocence from the rooftops?
Why hire a defense attorney to represent you instead of a litigator to go after these people?
If Cecil has done nothing- he doesnt need a lawyer to tell the media he is innocent.
Why hire a defense attorney to represent you instead of a litigator to go after these people?
If Cecil has done nothing- he doesnt need a lawyer to tell the media he is innocent.
14
Posted on 11/12/10 at 2:58 pm to CoonassBulldog
where's your big news for today?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 2:59 pm to CoonassBulldog
Scott Van Pelt has been asking that everyday since the news broke.
Well I think we know the answer to this one.
quote:
Why hire a defense attorney to represent you instead of a litigator to go after these people?
Well I think we know the answer to this one.
This post was edited on 11/12/10 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 11/12/10 at 2:59 pm to pittmanmt
Jay doesn't know that Cecil is working for the fbi. It will all come out at 1:00 today.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 2:59 pm to CoonassBulldog
Simple: because he's guilty.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:01 pm to CoonassBulldog
Was Sarah Evans screaming from the rooftops with Jay was texting her ex-husband? When you lawyer up, it doesn't matter... if Cecil comes out and 'screams' anything, he'll look stupider than Joe Schad trying to read a teleprompter.
I'll hang up and listen.
I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:01 pm to CoonassBulldog
Likewise, why isn't Dan Mullen doing the same, seeing as how all the participants currently being investigated have MSU ties?
Why haven't the two assistants come out and publicly identified themselves, and asserted that they told Cecil to 'frick off, they weren't going to pay him one red cent', which I believe is the story being put out by the Bullie Rantards?
Why haven't the two assistants come out and publicly identified themselves, and asserted that they told Cecil to 'frick off, they weren't going to pay him one red cent', which I believe is the story being put out by the Bullie Rantards?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:03 pm to CoonassBulldog
"I will not confirm or deny the rumors..."
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:04 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
If Cecil has done nothing- he doesnt need a lawyer to tell the media he is innocent.
Naive, stupid or just stirring the pot?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:05 pm to ohiovol
What has Mullen done that is illegal? Cecil asked for money, didn't get what he wanted, so his son went to a school that offered what he wanted. What does Mullen need to say?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:05 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
why isn't Dan Mullen doing the same
Dan Mullen was on the Tim Brando show this morning answering those questions and basically said, Mississippi State has done everything they were suppose to do and John Bond did what he felt was best for Mississippi State's interest.
This post was edited on 11/12/10 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:06 pm to CoonassBulldog
If I'm innocent, I'm going to sit back, kick my feet up, and the let the NCAA do their thing.
The last thing I'm going to do is go crying to the media and complicate things.
The last thing I'm going to do is go crying to the media and complicate things.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:06 pm to CoonassBulldog
Because you were told to.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:07 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
Jay Barker
REC mouth piece.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:07 pm to lowspark12
Damn, aubbies have no self esteem. Will defend a cheater to the death. No standards what so ever. Who would send their kid there. It is down right embarrassing for the conference.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:07 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
Likewise, why isn't Dan Mullen doing the same, seeing as how all the participants currently being investigated have MSU ties?
Why haven't the two assistants come out and publicly identified themselves, and asserted that they told Cecil to 'frick off, they weren't going to pay him one red cent', which I believe is the story being put out by the Bullie Rantards?
because they arent being accused of anything...they have told their side of the story to the NCAA and SEC- that's why Cecil is in this predicament
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:07 pm to NashvilleTider
but yeah why not be telling people to f off?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:10 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
Likewise, why isn't Dan Mullen doing the same, seeing as how all the participants currently being investigated have MSU ties?
Are you really this stupid?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:15 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
they have told their side of the story to the NCAA and SEC- that's why Cecil is in this predicament
Really?
quote:
But the SEC, through spokesman Charles Bloom, revealed that in the reports that it received back from Mississippi State on this issue there was no mention–none–of any such conversations between staffers and the Newtons. I independently confirmed that last night with the SEC office.
https://blogs.ajc.com/barnhart-college-football/2010/11/12/cameron-newton-story-reaching-critical-mass/
Posted on 11/12/10 at 3:20 pm to CoonassBulldog
I have asked 4 different attorneys what they would do in this scenario:
Your client is being accused of soliciting funds for his son's signature, and the implication is that he used those dirty funds to help renovate his church, and he's getting killed in the media. He tells you it's all bogus, and he has documentation that the funds came from a legit source or several legit sources. Your client has not been charged with anything, nor subpoenaed, nor had a gag order placed on him by a judge. Would you tell your client to keep this exonerating info hushed up?
All four said they'd have arranged a press conference or interview as quickly as they could.
Your client is being accused of soliciting funds for his son's signature, and the implication is that he used those dirty funds to help renovate his church, and he's getting killed in the media. He tells you it's all bogus, and he has documentation that the funds came from a legit source or several legit sources. Your client has not been charged with anything, nor subpoenaed, nor had a gag order placed on him by a judge. Would you tell your client to keep this exonerating info hushed up?
All four said they'd have arranged a press conference or interview as quickly as they could.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News