Started By
Message

re: Is this pass interference?

Posted on 10/21/19 at 9:18 am to
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30851 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 9:18 am to
If you want a legit opinion, you need to show it in real time. Refs don't have the benefit of slow-mo instant replay.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14098 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 9:34 am to
This one is actually close enough to have a real discussion about. Unfortunately, based on the OP, pretty sure we all know a real conversation was not the intent.

Funny thing is that if this was the most egregious call that went in LSU’s favor then this was either a really well called game or LSU got screwed by the officials.

Which was it, OP?
Posted by Icoachfb
Greenville SC
Member since Jan 2019
1796 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 9:42 am to
I have a serious question for you. You post so much about LSU did a LSU grad take your wife or did you not get into LSU or something? You are very obsessed with LSU
Posted by Jenar Boy
Elsewhere
Member since Aug 2013
12524 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

I have a serious question for you. You post so much about LSU did a LSU grad take your wife or did you not get into LSU or something? You are very obsessed with LSU


Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
21778 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 2:05 pm to
Wow, even the SEC refs couldn't screw that call up. Could they?
Posted by Bosethus68
We Call It Dat Boot
Member since May 2011
4958 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 3:16 pm to
For sure, No Flag, No Foul. But dont talk about one potential and not the other
Posted by BearBait09
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
2307 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 4:40 pm to
To me, yes. its obviously PI. No look back = no play on the ball, you can't significantly contact the receiver before the ball arrives if you aren't presenting as attempting to exercise your equal right to catch the ball.

the question I have is how is this technique (for defense) supposed to work. I see this all over in college and so rarely in the Pros and I just don't get it. is the CB trying to block the QB's line of sight to their receiver and make them look to another option? or is this defense dependent on the referee's simply not wanting to call PI every time this happens?

I'm being genuine here, does someone have the ability to explain this coaching?
Posted by TwoTimeTiger
Member since Aug 2019
729 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 5:04 pm to
Nope doesn’t actually touch him till the ball gets there. Not grabbing either arm or the jersey.

Nothing illegal about running alongside a guy.

This post was edited on 10/21/19 at 5:06 pm
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

texag7
Did not even need to open the thread to know who it was about...
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

the question I have is how is this technique (for defense) supposed to work. I see this all over in college and so rarely in the Pros and I just don't get it. is the CB trying to block the QB's line of sight to their receiver and make them look to another option? or is this defense dependent on the referee's simply not wanting to call PI every time this happens?

I'm being genuine here, does someone have the ability to explain this coaching?

well, the guy covering the receiver is an outside speed rusher. He's not exactly known for his ability to cover WRs in space, so his best option was to run stride for stride with him, which is what he did.
quote:

No look back = no play on the ball,

been said several times ITT, but this isn't a requirement. There is no rule that says you have to turn around nor is a there a rule against face-guarding.
quote:

you can't significantly contact the receiver before the ball arrives if you aren't presenting as attempting to exercise your equal right to catch the ball.

looks pretty simultaneous to me in slow-mo. Imagine what the ref saw in real time without the benefit of slowing the play down.

But seriously, if this is the most egregious potential "missed call" in that game, then seems like the refs did a pretty good job
This post was edited on 10/21/19 at 5:21 pm
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
21778 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 5:30 pm to
That is called PI on 90% of the teams in the SEC, hell in all of CFB.
Posted by Tractor Tug60
South Texas
Member since Apr 2018
3060 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:00 pm to
You obsessed little dick sucker.
Posted by Tractor Tug60
South Texas
Member since Apr 2018
3060 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:01 pm to
@ psycho boy
Posted by JKChesterton
Member since Dec 2012
4011 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:08 pm to
No, there is no such thing as face guarding in college football. The MSU player was not impeded from making the catch, he jumped and the ball hit the LSU player in the back.
Posted by reggieray420
Member since Dec 2016
2700 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:09 pm to
Yeah probably. On the other hand, it wasn't a magic no call that influenced the outcome of the game, know what I'm saying.
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
5684 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

texag7
Asking LSU fans to complain about refs is like asking Oprah to give away a car.

Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

That is called PI on 90% of the teams in the SEC, hell in all of CFB.

What’s your point?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

ColoradoAg
And the angry twin.
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
30262 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:44 pm to
Looks like perfect timing to me
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39098 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:47 pm to
It’s whatever the ref calls it. It’s bang-bang. Looking at it in high def slo mo it appears he made contact slightly before the ball. In real time almost any ref would call that simultaneous with no foul.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter