If the season is lost to Covid

Depends on when the season is cancelled.

If the season is cancelled Nov 1st and Bama is 6-0 with wins over ranked Georgia, Tennessee and Texas A&M teams, the AP might go ahead and crown them National Champs.

Bama would have better wins

I'd say just put the top 4 teams in right now and just end this shite already! I soooo have had enough of this year!

quote:

---

Depends on when the season is cancelled.

If the season is cancelled Nov 1st and Bama is 6-0 with wins over ranked Georgia, Tennessee and Texas A&M teams, the AP might go ahead and crown them National Champs.

---

If it were Georgia there's no way the AP crowns the Dawgs. . .

Play this damn thing out. I don't care if teams are down to 11 players each.

If a full slate of hs games all across the nation can e played virtually covid free now for around 6 weeks i'd feel cfb will be able to also. All sports (college and pro) are proceeding with
minor glitches. Protocols, quick testing, and a vaccine in the very future are all in place.

The better question is, which teams can't claim it ?

The 'ol "my team sucks 3 weeks in so I don't care about the season" post. LOL

quote:

---

The 'ol "my team sucks 3 weeks in so I don't care about the season" post. LOL

---

I was just asking who's gonna claim the title first

quote:

---

If a full slate of hs games all across the nation can e played virtually covid free now for around 6 weeks i'd feel cfb will be able to also. All sports (college and pro) are proceeding with
minor glitches. Protocols, quick testing, and a vaccine in the very future are all in place.

---

Several weeks in everybody's managing pretty well . . . then Florida (of course) would be the program that infects the rest of CFB. Nobody's surprised.

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

LINK /