Started By
Message
If no conf championships, which teams would have gotten in?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:30 pm
Fair to say that Clemson and Ok easily in. AU would likely have been in too.
Would Wisky have been a lock? Or, do you think Bama would have been chosen by the committee over Wisky?
If same four teams would ha e been selected (no Bama), then conf championships games do matter.
Would Wisky have been a lock? Or, do you think Bama would have been chosen by the committee over Wisky?
If same four teams would ha e been selected (no Bama), then conf championships games do matter.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:31 pm to Coonass
If your mom and dad weren’t cousins, would you have an IQ above room temperature?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:33 pm to Coonass
If there were no CC games there would be no divisions. Schedules would be different. Records would be different
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:33 pm to Coonass
Maybe like the top 4 teams last week
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:34 pm to Coonass
The reason conference championships should exist is to prevent teams like Wisconsin from making it.
The Big Ten West is a garbage dump. Why should all the teams in the east beat up on each other while Wisconsin gets to coast?
Wisconsin is no better than UCF.
The Big Ten West is a garbage dump. Why should all the teams in the east beat up on each other while Wisconsin gets to coast?
Wisconsin is no better than UCF.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:36 pm to Coonass
If there were no laws, then you wouldn't have to worry about getting arrested for the baby you recently put in your sister.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News