Started By
Message
If conference goes to 16 teams, should we invite Tulane and GT back?
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:56 pm
Bring back all the OGs
32
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:57 pm to magildachunks
No, frick them.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:58 pm to magildachunks
Nahhh, just kick Mizzou and Arky out and they can take their places.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:01 pm to magildachunks
Subtract Mizzou
Add:
Oklahoma
Clemson
Virginia Tech
West:
LSU
Oklahoma
A&M
State
Ole Miss
Arkansas
Alabama
Vandy
East:
Clemson
Virginia tech
Auburn
Georgia
Florida
Tennessee
South Carolina
Kentucky
Add:
Oklahoma
Clemson
Virginia Tech
West:
LSU
Oklahoma
A&M
State
Ole Miss
Arkansas
Alabama
Vandy
East:
Clemson
Virginia tech
Auburn
Georgia
Florida
Tennessee
South Carolina
Kentucky
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:01 pm to magildachunks
GT walked out on us for no other reason than greed. They don't get a second chance.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:03 pm to magildachunks
Im sure most HCs in the conf would rather not play GT every year as long as Coach PJ is there
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:04 pm to Kilgore Trout
I'd take both back if the SEC gets turned down by Texas or Oklahoma or Oklahoma State. I'd like to see GA Tech back in the SEC in a way. I don't care for Tulane back in the SEC unless you want to have a beatable team in the SEC West to sort of schedule a break for the power teams.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:04 pm to magildachunks
NC State and Virginia Tech
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:06 pm to magildachunks
Yes, absolutely!
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:13 pm to Big Sway
I really don't get this Oklahoma obsession on this board.
Maybe because you guys are relatively close to them?
Wonder if we polled who was negative about them, if it would be an East/West division.
Not sure what Mizzou would think about adding them, it might be interesting for them if they were put in the West.
But I'm not too sure what Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Vandy, Kentucky, even the two Alabama would think of this.
Personally if it were to go to 16, I (and I pull for South Carolina) would like a North Carolina and Virginia team.
Maybe because you guys are relatively close to them?
Wonder if we polled who was negative about them, if it would be an East/West division.
Not sure what Mizzou would think about adding them, it might be interesting for them if they were put in the West.
But I'm not too sure what Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Vandy, Kentucky, even the two Alabama would think of this.
Personally if it were to go to 16, I (and I pull for South Carolina) would like a North Carolina and Virginia team.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:25 pm to biggsc
quote:
NC State and Virginia Tech
This. Tulane will never have the budget to contribute and GT does not fit either.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:33 pm to magildachunks
Maybe a TCU and NC State
or
Oklahoma State and Virginia Tech
or
Oklahoma State and Virginia Tech
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:36 pm to CobraCommander83
What is the benefit to 16 teams? The more you add, the more you need a conference tournament to determine a true champ. There would be a much bigger discrepancy between the easiest and hardest schedule than with 12 or 14. I think that's too bad already with 14.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:38 pm to magildachunks
Makes more sense to bring Sewanee back. Just imagine that Sewanee TV market bump.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:38 pm to magildachunks
We should contract back to 12. We got the tv markets, no reason to keep fads and swju around anymore. Time to erase Slive's mistake.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:39 pm to calcotron
quote:
What is the benefit to 16 teams? The more you add, the more you need a conference tournament to determine a true champ. There would be a much bigger discrepancy between the easiest and hardest schedule than with 12 or 14. I think that's too bad already with 14.
I think 16 is too much and 14 seems too much at times. However, I tend to think in the next 10 to 20 years...there would a possibility of super conferences forming.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:01 pm to magildachunks
We should never consider going to 16 teams. I think that we should retract and get rid of TAMU and Mizzou.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:04 pm to magildachunks
Expansion isn't about teams, it's about territory. How do people not know this?
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:12 pm to magildachunks
the wac was a 16 team conference once and folks described it as a scheduling nightmare as the saying goes be careful what you wish for. that said
UCF - yes I think UCF would be an interesting addition
NC State
UCF - yes I think UCF would be an interesting addition
NC State
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:13 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Expansion isn't about teams, it's about territory.
Well, if that's the case, then why not completely consolidate the TV markets in states instead of splitting them in half with the ACC and Big XII?
In other words, add Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Louisville, or Texas.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News