Started By
Message

Idea to dissuade players from “opting out” (quitting)

Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:20 am
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:20 am
Make them repay all education, food, and board expenses accrued since the beginning of the calendar year.

Problem solved.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:21 am to
No program would have the balls to be the first to do that because no one would sign with them.
Posted by Terrific Tales
Member since Jan 2019
19425 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:21 am to
I have a feeling you may run into a few legal troubles there
Posted by FittySeven
Member since Mar 2020
226 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:22 am to
Really, dude?
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:22 am to
Really
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:22 am to
quote:

I have a feeling you may run into a few legal troubles there

Legal troubles wouldn't be the big hurdle. The service academies do it. Those guys sign legally binding contracts when they enlist in the service academies. If they leave early, they have to pay the US government back their cost of attendance. College football teams could do it too, but no one would ever try it because no player would ever sign an LOI under those terms.
Posted by Laffy Taffy Tiger
Lake Charles
Member since Aug 2019
1146 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:23 am to
Don't let them enter the draft. Easy fix. Make them go to the NFL as a undrafted free agent making the league minimum
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:23 am to
If they don’t live up to their contractual obligation to play, the university has to be made whole.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:24 am to
quote:

Don't let them enter the draft. Easy fix.

What incentive would the NFL have for doing that?
Posted by Laffy Taffy Tiger
Lake Charles
Member since Aug 2019
1146 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:25 am to
The NFL wouldn't. Something has to happen though or college football is dead
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:25 am to
Good luck with that...lol

Just get rid of the bowls, expand the playoffs, start paying players and institute a draft. Just make this mini NFL. Hell, don’t even make the kids go to school. Most of them could give a shite less anyway.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:26 am to
The NFL would never damage their free farm system.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9292 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:26 am to
As an LSU fan, I support this.



As long as Florida is the first team to implement this policy.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:28 am to
Every school would have to agree.

It probably wouldn’t be hard to get state schools to sign on.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9292 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:32 am to
quote:

It probably wouldn’t be hard to get state schools to sign on.

It most certainly would. Because of this statement you already made:
quote:

If they don’t live up to their contractual obligation to play, the university has to be made whole.

As soon as schools openly admit they view athletes this way, the players unionize and the “amateur” model is completely dead.
Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
3681 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:40 am to
I’m afraid the horse is done out of the barn on opting out of games. I think the only way to truly fix it doesn’t fall to the schools or even the NCAA. The NFL will have to fix it. Instead of having 7 rounds in the draft they need to cut it back to about 5. If more players have to sign as an UFA and end up getting a basic contract then more players would stay in school or at least play in all the games they can to try and be a player drafted so they can get more money. Those that will be high round draft picks like Lawrence at Clemson may still opt out of games if they are not playing for a title but a lot of other guys would end up playing.
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:51 am to
Lol I hope the OP is joking. No need for kids to risk their future and life changing money over a meaningless exhibition game.

Just do away with bowl games before it turns into the Pro Bowl.
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 12:53 am to
quote:

The NFL will have to fix it. Instead of having 7 rounds in the draft they need to cut it back to about 5. If more players have to sign as an UFA and end up getting a basic contract then more players would stay in school or at least play in all the games they can to try and be a player drafted so they can get more money.


How would this benefit the NFL? Why would the NFLPA want this?

Opt outs don’t harm the NFL at all. If bowls were totally eliminated it would not negatively impact them at all.
Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
3681 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 1:57 am to
I never said that it would benefit anyone. All I did was answer the question. The poster asked the best way to dissuade players from opting out and preparing for the NFL. And the way I suggested would keep more kids from opting out and playing in a bowl game for their last game. It also would keep a lot more underclassmen in school rather than chancing making a jump to the NFL. But I never said that it would benefit one side or the other or that it would even happen. I just provided an answer to the posters question. But I did provide a answer to your question in my original comment. If the NFL only held 5 Rds in the draft then they have to pay less players money for being a draft pick. Even though 6 and 7th round picks don’t make major money. NFL teams could sign a few more players a year as a UFA and pay the league minimum. They could save a few more dollars. So there is your answer.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 12/31/20 at 7:15 am to
quote:

No need for kids to risk their future and life changing money over a meaningless exhibition game.


So then you’re telling me that players are the final arbiter in deciding which games are meaningful?

Imagine having that opinion at work...
“No, mr boss. I’m not doing that because I find it meaningless and it could hinder my ability to get a better gig soon.”
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter