Started By
Message
How many colleges and universities will drop athletics altogether?
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:40 am
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:40 am
Most colleges and universities were operating their athletic departments at a deficit before this landmark ruling. They can't afford to pay players. How many colleges and universities will drop college athletics altogether?
Schools like Troy and Jacksonville State will never be able to compete with the big money schools. How many will fold up?
Schools like Troy and Jacksonville State will never be able to compete with the big money schools. How many will fold up?
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:42 am to TrendingRight
Why would a basketball player at Jacksonville State getting $500 a month from Jack's for a couple of billboards eating a chicken sandwich effect whether Jacksonville State can keep playing sports?
Is Jacksonville State going to fall way behind UT Martin, Austin Peay and Morehead State because of NIL rules? If not, then how exactly are they going to be forced to fold things up? The money is not transferring from the school to the player.......its transferring from private business to the player. This doesn't directly change anything in terms of the financials of athletic departments.
Is Jacksonville State going to fall way behind UT Martin, Austin Peay and Morehead State because of NIL rules? If not, then how exactly are they going to be forced to fold things up? The money is not transferring from the school to the player.......its transferring from private business to the player. This doesn't directly change anything in terms of the financials of athletic departments.
This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 9:47 am
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:42 am to TrendingRight
quote:
How many will fold up?
Eventually, the overwhelming majority.
I think the bigger question is why that should be a problem.
This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 9:43 am
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:42 am to TrendingRight
The schools without decent football will fold up shop on the grid iron. They may just concentrate all their efforts on basketball or baseball instead where they can be more competitive.
Follow the DBU model, for example
Follow the DBU model, for example
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:43 am to TrendingRight
Those two were competing with the big guys before the ruling
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:44 am to TrendingRight
While I hate the NCAA, I do not like the ruling as it throws out a 100 years of precedence. Huge crowds and money on the proper scale have always been big. Your payment is your scholarship and you dont have to play if you don't like it.
I feel this will ultimately damage the game as the rich just got richer and there will be an opposite reaction financially.
Like everyone in college, you are there to learn your trade to make a living post college. Have no issue with the stipend.
I feel this will ultimately damage the game as the rich just got richer and there will be an opposite reaction financially.
Like everyone in college, you are there to learn your trade to make a living post college. Have no issue with the stipend.
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:46 am to TrendingRight
Because of this ruling? None.
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:47 am to pvilleguru
How can you say that?
Almost all FCS schools are going to suffer from this
Almost all FCS schools are going to suffer from this
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:48 am to TrendingRight
quote:
Most colleges and universities were operating their athletic departments at a deficit before this landmark ruling. They can't afford to pay players. How many colleges and universities will drop college athletics altogether?
Schools like Troy and Jacksonville State will never be able to compete with the big money schools. How many will fold up?
They will keep football and basketball only. The socialism everyone wants is currently in place by revenue sharing across all sports, basically what all the crybabies want. When it draws back to the revenue generating sports, football and basketball, it will have to move a capitalism setup with the revenue staying in the two sports bringing it in. When schools have to drop the rest of the sports, volleyball, soccer, etc. the argument will shift to sexism, and the r word that has 1500 definitions now.
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:49 am to Pastor Mike
quote:
Almost all FCS schools are going to suffer from this
How are NIL laws going to negatively effect FCS schools? Now, if we get to a point of a school itself needing to supply an additional monetary stipend to players across the athletic department? Sure - that's going to destroy smaller budget schools.
NIL doesn't have anything to do with direct financial payments from schools to players. And it doesn't change anything in terms of where players go to school because kids at Jacksonville State and Samford aren't all of a sudden going to go to Alabama and LSU. They would have done that pre-NIL if they could. Their players just get smaller, more local deals with businesses.
Some Troy OL doing an ad for a Dothan outdoors store. Jax State players for Jack's. Etc, etc.
This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 9:52 am
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:50 am to Pastor Mike
quote:
How can you say that?
Almost all FCS schools are going to suffer from this
This doesn't require schools to pay players or give them more shite. It just says the NCAA can't prevent them from doing it. You can continue to offer what you currently offer.
Posted on 6/22/21 at 9:51 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
And it doesn't change anything in terms of where players go to school because kids at Jacksonville State and Samford aren't all of a sudden going to go to Alabama and LSU.
Exactly
Posted on 6/22/21 at 10:03 am to Pastor Mike
quote:
How can you say that?
Almost all FCS schools are going to suffer from this
What law is making the schools themselves pay players? It’s not the NIL. NIL allows outside compensation.
This a big win for Olympic athletes too who have had to give up major endorsement deals and leave university teams just to get the financial benefits of being endorsed. And they don’t all attend your typical Power 5 schools.
This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 10:04 am
Posted on 6/22/21 at 10:03 am to pvilleguru
What I am saying about the FCS is this - they already have a hard time making budget with the product they are able to put on the field. If students see a path to create income beyond the scholarships offered by the FCS schools, they will be trading schools constantly if they think it will improve their brand. FCS already struggles getting 3 star athletes. They won't be able to touch them after this
Posted on 6/22/21 at 10:03 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
The money is not transferring from the school to the player.......its transferring from private business to the player. This doesn't directly change anything in terms of the financials of athletic departments.
The only way I see this hurting the financials of the athletic departments is if the private business had $X they donated to the school for football each year, now instead of giving $X to the school, they give $X minus whatever they paid straight to the players
Posted on 6/22/21 at 10:05 am to TrendingRight
Major college athletic departments are cash machines.
Posted on 6/22/21 at 10:08 am to Pastor Mike
quote:
What I am saying about the FCS is this - they already have a hard time making budget with the product they are able to put on the field. If students see a path to create income beyond the scholarships offered by the FCS schools, they will be trading schools constantly if they think it will improve their brand. FCS already struggles getting 3 star athletes. They won't be able to touch them after this
How is any of this going to affect the budget of FCS schools? Again, no one is making them increase their budget.
This post was edited on 6/22/21 at 10:10 am
Posted on 6/22/21 at 10:09 am to jchamil
"The money is not transferring from the school to the player...its transferring from private business to the player. This doesn't directly change anything in terms of the financials of athletic departments."
Guys - this ruling has nothing to do with NIL - that is a totally different matter. I'm hoping that this ruling will allow schools to offer more scholarships to college baseball teams. A lot of marginal pro players try it anyway because they can't afford college, so maybe this will open up more than 11.8 scholarships for a 30 man roster.
Guys - this ruling has nothing to do with NIL - that is a totally different matter. I'm hoping that this ruling will allow schools to offer more scholarships to college baseball teams. A lot of marginal pro players try it anyway because they can't afford college, so maybe this will open up more than 11.8 scholarships for a 30 man roster.
Posted on 6/22/21 at 10:12 am to lewis and herschel
quote:
feel this will ultimately damage the game as the rich just got richer and there will be an opposite reaction financially.
Fixing what isn't broke. What's the worst that can happen?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News