Started By
Message
Here Possible Targeting Rule Modification...Points or Player Ejections
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:16 pm
If targeting is verified, the head coach has the option of either allowing the player to be ejected or give up points in exchange. I say 3 points if the difference is say less than 14 points. I would give up 7 points if the score difference is greater than 7 points. The reason I say this is because in the case of a blowout, a coach may not care giving up 3 points if the team is up by 3 TD’s.
Either way, the foul is recognized and the head coach of that player gets a way of keeping on the field if needed.
Either way, the foul is recognized and the head coach of that player gets a way of keeping on the field if needed.
7
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:17 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Lame
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:17 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
give up points in exchange
You can't actually be this stupid, can you?
quote:
Clemson fan
Oh, wait, I guess you can. My bad.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:17 pm to lewis and herschel
If a UGA fan requested it you would like it...LOL
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:18 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Sorry, but this is a very bad idea 
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:18 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Hey Clemson, frick off.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:19 pm to CU_Tigers4life
You are the big stupid
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:19 pm to TigerFan4040
No...PS..Make the playoffs so we can beat you again.
Signed: Clemson
Signed: Clemson
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:19 pm to CU_Tigers4life
I think they should just use common sense - was it intentionally malicious? Yes - 15 yards and ejection.
No - 15 yards and no ejection.
Was it helmet to helmet but ticky tack?
Yes - no foul.
No - 15 yards and no ejection.
Was it helmet to helmet but ticky tack?
Yes - no foul.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:20 pm to YoungTigah
quote:
You are the big stupid
Would you have given up 3 points in the Miss State game to have your player start in the Bama game?
Simple yes or no...
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:21 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
If a UGA fan requested it you would like it...LOL
Oh, you're a girl.
Pics?
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:21 pm to Teague
quote:
I think they should just use common sense - was it intentionally malicious? Yes - 15 yards and ejection.
No - 15 yards and no ejection.
Was it helmet to helmet but ticky tack?
Yes - no foul
Because if there's one thing people love, it's letting referees make judgement calls.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:22 pm to CU_Tigers4life
So once your team is up by a comfortable margin they can lay caution to the wind and light the other team the frick up?
sounds like a great plan.
sounds like a great plan.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:23 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
Because if there's one thing people love, it's letting referees make judgement calls.
It's always going to come down to judgement calls.
Whatever they do though, I think they need to dial back on all this targeting a bit.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:23 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
So once your team is up by a comfortable margin they can lay caution to the wind and light the other team the frick up?
sounds like a great plan.
That used to be the way it was done before and it was called a personal foul and a 15 yard penalty. It is a contact sport
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:25 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
That used to be the way it was done before and it was called a personal foul and a 15 yard penalty. It is a contact sport
Yeah but why should the currently winning team be able to break rules with less consequences than the team trying to come from behind?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News