Started By
Message
Here are the still shots of the ball after it hit the rim
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:58 pm
[/img]
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:58 pm to cas4t
ESPN going in dry on the missed call by the refs.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:59 pm to cas4t
Per the rule any part of the ball that’s in the cyclinder is considered interference. The cylinder extends upward.
Are you saying it wasn’t in the cylinder?
Are you saying it wasn’t in the cylinder?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:59 pm to cas4t
I’m sure all the Kentucky fans will stop melting now that it’s clearly shown it wasn’t offensive goaltending
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:59 pm to kywildcatfanone
They need to see the still shots then. That’s not in the cylinder.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:59 pm to cas4t
There are better photos form above the basket.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:59 pm to cas4t
Should’ve gotten the one we saw when it first went to review. When the camera was above the basket. I was convinced it was goaltending until I saw that angle.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:00 pm to BluegrassBelle
So it wasn’t goal tending by kentucky before that? two hands through bottom of net
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:00 pm to kywildcatfanone
lol melt bitch. I guess this is how I would feel if UK beat us in football so it’s okay to be upset for awhile
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:00 pm to BluegrassBelle
In literally all of those still shots the ball is clearly not in the cylinder. I feel like Im taking crazy pills??
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:00 pm to cas4t
Hmmmm...I wonder if there could possibly be an issue with the perspective of these particular shots.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:00 pm to Jones
It is. But in practice, the rule is more of a judgment call and the refs will typically allow plays like that to go on even if it violates the actual text of the rule. Kinda like pass interference
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:00 pm to bigDgator
This was from my tv when they reviewed it. I’m not rewinding again.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:00 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Per the rule any part of the ball that’s in the cyclinder is considered interference. The cylinder extends upward.
Are you saying it wasn’t in the cylinder?
It was defensive goaltending.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:01 pm to WestCoastAg
Fair
Hush with the PI reference and apologize
Hush with the PI reference and apologize
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:01 pm to SmoothOperator96
quote:
Should’ve gotten the one we saw when it first went to review. When the camera was above the basket. I was convinced it was goaltending until I saw that angle.
that is the angle that pretty much confirmed offensive goaltending.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:01 pm to OleManDixon
Yes your eyes are deceiving you
That ball is clearly in the cylinder
I mean wtf
That ball is clearly in the cylinder
I mean wtf
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News