Started By
Message
Herbstreit was on Finebaum yesterday...
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:07 am
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:07 am
He said that this year he could see a real possibility that, if Bama and UF run the table and go into the SEC championship game as UF 1 and Bama 2 and Bama were to come out on top with a narrow victory, there could be a rematch in the BCS NC game...especially with the new BCS formula...
What think you guys? Possibility or not?
What think you guys? Possibility or not?
This post was edited on 10/16/09 at 7:19 am
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:09 am to Aubie83
Maybe if it went to overtime, but it seems really unlikely.
This post was edited on 10/16/09 at 7:09 am
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:16 am to Aubie83
I'm for what ever makes the BCS looks stupid and this would.
I would rather see Cincy or Boise get in to bust up this horse shite system.
I would rather see Cincy or Boise get in to bust up this horse shite system.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:16 am to Aubie83
quote:
What think you guys? Possibility or not?
Not likely. The universe would implode before the pollsters would allow 2 SEC teams to play for the NC. Besides, you have Texas, Boise St., Cincy, Virginia Tech, and of course USC hot the heels of the top 2.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:38 am to LouisianaLonghorn
But say you have a 1 loss Alabama and 1 loss Virginia Tech there. How could you put Va. Tech in over Alabama--you can't. See LSU 2007.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:49 am to Aubie83
Herbie was all about a rematch of Mich and OSU several years ago when they met as #1 and #2.
In any case is is a ridiculous idea. Number 1, you have your chance to prove who is best at a neutral site called the SECCG. Number 2, what if the loser of the SECCG rematches and wins in the BCSCG? What has been proven? Nothing. Who is number 1? No one. You would end up saying one team was better at the end of the regular season and the other was better in bowl season.
It is a dumb idea.
In any case is is a ridiculous idea. Number 1, you have your chance to prove who is best at a neutral site called the SECCG. Number 2, what if the loser of the SECCG rematches and wins in the BCSCG? What has been proven? Nothing. Who is number 1? No one. You would end up saying one team was better at the end of the regular season and the other was better in bowl season.
It is a dumb idea.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 7:55 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
I hope not. There really is no reason. All the chips are down in SECCG whoever wins that should be presumed the better team. I am not saying Alabama will play in the game, but if we do and are undefeated and same with Florida I say lose goes to the Sugar bowl.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 8:00 am to Aubie83
Under your scenario, never. I think the voting component would do everything in there power to prevent this from happening.
Now, if everyone else had two losses just like the 2007 season then I think you would see a rematch.
Now, if everyone else had two losses just like the 2007 season then I think you would see a rematch.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 8:05 am to CrimsonTusk
"But say you have a 1 loss Alabama and 1 loss Virginia Tech there. How could you put Va. Tech in over Alabama--you can't. See LSU 2007."
See 2008 Texas team. They beat Oaklahoma during the regular season but were denied a shot at the BCS championship becuase they did not win their conference. If an udefeated Alabama and Florida play for the SEC Championship the looser probably will fall out of the NC picture.
See 2008 Texas team. They beat Oaklahoma during the regular season but were denied a shot at the BCS championship becuase they did not win their conference. If an udefeated Alabama and Florida play for the SEC Championship the looser probably will fall out of the NC picture.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 8:08 am to rbiggarjr
if bama somehow is able to beat UF in the SECCG, i would not want to play them again.
i would want an easy win, like against the buckeyes in the NCG.
i would want an easy win, like against the buckeyes in the NCG.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 8:21 am to rbiggarjr
quote:
They beat Oaklahoma during the regular season but were denied a shot at the BCS championship becuase they did not win their conference. If an udefeated Alabama and Florida play for the SEC Championship the looser probably will fall out of the NC picture.
True. But if they have identical records, how can anyone justify putting Va. Tech in over Alabama? Even if Va. Tech wins their conference.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 8:25 am to spslayto
Sadly, there is precident, and it happened last season. Oklahoma over Texas. I know that's more the Big XII's fault with their tiebreaker, but it could happen again in this scenario. However, if a rematch is going to happen it would possibly happen with a 12-1 SEC versus a 13-0 SEC, if ever.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 8:33 am to AUriptide
quote:
I'm for what ever makes the BCS looks stupid and this would.
How so? The BCS is just meant to put the 2 best teams against each other for a NC game. If UF and Bama are the 2 best teams, then it did what it was supposed to do.
That being said, I wouldn't want to see a rematch game.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 8:37 am to wilceaux
PLAYOFF... DAMNIT!
FOCK THE BCS!!!!!!
I think frikkin Boise State, or Oregon State should get the same chance any team does.
The BCS f'cking SUCKS.
FOCK THE BCS!!!!!!
I think frikkin Boise State, or Oregon State should get the same chance any team does.
The BCS f'cking SUCKS.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 9:05 am to Aubie83
I think the rest of the country would love to see us beat up on each other for a NC - I would rather see one of the two in the next best BCS game and win that too.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 9:11 am to Aubie83
IMO, that would not be fair to the winner for obvious reasons.
Posted on 10/16/09 at 9:15 am to BuckeyeFan87
Not gonna happen....
says the SEC whipping post
j/k dude - kinda
says the SEC whipping post
j/k dude - kinda
Posted on 10/16/09 at 9:20 am to Aubie83
WORLD WAR III with the other pussy conferences.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News