Started By
Message
re: Expecting a good game between Bama and Oklahoma
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:37 am to Old Sarge
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:37 am to Old Sarge
quote:
You are making up your own little criteria to exclude LSU
Nah. I don't think anyone seriously thinks of LSU as a blue blood. They've accomplished a lot in the last 22 years. That's really small on the scale. They were not good during a whole stretch of the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's. And honestly before the 50's weren't exactly stellar. I'd put them up there with Miami maybe.
Hell, I don't think even Texas should be considered a blue blood. And to be square, I'm talking football, the father of American collegiate sports.
Now, baseball? Sure if someone wants to make that argument about LSU being a baseball blue blood, I wouldn't argue over it.
1
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:40 am to theballguy
quote:
This is a misconception. They were never blue bloods. They didn't keep their success over a 75 year period or thereabouts.
Nebraska will lose their blue blood status soon. Their last conference championship was 27 seasons ago and their last NC game appearance was 25 seasons ago. Heck, Nebraska's last division championship was 14 seasons ago.
That's not sustained success, and it doesn't look like they will be usurping Ohio State in the Big 10 any time soon.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:41 am to McNet
All fair points 
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:42 am to theballguy
I said “modern” blue blood
And this is obvious to anyone, first championship ever in the 60’s, 2 of their 4 claimed have asterisks, only 1 in the last 50 years and none in the last 2 decades
Did you watch our game against Missouri? The ESPN announcers kept calling Texas A&M a blue blood. Now there are some people who don’t have a clue what a blue blood is.
quote:
Hell, I don't think even Texas should be considered a blue blood. And to be square, I'm talking football, the father of American collegiate sports.
And this is obvious to anyone, first championship ever in the 60’s, 2 of their 4 claimed have asterisks, only 1 in the last 50 years and none in the last 2 decades
Did you watch our game against Missouri? The ESPN announcers kept calling Texas A&M a blue blood. Now there are some people who don’t have a clue what a blue blood is.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:43 am to theballguy
The distinction of blue blood is pertinent and relevant to any one game being played at on any given Saturday.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:43 am to Old Sarge
quote:
“modern” blue blood
I don't know what that term means when placed together. You either are or you are not a blue blood.
I might use the term "elite" program like for instance, Georgia.
I might have used that for LSU but now, I just say major football program.
I feel like that's generous considering the potentially self-destroying shite they've brought upon themselves with this current fiasco.
quote:
The ESPN announcers kept calling Texas A&M a blue blood.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 9:54 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:46 am to theballguy
Oklahoma and Alabama have a lot of similarities outside of football as well. Size of States, politics, geograhics, both have little brothers in OSU and Auburn, etc. I could see this turning into an Oklahoma/Nebraska type of rivalry.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:47 am to theballguy
quote:
“modern” blue blood
quote:
I don't know what that term means
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:51 am to Wishbone85
quote:
Oklahoma and Alabama have a lot of similarities outside of football as well.
And don't forget Georgia -- lots in common of course.
Hell, here in Colorado, the out of towners I like most are from Oklahoma
Always great to talk football with them. Native Coloradans can only talk about the Broncos. Not nearly as interesting cfb.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 9:54 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:56 am to theballguy
quote:
All fair points
To further the point, Minnesota was considered a blue blood up until the 60s with seven claimed NCs, but lost that quickly when Michigan, Ohio State and Michigan State really started to dominate the Big 10.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:58 am to McNet
quote:
To further the point, Minnesota was considered a blue blood up until the 60s with seven claimed NCs, but lost that quickly when Michigan, Ohio State and Michigan State really started to dominate the Big 10.
Yep. That's true. Minnesota is a former historically great program
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:01 am to Sooner1984
quote:
Our OC. He's very pass-happy like a younger version of Lincoln Riley, but even more so. He doesn't realize yet that we can run the ball and that it actually helps his offense.
OU is third in sec rushing in the last 3 weeks. I’d say he’s figured it out.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:04 am to theballguy
quote:
The changing definition of a blueblood The term's meaning has shifted over time, with recent successes by programs like Clemson, Georgia, and LSU leading some to argue the traditional list is outdated. Some analysts propose updating the definition to emphasize recent performance, which would include more programs that have had recent dynasties. Conversely, others argue that true "blueblood" status requires dominance across generations, not just recent success, which keeps the traditional list intact.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:05 am to Boomer00
Right about the same time X became healthy enough to play.
Hmmm.....
Hmmm.....
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:00 pm to Boomer00
quote:
OU is third in sec rushing in the last 3 weeks. I’d say he’s figured it out.
That's in spite of him, not because of him. Arbuckle isn't patient enough. I think Brent finally had a word with him.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News