Started By
Message
ESPN ran the old BCS computer numbers and
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:33 pm
the top four was the exact same as what the committee gave us. So the idea that Bama got in because of SEC bias is BS.
13
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:33 pm to bcoop199
Dont tell Danny Kanell
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:34 pm to bcoop199
Try telling that to all the butthurt LSU fans
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:34 pm to bcoop199
To be fair its impossible to run old BCS numbers when most of the formula could be influenced by rankings that did not exist before
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:35 pm to Giant Leaf
quote:
impossible
Nothing is impossible if you believe.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:36 pm to bcoop199
It is pretty apparent that the committee got it right.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:37 pm to Giant Leaf
True, they had to use the AP poll since the Harris poll is gone.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:37 pm to bcoop199
quote:
because of SEC bias is BS.
Except that people also accused the BCS of SEC bias.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:38 pm to bcoop199
quote:
the top four was the exact same as what the committee gave us. So the idea that Bama got in because of SEC bias is BS.
Cool....lets go back to computers then...committee seems ridiculous. Top four in BCS system works fine let the numbers fall where they may
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:39 pm to bcoop199
quote:
the top four was the exact same as what the committee gave us. So the idea that Bama got in because of SEC bias is BS.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:39 pm to WestSideTiger
Of course they got it right. Bama is favored to win it all over the other 3 teams. If they are considered the best team why is there a debate?
Check odds here:
LINK /
Check odds here:
LINK /
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:39 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:
Except that people also accused the BCS of SEC bias.
I don't know why. They always seem to forget that an Auburn team was left out undefeated in 2004 and we had to watch USC destroy an over-rated Oklahoma.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:40 pm to bcoop199
I'm embarrassed by my fellow LSU brethren bitching about Bama getting in. It is what it is and Bama got in by default. We backed into our title in 2007 and have no room to talk about somebody slipping in.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:45 pm to JCdawg
It's just time to go to 8 teams. 5 P5 Champions and 3 at-large. Keep the same top 8 from this year and sub in UCF for Auburn and make them the 8 seed. You'd have this in the 1st round:
Clemson vs. UCF
OU vs. USC
UGA vs. Wisconsin
Bama vs. tOSU
Would've been a lot of fun to watch.
Clemson vs. UCF
OU vs. USC
UGA vs. Wisconsin
Bama vs. tOSU
Would've been a lot of fun to watch.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:46 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:Except the LSU fans that cried for change after 2003
Except that people also accused the BCS of SEC bias.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:47 pm to IIxxBREADxxII
quote:
We backed into our title in 2007 and have no room to talk about somebody slipping in.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:47 pm to IIxxBREADxxII
quote:
I'm embarrassed by my fellow LSU brethren bitching about Bama getting in. It is what it is and Bama got in by default. We backed into our title in 2007 and have no room to talk about somebody slipping in.
The problem with 2007 is LSU won the SEC and everyone else kept losing. Everyone had 2 losses except Kansas and Hawaii.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:48 pm to MightyYat
I love it when idiots try and make that comparison.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:48 pm to bcoop199
That and I just mean that just having the playoff rankings out there influences all the human polls that are factored in
While not earth shattering change it could in fact change the numbers
So its sort of impossible to reconcile the two systems perfectly
While not earth shattering change it could in fact change the numbers
So its sort of impossible to reconcile the two systems perfectly
Posted on 12/4/17 at 12:48 pm to bcoop199
So, like I said, the committee is no different then the flawed BCS system they replaced.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News