Started By
Message
re: Earned Run Averages of the SEC
Posted on 4/5/13 at 11:57 pm to GeauxWarTigers
Posted on 4/5/13 at 11:57 pm to GeauxWarTigers
The defense has been a work in progress, Anderson is the short stop with all the errors, but he was the right fielder last year. He's taking a while to adjust.
Posted on 4/5/13 at 11:59 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
We're simply trying to follow the rules.
Posted on 4/5/13 at 11:59 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Ice is trying to clean up the board from all the blatant flaming.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:00 am to I Ham That I Ham
quote:
Okay, well at no point did I ever say this team is better than this other one based on ERA. I just made this thread to look at ERA. Several SEC teams happen to have really good ones.
No where did I say you did.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:01 am to TheCheshireHog
Good. Last couple of days it's been a s-hole. 92 thousand AU threads then just about anything that pops in someone's head on top of that. Good deal.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:02 am to GeauxWarTigers
You said it's foolish to only consider ERA when evaluating a team. Nobody here was. So why did you bring that up?
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:02 am to I Ham That I Ham
quote:
Earned Run Averages of the SEC
quote:
I Ham That I Ham
Man, next weekend is looking bigger and bigger.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:03 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Ice moved a couple of Arkansas threads to the Arkansas board and Ham is now on a mission 
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:05 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Do you come to my threads because they are thought provoking and interesting or because you see my handle and know that it must be a quality thread? In fact I might start a thread for everyone asking that question.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:06 am to LSUNV
quote:
Ham is now on a mission
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:07 am to I Ham That I Ham
Where would that thread have to go?
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:07 am to LSUNV
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:08 am to I Ham That I Ham
quote:
Do you come to my threads because they are thought provoking and interesting or because you see my handle and know that it must be a quality thread? In fact I might start a thread for everyone asking that question.
RA'ed
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:08 am to LSUNV
oh frick you're right.
it definitely wouldn't be suitable for the SECrant. that's for sure.
it definitely wouldn't be suitable for the SECrant. that's for sure.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:08 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:08 am to I Ham That I Ham
quote:
You said it's foolish to only consider ERA when evaluating a team. Nobody here was. So why did you bring that up?
To create discussion.
Why did you create a thread on ERA?
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:10 am to GeauxWarTigers
for a more educated SEC baseball community. I never wanted a discussion or replies.
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:12 am to I Ham That I Ham
quote:
I never wanted a discussion or replie
but without all of these replies for you to reply to how would you boost your post count?
Posted on 4/6/13 at 12:13 am to I Ham That I Ham
quote:You didn't want a discussion on a discussion board?
I never wanted a discussion or replies.
Popular
Back to top



0





