Started By
Message

College football blue bloods

Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:11 pm
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
14206 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:11 pm
Posted by biclops
Member since Oct 2011
6149 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:15 pm to
KYLEUMLANG needs to tweak his system. Like, a lot.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28499 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:15 pm to
Heismans shouldnt be the second most valuable attribute.

Nebraska has almost played their way out of blue blood status. There recruiting will never allow them to crawl back to the top.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:17 pm to
I'll take it
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55206 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:18 pm to
He’s a longhorn blogger
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
9123 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:18 pm to
What is this nonsense?
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:19 pm to
LOL Michigan.




They are a brand, not a blue blood. They had a 40 year head start on college football almost and have as many legit national championships as Tennessee.


frick Michigan.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24829 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:19 pm to
He probably has the 8 blue bloods right but his criteria and assigned weights are kind of fricked up.
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:20 pm to
Tennessee is still damn close after almost a decade of suck. Impressive?

I'd throw out Hypemans, just look at Paul Hornung's.

Also Texas has been a rollercoaster compared to the others besides the 2000s
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7635 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:24 pm to
Some on that list look like some European royalty whose position over time has become weaker over time to be replaced by a new dynasty that is more dynamic, or who cling to past memories of grandeur while living in poverty,
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
18176 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:24 pm to
Ahh Toonces.



Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:26 pm to
I would drop many that is on the list. After USC at #6 I think the others thta may have had a claim would lose it now. USCw is in danger of losing their status, too.

I wouldn't consider anybody below Penn State as ever having been a blueblood, and Penn State, Texas and Nebraska have lost their claims, imo.
Posted by HogFanfromHTown
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2015
3597 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:28 pm to
This horrible. He obviously only used these 30 teams for his analysis, which right off the bat is not a valid way to go about it. How can the Hogs even be listed in the Heisman category when we've never had anyone with it? I'd love for the Hogs to be considered the 19th best program of all time, but this is shite I'm sorry.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19175 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:31 pm to
I would think all time wins would carry more weight than anything outside of national championships. Especially more weight than Heisman winners.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:33 pm to
6 charter members from the SEC in the top 15. No one else comes close.
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
4670 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:34 pm to
Makes absolutely no sense to have Heisman winners literally double the weight of an all-american and triple an NFL draft pick. It's 85% of the weight of a Natty. Just absurd lol.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

LOL Michigan.




They are a brand, not a blue blood. They had a 40 year head start on college football almost and have as many legit national championships as Tennessee.


frick Michigan.


Funny how UF has 3 crystal balls and they have 0.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:36 pm to
Wait, hold the frick up...


Georgia Tech has 0 Heisman winners in their program's history. Why the frick are they in the Top 5 for that category? Because the guy the trophy was named after coached there? frick off.
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Funny how UF has 3 crystal balls and they have 0.


Yet they are 4-1 against UFAG in that era
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

akes absolutely no sense to have Heisman winners literally double the weight of an all-american and triple an NFL draft pick. It's 85% of the weight of a Natty. Just absurd lol.

All the blue bloods display their Heismans with their national titles.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter