Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/15/18 at 8:46 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
When two ACC teams play for the title let us know.
A lot of ACC teams could have similar result as UGA last year. That was an all time easy schedule and they didnt face Auburn at full strength in the SEC title game.
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 9:27 pm to Tillman
It’s a joke man. I’m just messing with y’all where I can. Because our football team is currently in a nose dive. We have immense potential, but until changes are made I expect nothing.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 9:28 pm to jnethe1
i don't know about that...LSU has won more games than most teams in recent seasons.
just need to get some juice on offense. the defense is usually solid.
just need to get some juice on offense. the defense is usually solid.
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 9:41 pm to SCLibertarian
That’s hilarious!
Posted on 8/15/18 at 9:56 pm to Tillman
Yeah, we will be fine defensively. Even Chavis could pull off a good defense here. Offensively, we have nothing. I look forward to going to the Clemson game. Two great teams, and two great fan bases.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 11:30 pm to Tillman
quote:
not everybody is a LSU or SEC fanboy like you.
LOL! You're the biggest SEC fan boy on the rant! You lurk waiting for any opportunity to sneak into the clubhouse. ""Look at me look at me SEC! please look at me""!!! LOL!
Posted on 8/16/18 at 12:34 am to IStillMissDanny
Death Valley vs Death Valley. Who goin to die...
Posted on 8/16/18 at 1:33 am to IStillMissDanny
quote:
It's seven years away; too early for attacks like this.
Sadly, given how things have gone in recent years...by then, it could be changed to one game at a neutral site.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 2:23 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
This year is a wash as far as schedule between Clemson and USC. USC plays more bottom feeders (7 teams outside of top 50), but goes against a likely top 15 team in UGA.
Who cares about top 50 teams. This isn't basketball. Playing a bunch of teams between 40 and 50 doesn't make your schedule tougher.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 2:29 pm to Tillman
quote:
Clemson is smaller than every SEC school but Vandy and maybe Miss State so pointing out CLemson is 14th in attendance is actually making my point.
If you want to try to argue Clemson's stadium isn't loud during games, be my guest. I've seen Clemson 2nd on a list for loudest decibel level ever recorded in a stadium, 1 spot ahead of LSU.
I've already pointed out Clemson was a small military college until 1955. It doesn't make much sense to judge Clemson's program when it was a completely different kind of college.
Even though Clemson didn't win an ACC title in the BOwden era, Clemson was def. relevant. Winning Clemson's division generally requires a team to beat Clemson.
I remember when BC won our division in 2007 or so....Matt Ryan had to make an incredible throw down the field to beat Clemson at Clemson late in the game. If Clemson had defended that play, it plays in the confernece title game that year.
in my view if your team is a legit contender to play for a P5 conference title, it is relevant.
I do have to give Clemson credit for their attendance every year. It is a very difficult place to get in and out of, and most fans have to drive some distance to get to the games. This has always impressed me. I will give credit where credit is due. You have a very loyal fan base.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 2:30 pm to Cockeee Don
quote:
Playing a bunch of teams between 40 and 50 doesn't make your schedule tougher.
It makes it tougher than playing a bunch of teams between 50 and 60. That's how math works.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 2:30 pm to Glorious
quote:
Coach Lane Kiffin leads LSU to 2 big wins
fact
Posted on 8/16/18 at 2:35 pm to IStillMissDanny
quote:
It makes it tougher than playing a bunch of teams between 50 and 60. That's how math works.
I guess, but if you are ranked #2 in the country, I would expect to see at least one top ten team on there somewhere. Are you really concerned about all those 40+ ranked teams?
Posted on 8/16/18 at 2:39 pm to Tillman
quote:
A lot of ACC teams could have similar result as UGA last year.
You are full of shite.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 5:38 pm to FredBear
quote:
Clemson is going to backslide a lot over the next few years.
I think you guys have let the annoying Clemson fans here get to you and cloud your judgement.
Clemson is an elite program that’s recruiting at a level no one else in the ACC is coming close to.
Are they at Bama’s Level in overall talent? No - that was clear in the Sugar Bowl. Do they beat Bama without Deshaun Watson? - also no. But they’ve earned my respect - they’re getting Blue chip recruits and they did about as good a job as anyone at slowing down Bama’s run game last year.
Do yourself a favor and place a large sum of money on the -190 line for them to win the ACC next season and thank me in December when you get payed.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 5:49 pm to Tillman
quote:
A lot of ACC teams could have similar result as UGA last year.
13 - 2 with losses to Alabama and Auburn
ACC
12-2 = Clemson with losses to Syracuse and Alabama (should have lost Auburn game)
10-3 = Miami with losses to Pittsburgh, Clemson, and Wisconsin
So the correct answer is nobody in the ACC had similar results to UGA last year
Posted on 8/16/18 at 5:59 pm to Tillman
quote:
A lot of ACC teams could have similar result as UGA last year
Really? Cause last time I checked we beat more teams that finished in the top 25 (4) than the ACC champions did. As Well as defeating 3 teams that finished in the top 11. No other team had as many quality wins as us - not even the national champs. Our resume was a lot more impressive than Clemson’s - not even open for debate.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 5:44 pm to IStillMissDanny
SC plays two top five teams. Clemson plays zero top 20 teams. Absurd to say Clemson's schedule is tougher.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News