Started By
Message
re: Chris Low doesn't like the SEC schedule format
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:31 am to bigpapamac
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:31 am to bigpapamac
quote:
Any time yall do it just comes off as whining because, again, there's literally nothing to do about it.
It's just fun to watch those in Bammerland get just as annoyed at said "whining" knowing they only have one explanation for it, like we do.
0
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:31 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Blame should fall squarely on you choke artist defense not some scheduling conspiracy.
The point is LSU could lose to Georgia and Florida, but beat A&M and Bama and still not go to the SECCG. I don't think this scenario should be possible. The schedule isn't balanced. If the schedules are going to be unbalanced, division winners should be decided by division games only.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:31 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Why didn't LSU just beat Alabama last year at home?
If they simply do that, they would have been in the SECCG and probably would have won the BCSNC.
Blame should fall squarely on you choke artist defense not some scheduling conspiracy. Pathetic is what tiger fans have become since they've been processed.
If we had played Tennessee and you had played Florida then we would have been in the SECCG and probably would have won the BCSNC as well.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:32 am to CP3LSU25
quote:
Make people aware so this shite doesn't happen again. Everything should be equal and not give the backyard a home field advantage all year.
You have no idea how politics work.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:33 am to memphisplaya
I didn't want this point to get buried at the bottom of the last page, so I'll repost it. If anybody should be upset it should be South Carolina.
quote:
I don't give a damn one way or the other...
but one scheduling rearrangement affected multiple teams.
Georgia was supposed to rotate on to Bama's schedule.
LSU was supposed to make a return trip to South Carolina.
If they wanted to flip flop these games that would have been fine. LSU/Georgia, Alabama/South Carolina is a fair trade IMO.
But they didn't do that. They yanked Kentucky out of a game with somebody (Arkansas maybe?), gave them to Alabama, and now South Carolina gets neither LSU or Alabama at home, and LSU gets Georgia.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:35 am to TXGunslinger10
The funniest thing about this is they whined louder and longer than anyone on here a few years ago over the bye week thing
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:35 am to TXGunslinger10
quote:
LSU drinks too much to remember if they have any rivals. They just wake up, look at the schedule, and start hating the next team. -bigDgator
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:36 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
LSU drinks too much to remember if they have any rivals. They just wake up, look at the schedule, and start hating the next team. -bigDgator
I
'd. I know some people this applies to too.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:37 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
If we had played Tennessee and you had played Florida then we would have been in the SECCG and probably would have won the BCSNC as well.
Maybe. Maybe not. You did however uncover the real culprit.
If UT had not been a flaming hobo orgy dumpster fire frickfest for the past five years, we might not be having this discussion. I blame them.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:39 am to FlukerFlakes
This post was edited on 4/12/13 at 11:40 am
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:45 am to Wrenchruh
quote:
If UT had not been a flaming hobo orgy dumpster fire frickfest for the past five years
While you raise a good point, your administration has been the one raising nine kinds of hell to keep that game on the schedule. Not because of a rivalry, but because they know for the foreseeable future its a W in conference play. I can assure you, if Butch Jones turns that program around, in two years Bama-UT wont be an annual game.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:46 am to TXGunslinger10
quote:
They yanked Kentucky out of a game with somebody (Arkansas maybe?), gave them to Alabama
No they didnt. KY was set to rotate back on Bama's schedule in 2013
quote:
now South Carolina gets neither LSU or Alabama at home
Well they just played bama in 2010 in columbia
All they did was take UGA and Vandy off the 2012 schedule and UGA off 13
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:47 am to NYCAuburn
And LSU off of South Carolina's Schedule
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:49 am to TXGunslinger10
quote:
And LSU off of South Carolina's Schedule
So they took one of the harder teams off LSU orginal schedule?
Whats the problem
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:53 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Pathetic is what tiger fans have become since they've been processed.
Your hypocrisy is delicious. Remember what happened that last time Gump U felt slighted at the schedule? They bitched until the SEC MADE A RULE regarding bye weeks. But when LSU takes issues the Gumps are the first to call em out on it.
And more to the point: exactly what sort of dolts do we have in the SEC Office that they need 2 years of bridge scheduling? Shouldn't this have been resolved after year 1?
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:55 am to ibldprplgld
REC doing work. It is what it is, get use to it.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:55 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
Your hypocrisy is delicious
Did you chastise bama fans for bitching about the bye weeks?
quote:
exactly what sort of dolts do we have in the SEC Office that they need 2 years of bridge scheduling? Shouldn't this have been resolved after year 1?
Most of the SEC scheduling revolves around 2 years scenarios
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:55 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
Your hypocrisy
Said about EVERY Bama fan.
When they pissed and moaned about the date of the Iron Bowl, SEC changed it.
When they pissed and moaned about multiple bye weeks before the Bama game, SEC office made a rule.
When LSU fans bitch about playing UF vs UT, Bama fans deflect and tell us about their 34 National Championships.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 11:56 am to allin2010
quote:
REC doing work. It is what it is, get use to it.
SEC offices should be blown up and moved to Alaska
Page 2 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News