re: Chris Low doesn't like the SEC schedule format

quote:

---

bamathad

---

Lowest form of gump.

Only the lowest form of gumps will argue that the schedule is fair. The numbers speak for themselves. Can you look at the opponents record and honestly say it's fair?

Anyone with half a brain can see bama gets a much easier schedule every year.

Should LSU have beat bama last season? Yes. If they would have they would have been in the SECCG.
Does that make it acceptable that the SEC schedule always favors bama? frick no...

But but but ... LSU fans are just whiners.

quote:

---

Yea LSU fans are just conspiracy theorist whiny bitches for bringing this up and yet it's funny how all the media is writing articles this week about this very topic and you have the cfb live guys asking Miles about this very issue two days ago. But yea we are all just delusional crazy whiny bitches thats all it is.

---

There's a difference between claiming a conspiracy exists and pointing out LSU has a bit more difficult schedule.

Even in Chris Low's article, he merely points out LSU has a more difficult schedule. He makes no mention of nor hint at some vast bammerham SEC Office conspiracy.

Yes, it's delusional to suggest such a conspiracy.

quote:

---

Wow, you really need to get over that shite. If you beat them in the regular season then meet them in the upcoming playoffs, is that going to be a rematch too?

---

It was a joke. Hence the smily laughing, you ignorant douche.

quote:

---

Bull shite. LSU played their best game of the year last year against Bama

---

Yes, but it was our second game with a patchwork Oline.

12 the starting line in the opener
LT: Faulk
Lg: Collins
C logeran
RG: Williford
RT: Hurst

By the Bama game it was

LT: Josh D
LG: Collins
C: logeran(injured)
RG: Tuner(RS freshman)
RT: Alexander(True freshman)

Faulk was injured in the Washington game, Hurst left the team, Williford had concussions.

So don't tell me injuries weren't a concern. We also lost Blue our starting RB. Hill stepped up nicely.

quote:

---

And you sure as hell weren't tired and beat-up after a month off before 21-0

---

Now I see your motive.

quote:

---

Yes, it's delusional to suggest such a conspiracy

---

Not really, if you look at the historical context of SEC preferences.

quote:

---

this would all be solved easily if the SEC would make division record the determinant of division champions.

---

I 100% agree with this.

So does every South Carolina fan.

quote:

---

Fair? Fair has nothing to do with it. No one ever plays the same schedule. The last couple years, LSU has played a tougher schedule than Alabama. I don't think anyone's arguing that point.

---

Obviously, fair doesn't have anything to do with it. The schedule should be balanced though.

Bama vs Tenn, Mizz - Tenn, UK
LSU vs UF, USC - UF, UGA

Balanced? No.

quote:

---

this would all be solved easily if the SEC would make division record the determinant of division champions.

---

This is what needs to happen.

The only reasonable solution to all this is to remove Womack from the scheduling committee. He might do great things for the SEC, but there needs to be transparency and a lack of conflict of interest, or a perception of conflict of interests.

Having a Bama Alumn, and AD for the head is really a red flag. It doesn't really matter if he is unbiased or not, there is a clear independence issue here.