Started By
Message

Can we talk about targeting

Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:58 am
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:58 am
Setting aside how shittastically awful a rule it is, can someone please explain how a player carrying the football can now be deemed a "defenseless player"?

I don't even understand the rule anymore, and I'm not sure the refs do either.
Posted by TigerFan4040
Member since Sep 2013
4386 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:01 am to
Agree, some of these calls are way to close to the ball. The LSU targeting was a blindside block on a guy about to make the tackle (granted the hit was very close and seemingly helmet to helmet so so I get it).
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19054 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:01 am to
There will always be inadvertent helmet to helmet contact in football. I predict that in a few years football will be two hand touch.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:05 am to
I just don't get how these guys are supposed to play defense? They could call it on nearly every play if they are now going to call for tackling a ball carrier. You can't tackle without getting your head involved and how are you supposed to aim your hit on a moving target? It's insane.

Worse yet, it doesn't make the game any safer. It just artificially effects outcomes
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421412 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:07 am to
i've argued for years that if a defender begins a then-legal move and the offensive player initiates the H2H contact, the offensive player should be penalized. that would solve the majority of the questionable calls where the defender is torso-level and upon impact, the offensive player lowers his head and creates H2H
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:10 am to
Colleges and the NCAA have to act like they care about brain damage to players.

This accomplishes that.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:12 am to
Very true.

I could live with it if players didn't get kicked out of the game.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98915 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:13 am to
The issue isn't the interpretation of the rule, they're doing that as it's written. The issue is that the rule itself doesn't allow for much leeway in enforcement, such as stronger consideration of intent.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:21 am to
Agreed, but unless the rule is changed they are not enforcing it by the letter of the law.

A ball carrier can not be a "defenseless player" by definition. Watching different games last night I saw it called 3 times (overturned once) on a RB carrying the ball.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45981 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Setting aside how shittastically awful a rule it is, can someone please explain how a player carrying the football can now be deemed a "defenseless player"? I don't even understand the rule anymore, and I'm not sure the refs do either.


I get the fact the rule is there to protect players from serious injury, particularly head trauma but why doesn't that same rule apply to RB's?

A RB can break through the line leading with his helmet and I don't think I've ever seen that called for helmet to helmet contact.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:28 am to
Targeting by rule isn't only against defenseless players, FYI.
Posted by LegendOfCobb
Athens of the West
Member since Jun 2014
2363 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:29 am to
Was the Missouri player it was called on last night good?
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:31 am to
I understand the rule trying to protect players. But it cant be all black n white, they must take into mind that these players are running full speed at each other, if they both lower their heads at the same time there is not much the defender can do.

I look for intent. Not the hit itself as far as ejecting players.

Just my .02
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Was the Missouri player it was called on last night good?



No, but that's not the point.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:38 am to
quote:

No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)


quote:

Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14): A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass. A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier. A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return. A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier. A player on the ground. A player obviously out of the play. A player who receives a blind-side block. A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped. A quarterback any time after a change of possession. A ball carrier who has obviously given himself up and is sliding feet-first


Maybe I'm interpreting this wrong, but how exactly are you supposed to tackle a moving target without your helmet getting involved.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:43 am to
quote:

In college football, these things are targeting fouls, per the NCAA’s rulebook:

Making “forcible contact against an opponent with the helmet crown,” or the top of the tackler’s head.

Making “forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent.”
A targeting foul is an auto-ejection, and if it occurs in the second half, it includes a suspension for the first half of the following game.

A “defenseless opponent” includes, but isn’t limited to, a player:

in the act of, or having just thrown, a pass
who’s catching a pass or kick (or trying to) and hasn’t had time to become a “ball carrier.”
who’s in the act of kicking, or has just kicked
on the ground, or a player out of the play
who gets blind-side blocked
who has the ball and has had his forward progress stopped
who has the ball and is sliding or given himself up
Also:

A QB after he’s thrown a pick or someone’s fumbled the ball away
For a play to be targeting, it also has to have at least one “indicator.”

Launching, or “leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area”
A crouch and upward thrust to make head or neck contact, even if the hitter still has feet on the ground
Leading with the “helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area”
“Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet”
This post was edited on 10/8/17 at 9:44 am
Posted by mls4bama
albertville,al
Member since Sep 2015
1537 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:46 am to
its like most rules,its got way out of hand!!!
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:46 am to
Yeah, I don't know.

It's ruining football though. There has to be some leeway for the officials with intent here.

Ball carriers lower their head leading up to impact. How does a defensive player tackle him outside of diving for his feet?

It's the worst rule in all of sports.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Ball carriers lower their head leading up to impact. How does a defensive player tackle him outside of diving for his feet?
You can hit a ball carrier in the head as long as he hasn't become defenseless and as long as you don't use the crown of your helmet.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:54 am to
Again, if the ball carrier is barreling towards you...lowers his head anticipating contact, where do you aim?

Get under his helmet and go for his feet? Stand straight up and get trucked?

How do you make that tackle, and make sure you make that tackle, without getting your helmet involved? It's impossible
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter