Started By
Message
re: Bret Bielema wants rules changes to slow down no-huddle offenses
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:01 pm to Breesus2Jimmy
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:01 pm to Breesus2Jimmy
quote:
Then coaches like Hugh and Gus might have to actually coach football versus just running 400 fastbreak gimmicks every game.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:03 pm to Breesus2Jimmy
quote:
Then coaches like Hugh and Gus might have to actually coach football versus just running 400 fastbreak gimmicks every game.
There it is
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:03 pm to bdelarosa7
quote:
Bielema framed it as a player-safety issue -- just as Saban did when asking for similar rules changes last October.
these guys better be providing a powerpoint presentation that shows players getting hurt from not getting a breather.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:04 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:I hope the players get to sub during strength and conditioning training when they get winded as well.
these guys better be providing a powerpoint presentation that shows players getting hurt from not getting a breather.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:04 pm to RebFeBrees
I love when half-witted people assume that you don't know something they know, because they either don't understand your point or because of a subtle difference.
Yes, I know the referees hold up the snap to allow the defense to sub. But IMO, this doesn't completely even the field. Many, many times I've seen the referees hold the snap until the very moment the defender gets in position, and they simply aren't ready. The offense having several seconds to settle into position and read the field while the defense is still running on, is an advantage IMO.
Yes, I know the referees hold up the snap to allow the defense to sub. But IMO, this doesn't completely even the field. Many, many times I've seen the referees hold the snap until the very moment the defender gets in position, and they simply aren't ready. The offense having several seconds to settle into position and read the field while the defense is still running on, is an advantage IMO.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:06 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Bielema provided them with a wheel of cheese and two 30 packs of Milwaukee's Best, because he doesn't realize he's not in the slow10 anymore.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:07 pm to bdelarosa7
quote:
NCAA's Playing Rules Overweight Panel
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:07 pm to sugatowng
The SEC shut Mark Richt down back in 2002...
From the Macon Telegraph, June 3, 2004:...
From the Macon Telegraph, June 3, 2004:...
quote:
SEC Summer Meeting notebook:
Georgia football coach Mark Richt continued the two-year fight for his no-huddle offense this week at the SEC Meetings.
“He and I talked about it for the last three hours,” Bobby Gaston, the league’s director of officials, said Friday afternoon on the second day of the meetings at the Sandestin Hilton.
Since coming to Georgia, Richt has all but ditched the fast break offense he made famous at Florida State because, he says, the league’s officials don’t allow him to go fast enough to make it worthwhile. SEC officials are required to pause for 12-14 seconds between each play, and that’s not going to change despite Richt’s arguments, Gaston said.
“He doesn’t agree with it, but he knows what we’re doing,” Gaston said.
The mandatory pause is to allow the officiating crew to get in position, Gaston said. Richt argued that the officials should put the ball in play as soon as they are set, regardless of how much time has elapsed, but Gaston said that would provide the offense an unfair advantage.
“Mark Richt would eat their lunch,” he said. “He would go straight to the ball and snap it. He’d get in 100 plays. We have about half the coaches who think we go too fast and about half who think we go too slow so we must be in about the right spot.”
This post was edited on 6/18/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:08 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:This is silly.
Many, many times I've seen the referees hold the snap until the very moment the defender gets in position, and they simply aren't ready.
quote:How is it different from any other play?
The offense having several seconds to settle into position and read the field while the defense is still running on, is an advantage IMO.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:08 pm to bdelarosa7
quote:
Bret Bielema
quote:
AL.com reported Monday that Bielema, a member of the NCAA's Playing Rules Oversight Panel, proposed a rules change that would create "a 15-second substitution period" after each first down to allow defenses to substitute. At the recent SEC spring meetings, Bielema framed it as a player-safety issue -- just as Saban did when asking for similar rules changes last October.
Bret is a pussy and so is anyone else that thinks in a similar facet as he does.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:08 pm to USMC Gators
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/14/24 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:10 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
I love when half-witted people assume that you don't know something they know, because they either don't understand your point or because of a subtle difference
Was that directed at me or was I just the reply you picked?
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:12 pm to CosmicGas93361
quote:
This.
Y'all were not the only ones who utilized this perfectly planned game changing strategy in College Station.
It's not against the rules.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:12 pm to RebFeBrees
I think he just picked you, because nobody throws that many words and feels at two rolly laughs.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:15 pm to RebFeBrees
It was to WDE above. Unfortunately, he completely dismantled my argument with an insightful "this is silly", so I'm forced to concede the point. 
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:17 pm to McRebel42
quote:
Bret is a pussy and so is anyone else that thinks in a similar facet as he does.
Nick Saban?
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:18 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:You mean the fantastic point about your subjective experience seeing the abuses of the fast paced offense many many times. Solid point monty.
he completely dismantled my argument with an insightful "this is silly", so I'm forced to concede the point.
So, again, who should implement this time clock you are in favor of? the same refs you worry don't hold up play long enough under a rule already designed to prevent the "unfair" advantage you are so concerned with?
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:18 pm to FleaMarketBill
My suggestion to Nick and Bert is to DWI, because they will now be scheming against several fast-paced, HUNH offenses.
Ole Miss, AU aren't the only teams that will be doing it in the SEC. LSU's new OC says he wants to speed up the LSU offense, Butch Jones will impliment a version of the HUNH at UT, aTm, etc.
Hell, Saban goes no-huddle during games when he wants to.........
Ole Miss, AU aren't the only teams that will be doing it in the SEC. LSU's new OC says he wants to speed up the LSU offense, Butch Jones will impliment a version of the HUNH at UT, aTm, etc.
Hell, Saban goes no-huddle during games when he wants to.........
This post was edited on 6/18/13 at 3:20 pm
Popular
Back to top


1








