Started By
Message

re: Bret Bielema wants rules changes to slow down no-huddle offenses

Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:01 pm to
Posted by RebFeBrees
Pensacola, FL
Member since Dec 2009
13855 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Then coaches like Hugh and Gus might have to actually coach football versus just running 400 fastbreak gimmicks every game.



Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35906 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Then coaches like Hugh and Gus might have to actually coach football versus just running 400 fastbreak gimmicks every game.



There it is
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Bielema framed it as a player-safety issue -- just as Saban did when asking for similar rules changes last October.


these guys better be providing a powerpoint presentation that shows players getting hurt from not getting a breather.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

these guys better be providing a powerpoint presentation that shows players getting hurt from not getting a breather.
I hope the players get to sub during strength and conditioning training when they get winded as well.
Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:04 pm to
I love when half-witted people assume that you don't know something they know, because they either don't understand your point or because of a subtle difference.

Yes, I know the referees hold up the snap to allow the defense to sub. But IMO, this doesn't completely even the field. Many, many times I've seen the referees hold the snap until the very moment the defender gets in position, and they simply aren't ready. The offense having several seconds to settle into position and read the field while the defense is still running on, is an advantage IMO.
Posted by FleaMarketBill
Mayor of Wizard Township
Member since Apr 2010
12849 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:06 pm to
Bielema provided them with a wheel of cheese and two 30 packs of Milwaukee's Best, because he doesn't realize he's not in the slow10 anymore.
Posted by Hardy_Har
MS
Member since Nov 2012
16333 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

NCAA's Playing Rules Overweight Panel
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
26713 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:07 pm to
The SEC shut Mark Richt down back in 2002...

From the Macon Telegraph, June 3, 2004:...

quote:

SEC Summer Meeting notebook:

Georgia football coach Mark Richt continued the two-year fight for his no-huddle offense this week at the SEC Meetings.

“He and I talked about it for the last three hours,” Bobby Gaston, the league’s director of officials, said Friday afternoon on the second day of the meetings at the Sandestin Hilton.

Since coming to Georgia, Richt has all but ditched the fast break offense he made famous at Florida State because, he says, the league’s officials don’t allow him to go fast enough to make it worthwhile. SEC officials are required to pause for 12-14 seconds between each play, and that’s not going to change despite Richt’s arguments, Gaston said.

“He doesn’t agree with it, but he knows what we’re doing,” Gaston said.

The mandatory pause is to allow the officiating crew to get in position, Gaston said. Richt argued that the officials should put the ball in play as soon as they are set, regardless of how much time has elapsed, but Gaston said that would provide the offense an unfair advantage.

“Mark Richt would eat their lunch,” he said. “He would go straight to the ball and snap it. He’d get in 100 plays. We have about half the coaches who think we go too fast and about half who think we go too slow so we must be in about the right spot.”
This post was edited on 6/18/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Many, many times I've seen the referees hold the snap until the very moment the defender gets in position, and they simply aren't ready.
This is silly.
quote:

The offense having several seconds to settle into position and read the field while the defense is still running on, is an advantage IMO.
How is it different from any other play?
Posted by McRebel42
North Mississippi Hollywood
Member since Oct 2012
11606 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Bret Bielema


quote:

AL.com reported Monday that Bielema, a member of the NCAA's Playing Rules Oversight Panel, proposed a rules change that would create "a 15-second substitution period" after each first down to allow defenses to substitute. At the recent SEC spring meetings, Bielema framed it as a player-safety issue -- just as Saban did when asking for similar rules changes last October.

Bret is a pussy and so is anyone else that thinks in a similar facet as he does.
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32657 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:08 pm to
Support
Posted by CosmicGas93361
Member since Feb 2013
1357 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:08 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/14/24 at 2:58 pm
Posted by RebFeBrees
Pensacola, FL
Member since Dec 2009
13855 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

I love when half-witted people assume that you don't know something they know, because they either don't understand your point or because of a subtle difference


Was that directed at me or was I just the reply you picked?
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

This.

Y'all were not the only ones who utilized this perfectly planned game changing strategy in College Station.

It's not against the rules.
Posted by FleaMarketBill
Mayor of Wizard Township
Member since Apr 2010
12849 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:12 pm to
I think he just picked you, because nobody throws that many words and feels at two rolly laughs.
Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:15 pm to
It was to WDE above. Unfortunately, he completely dismantled my argument with an insightful "this is silly", so I'm forced to concede the point.
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16355 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Bret is a pussy and so is anyone else that thinks in a similar facet as he does.



Nick Saban?
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

he completely dismantled my argument with an insightful "this is silly", so I'm forced to concede the point.
You mean the fantastic point about your subjective experience seeing the abuses of the fast paced offense many many times. Solid point monty.

So, again, who should implement this time clock you are in favor of? the same refs you worry don't hold up play long enough under a rule already designed to prevent the "unfair" advantage you are so concerned with?
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:18 pm to
What a fat pussy.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
32154 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 3:18 pm to
My suggestion to Nick and Bert is to DWI, because they will now be scheming against several fast-paced, HUNH offenses.

Ole Miss, AU aren't the only teams that will be doing it in the SEC. LSU's new OC says he wants to speed up the LSU offense, Butch Jones will impliment a version of the HUNH at UT, aTm, etc.

Hell, Saban goes no-huddle during games when he wants to.........
This post was edited on 6/18/13 at 3:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter